These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

234 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31838116)

  • 21. Impact of fully automated assessment on interstudy reproducibility of biventricular volumes and function in cardiac magnetic resonance imaging.
    Backhaus SJ; Schuster A; Lange T; Stehning C; Billing M; Lotz J; Pieske B; Hasenfuß G; Kelle S; Kowallick JT
    Sci Rep; 2021 Jun; 11(1):11648. PubMed ID: 34078942
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Simultaneous strain-volume analysis by three-dimensional echocardiography: validation in normal subjects with tagging cardiac magnetic resonance.
    Lilli A; Tessa C; Diciotti S; Croisille P; Clarysse P; Del Meglio J; Salvatori L; Vignali C; Casolo G
    J Cardiovasc Med (Hagerstown); 2017 Apr; 18(4):223-229. PubMed ID: 26702593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Validity of automated measurement of left ventricular ejection fraction and volume using the Philips EPIQ system.
    Hovnanians N; Win T; Makkiya M; Zheng Q; Taub C
    Echocardiography; 2017 Nov; 34(11):1575-1583. PubMed ID: 28994128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Reliability and reproducibility of quantitative assessment of left ventricular function and volumes with 3-slice segmentation of cine steady-state free precession short axis images.
    Nguyen C; Kuoy E; Ruehm S; Krishnam M
    Eur J Radiol; 2015 Jul; 84(7):1249-58. PubMed ID: 25956492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. A dual propagation contours technique for semi-automated assessment of systolic and diastolic cardiac function by CMR.
    Feng W; Nagaraj H; Gupta H; Lloyd SG; Aban I; Perry GJ; Calhoun DA; Dell'Italia LJ; Denney TS
    J Cardiovasc Magn Reson; 2009 Aug; 11(1):30. PubMed ID: 19674481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Three-dimensional full automated software in the evaluation of the left ventricle function: from theory to clinical practice.
    Barletta V; Hinojar R; Carbonell A; González-Gómez A; Fabiani I; Di Bello V; Jiménez-Nacher JJ; Zamorano J; Fernández-Golfín C
    Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2018 Aug; 34(8):1205-1213. PubMed ID: 29605902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Feasibility, accuracy, and reproducibility of real-time full-volume 3D transthoracic echocardiography to measure LV volumes and systolic function: a fully automated endocardial contouring algorithm in sinus rhythm and atrial fibrillation.
    Thavendiranathan P; Liu S; Verhaert D; Calleja A; Nitinunu A; Van Houten T; De Michelis N; Simonetti O; Rajagopalan S; Ryan T; Vannan MA
    JACC Cardiovasc Imaging; 2012 Mar; 5(3):239-51. PubMed ID: 22421168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Development and evaluation of a semiautomatic segmentation method for the estimation of LV parameters on cine MR images.
    Mazonakis M; Grinias E; Pagonidis K; Tziritas G; Damilakis J
    Phys Med Biol; 2010 Feb; 55(4):1127-40. PubMed ID: 20107252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Accuracy and reproducibility of quantitation of left ventricular function by real-time three-dimensional echocardiography versus cardiac magnetic resonance.
    Soliman OI; Kirschbaum SW; van Dalen BM; van der Zwaan HB; Mahdavian Delavary B; Vletter WB; van Geuns RJ; Ten Cate FJ; Geleijnse ML
    Am J Cardiol; 2008 Sep; 102(6):778-83. PubMed ID: 18774006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Realization of fully automated quantification of left ventricular volumes and systolic function using transthoracic 3D echocardiography.
    Sun L; Feng H; Ni L; Wang H; Gao D
    Cardiovasc Ultrasound; 2018 Jan; 16(1):2. PubMed ID: 29357888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. [Evaluation of the clinical suitability of automated left ventricle's fraction and volume measurements in 3-dimensional echocardiography compared to values obtained in magnetic resonance imaging (pilot study)].
    Żygadło A; Kaźnica-Wiatr M; Błaut-Jurkowska J; Knap K; Lenart-Migdalska A; Smaś-Suska M; Skubera M; Urbańczyk-Zawadzka M; Podolec P; Olszowska M
    Pol Merkur Lekarski; 2017 Oct; 43(256):154-157. PubMed ID: 29084187
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Clinical utility of automated assessment of left ventricular ejection fraction using artificial intelligence-assisted border detection.
    Rahmouni HW; Ky B; Plappert T; Duffy K; Wiegers SE; Ferrari VA; Keane MG; Kirkpatrick JN; Silvestry FE; St John Sutton M
    Am Heart J; 2008 Mar; 155(3):562-70. PubMed ID: 18294497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Deep Learning-Based Automated Echocardiographic Quantification of Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction: A Point-of-Care Solution.
    Asch FM; Mor-Avi V; Rubenson D; Goldstein S; Saric M; Mikati I; Surette S; Chaudhry A; Poilvert N; Hong H; Horowitz R; Park D; Diaz-Gomez JL; Boesch B; Nikravan S; Liu RB; Philips C; Thomas JD; Martin RP; Lang RM
    Circ Cardiovasc Imaging; 2021 Jun; 14(6):e012293. PubMed ID: 34126754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Objective selection of short-axis slices for automated quantification of left ventricular size and function by cardiovascular magnetic resonance.
    Marino M; Corsi C; Maffessanti F; Patel AR; Mor-Avi V
    Clin Imaging; 2016; 40(4):617-23. PubMed ID: 27317206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Automated segmentation of routine clinical cardiac magnetic resonance imaging for assessment of left ventricular diastolic dysfunction.
    Kawaji K; Codella NC; Prince MR; Chu CW; Shakoor A; LaBounty TM; Min JK; Swaminathan RV; Devereux RB; Wang Y; Weinsaft JW
    Circ Cardiovasc Imaging; 2009 Nov; 2(6):476-84. PubMed ID: 19920046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Performance of Automated Software in the Assessment of Segmental Left Ventricular Function in Cardiac CT: Comparison with Cardiac Magnetic Resonance.
    Wang R; Meinel FG; Schoepf UJ; Canstein C; Spearman JV; De Cecco CN
    Eur Radiol; 2015 Dec; 25(12):3560-6. PubMed ID: 25925355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Multi-detector row cardiac computed tomography accurately quantifies right and left ventricular size and function compared with cardiac magnetic resonance.
    Raman SV; Shah M; McCarthy B; Garcia A; Ferketich AK
    Am Heart J; 2006 Mar; 151(3):736-44. PubMed ID: 16504643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Feasibility of single-beat full-volume capture real-time three-dimensional echocardiography and auto-contouring algorithm for quantification of left ventricular volume: validation with cardiac magnetic resonance imaging.
    Chang SA; Lee SC; Kim EY; Hahm SH; Jang SY; Park SJ; Choi JO; Park SW; Choe YH; Oh JK
    J Am Soc Echocardiogr; 2011 Aug; 24(8):853-9. PubMed ID: 21645992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Intervendor Consistency and Accuracy of Left Ventricular Volume Measurements Using Three-Dimensional Echocardiography.
    Muraru D; Cecchetto A; Cucchini U; Zhou X; Lang RM; Romeo G; Vannan M; Mihaila S; Miglioranza MH; Iliceto S; Badano LP
    J Am Soc Echocardiogr; 2018 Feb; 31(2):158-168.e1. PubMed ID: 29229493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Automated left and right ventricular chamber segmentation in cardiac magnetic resonance images using dense fully convolutional neural network.
    Penso M; Moccia S; Scafuri S; Muscogiuri G; Pontone G; Pepi M; Caiani EG
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2021 Jun; 204():106059. PubMed ID: 33812305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.