These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

150 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31836622)

  • 21. Defending the two tragedies argument: a response to Simkulet.
    Friberg-Fernros H
    J Med Ethics; 2019 Jun; 45(6):417-418. PubMed ID: 31092630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Taking precautionary concerns seriously: a defense of a misused anti-abortion argument.
    Friberg-Fernros H
    J Med Philos; 2014 Jun; 39(3):228-47. PubMed ID: 24793317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. The Identity Objection to the future-like-ours argument.
    Brill S
    Bioethics; 2019 Feb; 33(2):287-293. PubMed ID: 30480832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Deprivations, futures and the wrongness of killing.
    Marquis D
    J Med Ethics; 2001 Dec; 27(6):363-9. PubMed ID: 11731597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Strengthened impairment argument does not restate Marquis.
    Blackshaw BP
    J Med Ethics; 2021 Mar; ():. PubMed ID: 33687914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Parthenogenesis, identity, and value.
    Simkulet W
    Bioethics; 2024 Jun; 38(5):419-424. PubMed ID: 38652592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Within the limits of the defensible: a response to Simkulet's argument against the pro-life view on the basis of spontaneous abortion.
    Friberg-Fernros H
    J Med Ethics; 2018 Nov; 44(11):743-745. PubMed ID: 30065111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Responding to Simkulet's objections to the two tragedies argument.
    Friberg-Fernros H
    J Med Ethics; 2020 Mar; 46(3):223-224. PubMed ID: 31699810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Can the Future-Like-Ours Argument Survive Ontological Scrutiny?
    Adams M; Rimell N
    J Med Philos; 2022 Nov; 47(5):667-680. PubMed ID: 34655219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Two puzzles for Marquis's conservative view on abortion.
    Card RF
    Bioethics; 2006 Sep; 20(5):264-77. PubMed ID: 17100010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. The impairment argument for the immorality of abortion revisited.
    Blackshaw BP
    Bioethics; 2020 Feb; 34(2):211-213. PubMed ID: 31788824
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Abortion, value and the sanctity of life.
    Belshaw C
    Bioethics; 1997 Apr; 11(2):130-50. PubMed ID: 11654792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Savulescu's objections to the future of value argument.
    Marquis D
    J Med Ethics; 2005 Feb; 31(2):119-22. PubMed ID: 15681684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Why the immorality of consuming alcohol during pregnancy cannot tell us that abortion is immoral: A reply to Hendricks.
    Lundgren B
    Bioethics; 2021 May; 35(4):388-389. PubMed ID: 33655514
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. The morality of abortion and the deprivation of futures.
    Brown MT
    J Med Ethics; 2000 Apr; 26(2):103-7. PubMed ID: 10786320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Broadening the future of value account of the wrongness of killing.
    Di Nucci E
    Med Health Care Philos; 2015 Nov; 18(4):587-90. PubMed ID: 25608793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. On how to interpret the role of the future within the abortion debate.
    Di Nucci E
    J Med Ethics; 2009 Oct; 35(10):651-2. PubMed ID: 19793949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. The Two tragedies argument.
    Simkulet W
    J Med Ethics; 2019 May; 45(5):304-308. PubMed ID: 30796091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Abortion--Catholic pluralism and the potential for dialogue.
    Kaufman PS
    Cross Curr; 1987; 37(1):76-8. PubMed ID: 11658923
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Derivative deprivation and the wrong of abortion.
    Stratton-Lake P
    Bioethics; 2021 Mar; 35(3):277-283. PubMed ID: 33368424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.