These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

324 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31835808)

  • 1. Nano-(Q)SAR for Cytotoxicity Prediction of Engineered Nanomaterials.
    Buglak AA; Zherdev AV; Dzantiev BB
    Molecules; 2019 Dec; 24(24):. PubMed ID: 31835808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Current situation on the availability of nanostructure-biological activity data.
    Oksel C; Ma CY; Wang XZ
    SAR QSAR Environ Res; 2015; 26(2):79-94. PubMed ID: 25608859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Using nano-QSAR to predict the cytotoxicity of metal oxide nanoparticles.
    Puzyn T; Rasulev B; Gajewicz A; Hu X; Dasari TP; Michalkova A; Hwang HM; Toropov A; Leszczynska D; Leszczynski J
    Nat Nanotechnol; 2011 Mar; 6(3):175-8. PubMed ID: 21317892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Perspectives from the NanoSafety Modelling Cluster on the validation criteria for (Q)SAR models used in nanotechnology.
    Puzyn T; Jeliazkova N; Sarimveis H; Marchese Robinson RL; Lobaskin V; Rallo R; Richarz AN; Gajewicz A; Papadopulos MG; Hastings J; Cronin MTD; Benfenati E; Fernández A
    Food Chem Toxicol; 2018 Feb; 112():478-494. PubMed ID: 28943385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Nano-QSAR modeling for predicting the cytotoxicity of metallic and metal oxide nanoparticles: A review.
    Li J; Wang C; Yue L; Chen F; Cao X; Wang Z
    Ecotoxicol Environ Saf; 2022 Sep; 243():113955. PubMed ID: 35961199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Nano(Q)SAR: Challenges, pitfalls and perspectives.
    Tantra R; Oksel C; Puzyn T; Wang J; Robinson KN; Wang XZ; Ma CY; Wilkins T
    Nanotoxicology; 2015; 9(5):636-42. PubMed ID: 25211549
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Exploring quantitative nanostructure-activity relationships (QNAR) modeling as a tool for predicting biological effects of manufactured nanoparticles.
    Fourches D; Pu D; Tropsha A
    Comb Chem High Throughput Screen; 2011 Mar; 14(3):217-25. PubMed ID: 21275889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Literature Review of (Q)SAR Modelling of Nanomaterial Toxicity.
    Oksel C; Ma CY; Liu JJ; Wilkins T; Wang XZ
    Adv Exp Med Biol; 2017; 947():103-142. PubMed ID: 28168667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Cytotoxicity prediction of nano metal oxides on different lung cells via Nano-QSAR.
    Cheng K; Pan Y; Yuan B
    Environ Pollut; 2024 Mar; 344():123405. PubMed ID: 38244905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Novel approach for efficient predictions properties of large pool of nanomaterials based on limited set of species: nano-read-across.
    Gajewicz A; Cronin MT; Rasulev B; Leszczynski J; Puzyn T
    Nanotechnology; 2015 Jan; 26(1):015701. PubMed ID: 25473798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Nano-SAR Modeling for Predicting the Cytotoxicity of Metal Oxide Nanoparticles to PaCa2.
    Shi H; Pan Y; Yang F; Cao J; Tan X; Yuan B; Jiang J
    Molecules; 2021 Apr; 26(8):. PubMed ID: 33920258
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Evaluation criteria for the quality of published experimental data on nanomaterials and their usefulness for QSAR modelling.
    Lubinski L; Urbaszek P; Gajewicz A; Cronin MT; Enoch SJ; Madden JC; Leszczynska D; Leszczynski J; Puzyn T
    SAR QSAR Environ Res; 2013; 24(12):995-1008. PubMed ID: 24313439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. QSAR modeling of nanomaterials.
    Burello E; Worth AP
    Wiley Interdiscip Rev Nanomed Nanobiotechnol; 2011; 3(3):298-306. PubMed ID: 21384562
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. In silico analysis of nanomaterials hazard and risk.
    Cohen Y; Rallo R; Liu R; Liu HH
    Acc Chem Res; 2013 Mar; 46(3):802-12. PubMed ID: 23138971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Computational tool for risk assessment of nanomaterials: novel QSTR-perturbation model for simultaneous prediction of ecotoxicity and cytotoxicity of uncoated and coated nanoparticles under multiple experimental conditions.
    Kleandrova VV; Luan F; González-Díaz H; Ruso JM; Speck-Planche A; Cordeiro MN
    Environ Sci Technol; 2014 Dec; 48(24):14686-94. PubMed ID: 25384130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Nano-QSPR Modelling of Carbon-Based Nanomaterials Properties.
    Salahinejad M
    Curr Top Med Chem; 2015; 15(18):1868-86. PubMed ID: 25961518
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Use of size-dependent electron configuration fingerprint to develop general prediction models for nanomaterials.
    Shin HK; Kim S; Yoon S
    NanoImpact; 2021 Jan; 21():100298. PubMed ID: 35559785
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Quasi-QSAR for predicting the cell viability of human lung and skin cells exposed to different metal oxide nanomaterials.
    Choi JS; Trinh TX; Yoon TH; Kim J; Byun HG
    Chemosphere; 2019 Feb; 217():243-249. PubMed ID: 30419378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparing the CORAL and Random Forest approaches for modelling the in vitro cytotoxicity of silica nanomaterials.
    Cassano A; Marchese Robinson RL; Palczewska A; Puzyn T; Gajewicz A; Tran L; Manganelli S; Cronin MT
    Altern Lab Anim; 2016 Dec; 44(6):533-556. PubMed ID: 28094535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Advancing risk assessment of engineered nanomaterials: application of computational approaches.
    Gajewicz A; Rasulev B; Dinadayalane TC; Urbaszek P; Puzyn T; Leszczynska D; Leszczynski J
    Adv Drug Deliv Rev; 2012 Dec; 64(15):1663-93. PubMed ID: 22664229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 17.