These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

99 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3183867)

  • 1. Quantitative and mechanistic measurements of container/closure integrity: viscoelastic measurements of elastomeric closures.
    Morton DK; Lordi NG
    J Parenter Sci Technol; 1988; 42(4):127-41. PubMed ID: 3183867
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Quantitative and mechanistic measurements of parenteral vial container/closure integrity. Leakage quantitation.
    Morton DK; Lordi NG; Ambrosio TJ
    J Parenter Sci Technol; 1989; 43(2):88-97. PubMed ID: 2709241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Validation of elastomeric closures for parenteral use: an overview.
    Wood RT
    J Parenter Drug Assoc; 1980; 34(4):286-94. PubMed ID: 6902776
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Recommended testing methodology for rubber closures.
    Hilty WW
    Bull Parenter Drug Assoc; 1968; 22(2):76-81. PubMed ID: 5649569
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Extraction rates of marker compounds from rubber closures for parenteral use. II. mechanism of extraction and evaluation of select extraction parameters.
    Boyett JB; Avis KE
    Bull Parenter Drug Assoc; 1976; 30(4):169-79. PubMed ID: 953369
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Quantifying the Vial Capping Process: Residual Seal Force and Container Closure Integrity.
    Ovadia R; Streubel A; Webb-Vargas Y; Ulland L; Luemkemann J; Rauch K; Eder J; Lam P; Tegoulia V; Maa YF
    PDA J Pharm Sci Technol; 2019; 73(1):2-15. PubMed ID: 29954924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Rubber closures for freeze-dried products.
    Hopkins GH
    Dev Biol Stand; 1976 Oct; 36():139-44. PubMed ID: 1030412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Quantitative and mechanistic measurements of container/closure integrity. Bubble, liquid, and microbial leakage tests.
    Morton DK; Lordi NG; Troutman LH; Ambrosio TJ
    J Parenter Sci Technol; 1989; 43(3):104-8. PubMed ID: 2732847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Time-Dependent Testing Evaluation and Modeling for Rubber Stopper Seal Performance.
    Zeng Q; Zhao X
    PDA J Pharm Sci Technol; 2018; 72(2):134-148. PubMed ID: 29158288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Time Temperature Superposition Evaluation and Modeling for Container Closure System's Seal Performance at Low Temperatures.
    Zeng Q; Bucci A; Ho L
    PDA J Pharm Sci Technol; 2020; 74(1):27-40. PubMed ID: 31308066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Impact of Vial Capping on Residual Seal Force and Container Closure Integrity.
    Mathaes R; Mahler HC; Roggo Y; Ovadia R; Lam P; Stauch O; Vogt M; Roehl H; Huwyler J; Mohl S; Streubel A
    PDA J Pharm Sci Technol; 2016; 70(1):12-29. PubMed ID: 26889053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Influence of Different Container Closure Systems and Capping Process Parameters on Product Quality and Container Closure Integrity (CCI) in GMP Drug Product Manufacturing.
    Mathaes R; Mahler HC; Roggo Y; Huwyler J; Eder J; Fritsch K; Posset T; Mohl S; Streubel A
    PDA J Pharm Sci Technol; 2016; 70(2):109-19. PubMed ID: 26797971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Panel discussion: impact of changes of rubber formulations. II. Changes in accelerators.
    Greene GE
    J Parenter Drug Assoc; 1978; 32(1):37-9. PubMed ID: 246926
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Panel discussion: impact of changes of rubber formulations. III. Impact on the end user.
    Grimes TL
    J Parenter Drug Assoc; 1978; 32(1):40-3. PubMed ID: 246927
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Panel discussion: impact of changes of rubber formulations. I. Potential impact of changes in raw material availability and performance criteria.
    Keim FM
    J Parenter Drug Assoc; 1978; 32(1):33-6. PubMed ID: 246925
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Artificial Leaks in Container Closure Integrity Testing: Nonlinear Finite Element Simulation of Aperture Size Originated by a Copper Wire Sandwiched between the Stopper and the Glass Vial.
    Nieto A; Roehl H; Brown H; Adler M; Chalus P; Mahler HC
    PDA J Pharm Sci Technol; 2016; 70(4):313-24. PubMed ID: 27020649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Long-Term Study of Container Closure Integrity of Rubber-Glass Vial Systems by Multiple Methods.
    Gehrmann MR; Mcandrew TP
    PDA J Pharm Sci Technol; 2020; 74(1):147-161. PubMed ID: 31420507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Rubber stopper and component identification using syringeless gas chromatography.
    Mattson LN; Gaebler RN; Giebe KE; Peppers RE
    J Parenter Drug Assoc; 1980; 34(6):436-46. PubMed ID: 6906366
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. European test methods for rubber closures.
    Brinkhoff O
    Bull Parenter Drug Assoc; 1969; 23(3):114-8. PubMed ID: 5807464
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A new method for the extraction of soluble aluminum from chlorobutyl rubber closures.
    Mondimore D; Moore C
    J Parenter Sci Technol; 1983; 37(3):79-81. PubMed ID: 6875744
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.