BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

226 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31836167)

  • 1. Reducing estimated tail biting risk in German weaner pigs using a management tool.
    Grümpel A; Krieter J; Dippel S
    Vet J; 2019 Dec; 254():105406. PubMed ID: 31836167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Tail lesions in fattening pigs: relationships with postmortem meat inspection and influence of a tail biting management tool.
    Vom Brocke AL; Karnholz C; Madey-Rindermann D; Gauly M; Leeb C; Winckler C; Schrader L; Dippel S
    Animal; 2019 Apr; 13(4):835-844. PubMed ID: 30132431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A cross-sectional study for predicting tail biting risk in pig farms using classification and regression tree analysis.
    Scollo A; Gottardo F; Contiero B; Edwards SA
    Prev Vet Med; 2017 Oct; 146():114-120. PubMed ID: 28992915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Risk factors for tail lesions in undocked fattening pigs reared on Swiss farms.
    Sell A; Vidondo B; Wechsler B; Burla J; Nathues H
    Schweiz Arch Tierheilkd; 2020 Nov; 162(11):683-695. PubMed ID: 33140727
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Frequency of tail lesions and risk factors for tail biting in heavy pig production from weaning to 170 kg live weight.
    Scollo A; Contiero B; Gottardo F
    Vet J; 2016 Jan; 207():92-98. PubMed ID: 26626091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Can increased dietary fibre level and a single enrichment device reduce the risk of tail biting in undocked growing-finishing pigs in fully slatted systems?
    Chou JY; O'Driscoll K; Sandercock DA; D'Eath RB
    PLoS One; 2020; 15(10):e0241619. PubMed ID: 33125443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Damaging biting behaviors in intensively kept rearing gilts: the effect of jute sacks and relations with production characteristics.
    Ursinus WW; Wijnen HJ; Bartels AC; Dijvesteijn N; van Reenen CG; Bolhuis JE
    J Anim Sci; 2014 Nov; 92(11):5193-202. PubMed ID: 25253806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. More tail lesions among undocked than tail docked pigs in a conventional herd.
    Lahrmann HP; Busch ME; D'Eath RB; Forkman B; Hansen CF
    Animal; 2017 Oct; 11(10):1825-1831. PubMed ID: 28294097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Keeping pigs with undocked tails on conventionally producing farms. A feasibility study].
    Holling C; Tölle KH; Otto G; Blaha T
    Tierarztl Prax Ausg G Grosstiere Nutztiere; 2016 Oct; 44(5):296-306. PubMed ID: 27580118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Pig carcass tail lesions: the influence of record keeping through an advisory service and the relationship with farm performance parameters.
    van Staaveren N; Teixeira DL; Hanlon A; Boyle LA
    Animal; 2017 Jan; 11(1):140-146. PubMed ID: 27306695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A survey of straw use and tail biting in Swedish pig farms rearing undocked pigs.
    Wallgren T; Westin R; Gunnarsson S
    Acta Vet Scand; 2016 Dec; 58(1):84. PubMed ID: 27919291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Tear staining in pigs: a potential tool for welfare assessment on commercial farms.
    Telkänranta H; Marchant JN; Valros A
    Animal; 2016 Feb; 10(2):318-25. PubMed ID: 26303891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. An investigation into the effectiveness of compressed straw blocks in reducing abnormal behaviour in growing pigs.
    Haigh A; Yun-Chou J; O'Driscoll K
    Animal; 2019 Nov; 13(11):2576-2585. PubMed ID: 31062680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The effect of docking length on the risk of tail biting, tail-directed behaviour, aggression and activity level of growing pigs kept under commercial conditions.
    Thodberg K; Herskin MS; Jensen T; Jensen KH
    Animal; 2018 Dec; 12(12):2609-2618. PubMed ID: 29573756
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The 'Real Welfare' scheme: benchmarking welfare outcomes for commercially farmed pigs.
    Pandolfi F; Stoddart K; Wainwright N; Kyriazakis I; Edwards SA
    Animal; 2017 Oct; 11(10):1816-1824. PubMed ID: 28249629
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Prevalence of risk factors for tail biting on commercial farms and intervention strategies.
    Taylor NR; Parker RM; Mendl M; Edwards SA; Main DC
    Vet J; 2012 Oct; 194(1):77-83. PubMed ID: 22503206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Tail-biting: a new perspective.
    Taylor NR; Main DC; Mendl M; Edwards SA
    Vet J; 2010 Nov; 186(2):137-47. PubMed ID: 19804997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A case of tail-biting on a multi-site swine operation in Ontario.
    Henry M; O'Sullivan TL; Shoveller AK; Niel L; Friendship RM
    Can Vet J; 2022 Aug; 63(8):835-840. PubMed ID: 35919461
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Tail biting in pigs--causes and management intervention strategies to reduce the behavioural disorder. A review.
    Sonoda LT; Fels M; Oczak M; Vranken E; Ismayilova G; Guarino M; Viazzi S; Bahr C; Berckmans D; Hartung J
    Berl Munch Tierarztl Wochenschr; 2013; 126(3-4):104-12. PubMed ID: 23540192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Validation of carcass lesions as indicators for on-farm health and welfare of pigs.
    van Staaveren N; Doyle B; Manzanilla EG; Calderón Díaz JA; Hanlon A; Boyle LA
    J Anim Sci; 2017 Apr; 95(4):1528-1536. PubMed ID: 28464078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.