111 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31836891)
41. Validation of calculation algorithms for organ doses in CT by measurements on a 5 year old paediatric phantom.
Dabin J; Mencarelli A; McMillan D; Romanyukha A; Struelens L; Lee C
Phys Med Biol; 2016 Jun; 61(11):4168-82. PubMed ID: 27192093
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Image quality and age-specific dose estimation in head and chest CT examinations with organ-based tube-current modulation.
Yamauchi-Kawaura C; Yamauchi M; Imai K; Ikeda M; Aoyama T
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2013 Dec; 157(2):193-205. PubMed ID: 23734058
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. How have advances in CT dosimetry software impacted estimates of CT radiation dose and cancer incidence? A comparison of CT dosimetry software: Implications for past and future research.
Maxwell S; Fox R; McRobbie D; Bulsara M; Doust J; O'Leary P; Slavotinek J; Stubbs J; Moorin R
PLoS One; 2019; 14(8):e0217816. PubMed ID: 31412037
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Utilizing a simple CT dosimetry phantom for the comprehension of the operational characteristics of CT AEC systems.
Tsalafoutas IA; Varsamidis A; Thalassinou S; Efstathopoulos EP
Med Phys; 2013 Nov; 40(11):111918. PubMed ID: 24320451
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Use of lead shields for radiation protection of superficial organs in patients undergoing head CT examinations.
Ngaile JE; Uiso CB; Msaki P; Kazema R
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2008; 130(4):490-8. PubMed ID: 18375945
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. A strategy to optimize radiation exposure for non-contrast head CT: comparison with the Japanese diagnostic reference levels.
Kumamaru KK; Kogure Y; Suzuki M; Hori M; Nakanishi A; Kamagata K; Hagiwara A; Andica C; Ri K; Houshido N; Aoki S
Jpn J Radiol; 2016 Jun; 34(6):451-7. PubMed ID: 27097808
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. TLD measurements and Monte Carlo calculations of head and neck organ and effective doses for cone beam computed tomography using 3D Accuitomo 170.
Ernst M; Manser P; Dula K; Volken W; Stampanoni MF; Fix MK
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2017 Oct; 46(7):20170047. PubMed ID: 28749697
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Automatic Tube Current Modulation and Tube Voltage Selection in Pediatric Computed Tomography: A Phantom Study on Radiation Dose and Image Quality.
Papadakis AE; Damilakis J
Invest Radiol; 2019 May; 54(5):265-272. PubMed ID: 30562273
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Influence of phantom diameter, kVp and scan mode upon computed tomography dose index.
Nickoloff EL; Dutta AK; Lu ZF
Med Phys; 2003 Mar; 30(3):395-402. PubMed ID: 12674240
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Novel methods of measuring single scan dose profiles and cumulative dose in CT.
Nakonechny KD; Fallone BG; Rathee S
Med Phys; 2005 Jan; 32(1):98-109. PubMed ID: 15719960
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF ORGAN DOSES ASSESSMENT FOR PATIENTS UNDERGOING CONVENTIONAL X-RAY EXAMINATIONS: PHANTOM EXPERIMENTS VS. CALCULATIONS.
Golikov V; Barkovsky A; Wallstrom E; Cederblad Å
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2018 Jan; 178(2):223-234. PubMed ID: 28981902
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. On the use of pediatric phantoms in the dose evaluation during computed tomography (CT) thorax examinations.
Giacco G; Cannata V; Furetta C; Santopietro F; Fariello G
Med Phys; 2001 Feb; 28(2):199-204. PubMed ID: 11243344
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Comparison of organ dosimetry methods and effective dose calculation methods for paediatric CT.
Brady Z; Cain TM; Johnston PN
Australas Phys Eng Sci Med; 2012 Jun; 35(2):117-34. PubMed ID: 22492218
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Radiation dose dependence on subject size in abdominal computed tomography: Water phantom and patient model comparison.
Li X; Yang K; Liu B
Med Phys; 2018 May; 45(5):2309-2317. PubMed ID: 29582439
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Dose reduction using bismuth shielding during paediatric CT examinations in Slovakia.
Gbelcová L; Nikodemová D; Horváthová M
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2011 Sep; 147(1-2):160-3. PubMed ID: 21816728
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. CT head-scan dosimetry in an anthropomorphic phantom and associated measurement of ACR accreditation-phantom imaging metrics under clinically representative scan conditions.
Brunner CC; Stern SH; Minniti R; Parry MI; Skopec M; Chakrabarti K
Med Phys; 2013 Aug; 40(8):081917. PubMed ID: 23927331
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Organ Dose Evaluations Based on Monte Carlo Simulation for CT Examinations Using Tube Current Modulation.
Fujii K; Nomura K; Muramatsu Y; Obara S; Akahane K; Kusumoto M
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2017 Apr; 174(3):387-394. PubMed ID: 27342451
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Organ and effective dose evaluation in coronary angiography by using a 320 MDCT based on in-phantom dose measurements with TLDs.
Lu H; Zhuo W; Xu B; Wang M
J Radiol Prot; 2015 Sep; 35(3):597-609. PubMed ID: 26180015
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Dose distribution in pediatric CT head examination using a new phantom with radiochromic film.
Gotanda R; Katsuda T; Gotanda T; Tabuchi A; Yatake H; Takeda Y
Australas Phys Eng Sci Med; 2008 Dec; 31(4):339-44. PubMed ID: 19239061
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. Computed tomography for cervical spine trauma. The impact of MDCT on fracture detection and dose deposition.
Chan PN; Antonio GE; Griffith JF; Yu KW; Rainer TH; Ahuja AT
Emerg Radiol; 2005 Jul; 11(5):286-90. PubMed ID: 16133623
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
