119 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3183678)
1. Revision of nonseptic, loose, cemented femoral components using modern cementing techniques.
Rubash HE; Harris WH
J Arthroplasty; 1988; 3(3):241-8. PubMed ID: 3183678
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Revision of a failed cemented total hip prosthesis with insertion of an acetabular component without cement and a femoral component with cement. A five to eight-year follow-up study.
Weber KL; Callaghan JJ; Goetz DD; Johnston RC
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 1996 Jul; 78(7):982-94. PubMed ID: 8698734
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Primary hybrid total hip replacement, performed with insertion of the acetabular component without cement and a precoat femoral component with cement. An average ten-year follow-up study.
Clohisy JC; Harris WH
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 1999 Feb; 81(2):247-55. PubMed ID: 10073588
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Total hip arthroplasty with use of so-called second-generation cementing techniques. A fifteen-year-average follow-up study.
Mulroy WF; Estok DM; Harris WH
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 1995 Dec; 77(12):1845-52. PubMed ID: 8550652
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Total hip arthroplasty with use of second-generation cementing techniques. An eighteen-year-average follow-up study.
Smith SW; Estok DM; Harris WH
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 1998 Nov; 80(11):1632-40. PubMed ID: 9840632
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Cemented revision of failed uncemented femoral components of total hip arthroplasty.
Davis CM; Berry DJ; Harmsen WS
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2003 Jul; 85(7):1264-9. PubMed ID: 12851351
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Hybrid total hip arthroplasty with a precoated offset stem. Four to nine-year results.
Cannestra VP; Berger RA; Quigley LR; Jacobs JJ; Rosenberg AG; Galante JO
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2000 Sep; 82(9):1291-9. PubMed ID: 11005520
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Charnley total hip arthroplasty with use of improved techniques of cementing. The results after a minimum of fifteen years of follow-up.
Madey SM; Callaghan JJ; Olejniczak JP; Goetz DD; Johnston RC
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 1997 Jan; 79(1):53-64. PubMed ID: 9010186
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Results of revision for mechanical failure after cemented total hip replacement, 1979 to 1982. A two to five-year follow-up.
Callaghan JJ; Salvati EA; Pellicci PM; Wilson PD; Ranawat CS
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 1985 Sep; 67(7):1074-85. PubMed ID: 4030826
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Femoral revision total hip arthroplasty using a long-stem femoral component. Clinical and radiographic analysis.
Turner RH; Mattingly DA; Scheller A
J Arthroplasty; 1987; 2(3):247-58. PubMed ID: 3668554
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The bone-vacuum cementing technique for the fixation of the stem in total hip arthroplasty.
Pitto RP; Kessler M; Schikora N; di Muria GV
Chir Organi Mov; 2001; 86(2):99-110. PubMed ID: 12025052
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Total hip arthroplasty with a cemented, polished, collared femoral stem and a cementless acetabular component. A follow-up study at a minimum of ten years.
Firestone DE; Callaghan JJ; Liu SS; Goetz DD; Sullivan PM; Vittetoe DA; Johnston RC
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2007 Jan; 89(1):126-32. PubMed ID: 17200319
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Mode of loosening of matt-finished femoral stems in primary total hip replacement.
Behairy YM; Harris WH
Saudi Med J; 2002 Oct; 23(10):1187-94. PubMed ID: 12436120
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Proximal femoral allografts for reconstruction of bone stock in revision arthroplasty of the hip. A nine to fifteen-year follow-up.
Blackley HR; Davis AM; Hutchison CR; Gross AE
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2001 Mar; 83(3):346-54. PubMed ID: 11263637
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Cemented total hip arthroplasty following previous femoral osteotomy: an average 16-year follow-up study.
Shinar AA; Harris WH
J Arthroplasty; 1998 Apr; 13(3):243-53. PubMed ID: 9590634
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Long-term results of cemented femoral revision surgery using second-generation techniques. An average 11.7-year follow-up evaluation.
Estok DM; Harris WH
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1994 Feb; (299):190-202. PubMed ID: 8119017
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The Harris-Galante porous-coated acetabular component with screw fixation. An average ten-year follow-up study.
Clohisy JC; Harris WH
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 1999 Jan; 81(1):66-73. PubMed ID: 9973056
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Poldi-Čech cemented femoral stem in total hip arthroplasty after 25 years].
Rozkydal Z; Janíček P
Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech; 2010 Aug; 77(4):284-90. PubMed ID: 21059325
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The porous-coated anatomic total hip prosthesis, inserted without cement. A prospective study with a minimum of ten years of follow-up.
Xenos JS; Callaghan JJ; Heekin RD; Hopkinson WJ; Savory CG; Moore MS
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 1999 Jan; 81(1):74-82. PubMed ID: 9973057
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Primary total hip replacement with insertion of an acetabular component without cement and a femoral component with cement. Follow-up study at an average of six years.
Woolson ST; Haber DF
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 1996 May; 78(5):698-705. PubMed ID: 8642026
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
