These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

173 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31838247)

  • 1. Neurocognitive processes underlying heuristic and normative probability judgments.
    Andersson L; Eriksson J; Stillesjö S; Juslin P; Nyberg L; Wirebring LK
    Cognition; 2020 Mar; 196():104153. PubMed ID: 31838247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Representativeness and conjoint probability.
    Gavanski I; Roskos-Ewoldsen DR
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 1991 Aug; 61(2):181-94. PubMed ID: 1920061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Exemplars in the mist: the cognitive substrate of the representativeness heuristic.
    Nilsson H; Juslin P; Olsson H
    Scand J Psychol; 2008 Jun; 49(3):201-12. PubMed ID: 18419587
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Heuristic decision-making across adulthood.
    Taylor MK; Marsh EJ; Samanez-Larkin GR
    Psychol Aging; 2023 Sep; 38(6):508-518. PubMed ID: 36757964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A Similarity-Based Process for Human Judgment in the Parietal Cortex.
    Wirebring LK; Stillesjö S; Eriksson J; Juslin P; Nyberg L
    Front Hum Neurosci; 2018; 12():481. PubMed ID: 30631267
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The Influence of Effortful Thought and Cognitive Proficiencies on the Conjunction Fallacy: Implications for Dual-Process Theories of Reasoning and Judgment.
    Scherer LD; Yates JF; Baker SG; Valentine KD
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2017 Jun; 43(6):874-887. PubMed ID: 28903676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. On the determinants of the conjunction fallacy: probability versus inductive confirmation.
    Tentori K; Crupi V; Russo S
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2013 Feb; 142(1):235-255. PubMed ID: 22823498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. How the expertise heuristic accelerates decision-making and credibility judgments in social media by means of effort reduction.
    Meinert J; Krämer NC
    PLoS One; 2022; 17(3):e0264428. PubMed ID: 35294474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A quantum theory account of order effects and conjunction fallacies in political judgments.
    Yearsley JM; Trueblood JS
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2018 Aug; 25(4):1517-1525. PubMed ID: 28879495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Neural substrates of similarity and rule-based strategies in judgment.
    von Helversen B; Karlsson L; Rasch B; Rieskamp J
    Front Hum Neurosci; 2014; 8():809. PubMed ID: 25360099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Quantifying Heuristic Bias: Anchoring, Availability, and Representativeness.
    Richie M; Josephson SA
    Teach Learn Med; 2018; 30(1):67-75. PubMed ID: 28753383
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Brain network dynamics underlying visuospatial judgment: an FMRI connectivity study.
    de Graaf TA; Roebroeck A; Goebel R; Sack AT
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2010 Sep; 22(9):2012-26. PubMed ID: 19803683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. How heuristic credibility cues affect credibility judgments and decisions.
    Gugerty L; Link DM
    J Exp Psychol Appl; 2020 Dec; 26(4):620-645. PubMed ID: 32658526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The development of the representativeness heuristic in young children.
    Gualtieri S; Denison S
    J Exp Child Psychol; 2018 Oct; 174():60-76. PubMed ID: 29913307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Quantum Cognition.
    Pothos EM; Busemeyer JR
    Annu Rev Psychol; 2022 Jan; 73():749-778. PubMed ID: 34546804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Perceptions of randomness in binary sequences: Normative, heuristic, or both?
    Reimers S; Donkin C; Le Pelley ME
    Cognition; 2018 Mar; 172():11-25. PubMed ID: 29202364
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Heuristic decision making.
    Gigerenzer G; Gaissmaier W
    Annu Rev Psychol; 2011; 62():451-82. PubMed ID: 21126183
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. People's conditional probability judgments follow probability theory (plus noise).
    Costello F; Watts P
    Cogn Psychol; 2016 Sep; 89():106-33. PubMed ID: 27570097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Is there something special with probabilities?--insight vs. computational ability in multiple risk combination.
    Juslin P; Lindskog M; Mayerhofer B
    Cognition; 2015 Mar; 136():282-303. PubMed ID: 25514208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Investigating the Neural Correlates of the Affect Heuristic Using Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging.
    Skagerlund K; Skagenholt M; Hamilton JP; Slovic P; Västfjäll D
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2021 Oct; 33(11):2265-2278. PubMed ID: 34272946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.