These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

154 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31838247)

  • 21. Assessing the use of cognitive heuristic representativeness in clinical reasoning.
    Payne VL; Crowley RS
    AMIA Annu Symp Proc; 2008 Nov; 2008():571-5. PubMed ID: 18999140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. The conjunction fallacy, confirmation, and quantum theory: comment on Tentori, Crupi, and Russo (2013).
    Busemeyer JR; Wang Z; Pothos EM; Trueblood JS
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2015 Feb; 144(1):236-43. PubMed ID: 25621376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Intuitive and deliberate judgments are based on common principles.
    Kruglanski AW; Gigerenzer G
    Psychol Rev; 2011 Jan; 118(1):97-109. PubMed ID: 21244188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Heuristic and linear models of judgment: matching rules and environments.
    Hogarth RM; Karelaia N
    Psychol Rev; 2007 Jul; 114(3):733-58. PubMed ID: 17638504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Heuristic decision-making across adulthood.
    Taylor MK; Marsh EJ; Samanez-Larkin GR
    Psychol Aging; 2023 Sep; 38(6):508-518. PubMed ID: 36757964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Imaging the brain activity changes underlying impaired visuospatial judgments: simultaneous FMRI, TMS, and behavioral studies.
    Sack AT; Kohler A; Bestmann S; Linden DE; Dechent P; Goebel R; Baudewig J
    Cereb Cortex; 2007 Dec; 17(12):2841-52. PubMed ID: 17337745
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Source reliability and the conjunction fallacy.
    Jarvstad A; Hahn U
    Cogn Sci; 2011; 35(4):682-711. PubMed ID: 21564268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. The Bayesian sampler: Generic Bayesian inference causes incoherence in human probability judgments.
    Zhu JQ; Sanborn AN; Chater N
    Psychol Rev; 2020 Oct; 127(5):719-748. PubMed ID: 32191073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Double Conjunction Fallacies in Physicians' Probability Judgment.
    Crupi V; Elia F; Aprà F; Tentori K
    Med Decis Making; 2018 Aug; 38(6):756-760. PubMed ID: 29978726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Conflict and bias in heuristic judgment.
    Bhatia S
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2017 Feb; 43(2):319-325. PubMed ID: 27685023
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Anchoring and Judgment Bias: Disregarding Under Uncertainty.
    Berg SA; Moss JH
    Psychol Rep; 2022 Oct; 125(5):2688-2708. PubMed ID: 34039105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Surprisingly rational: probability theory plus noise explains biases in judgment.
    Costello F; Watts P
    Psychol Rev; 2014 Jul; 121(3):463-80. PubMed ID: 25090427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Greater activation in left hemisphere language-related regions during simple judgment tasks among substance-dependent patients in treatment for alcoholism.
    Gilman JM; Davis MB; Hommer DW
    Alcohol Clin Exp Res; 2010 Feb; 34(2):331-41. PubMed ID: 19951293
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. The Development of Nonsymbolic Probability Judgments in Children.
    O'Grady S; Xu F
    Child Dev; 2020 May; 91(3):784-798. PubMed ID: 30737769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Neural correlates of audiovisual temporal processing--comparison of temporal order and simultaneity judgments.
    Binder M
    Neuroscience; 2015 Aug; 300():432-47. PubMed ID: 25982561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Heuristic reasoning and cognitive biases: Are they hindrances to judgments and decision making in orthodontics?
    Hicks EP; Kluemper GT
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2011 Mar; 139(3):297-304. PubMed ID: 21392683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Parallel Interactive Processing as a Way to Understand Complex Information Processing: The Conjunction Fallacy and Other Examples.
    Nahinsky ID
    Am J Psychol; 2017 Summer; 130(2):201-222. PubMed ID: 29461716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Judgments under uncertainty: representativeness or potential surprise?
    Fisk JE
    Br J Psychol; 2002 Nov; 93(Pt 4):431-49. PubMed ID: 12519527
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. The memory state heuristic: A formal model based on repeated recognition judgments.
    Castela M; Erdfelder E
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2017 Feb; 43(2):205-225. PubMed ID: 27632560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Probability error in diagnosis: the conjunction fallacy among beginning medical students.
    Rao G
    Fam Med; 2009 Apr; 41(4):262-5. PubMed ID: 19343556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.