143 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31839175)
1. Is the involvement of the hepatic artery lymph node a poor prognostic factor in pancreatic adenocarcinoma?
Rodrigues V; Dopazo C; Pando E; Blanco L; Caralt M; Gómez-Gavara C; Bilbao I; Salcedo MT; Balsells J; Charco R
Cir Esp (Engl Ed); 2020 Apr; 98(4):204-211. PubMed ID: 31839175
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Hepatic arterial nodal metastases in pancreatic cancer: is this the node of importance?
LaFemina J; Chou JF; Gönen M; Rocha FG; Correa-Gallego C; Kingham TP; Fong Y; D'Angelica MI; Jarnagin WR; DeMatteo RP; Allen PJ
J Gastrointest Surg; 2013 Jun; 17(6):1092-7. PubMed ID: 23588624
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The role of hepatic artery lymph node in pancreatic adenocarcinoma: prognostic factor or a selection criterion for surgery.
Philips P; Dunki-Jacobs E; Agle SC; Scoggins C; McMasters KM; Martin RC
HPB (Oxford); 2014 Dec; 16(12):1051-5. PubMed ID: 25123504
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Survival impact based on hepatic artery lymph node status in pancreatic adenocarcinoma: A study of patients receiving modern chemotherapy.
Perlmutter BC; Hossain MS; Naples R; Tu C; Vilchez V; McMichael J; Tullio K; Simon R; Walsh RM; Augustin T
J Surg Oncol; 2021 Feb; 123(2):399-406. PubMed ID: 33159317
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Para-aortic node involvement is not an independent predictor of survival after resection for pancreatic cancer.
Sperti C; Gruppo M; Blandamura S; Valmasoni M; Pozza G; Passuello N; Beltrame V; Moletta L
World J Gastroenterol; 2017 Jun; 23(24):4399-4406. PubMed ID: 28706422
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The lymph node ratio is the strongest prognostic factor after resection of pancreatic cancer.
Riediger H; Keck T; Wellner U; zur Hausen A; Adam U; Hopt UT; Makowiec F
J Gastrointest Surg; 2009 Jul; 13(7):1337-44. PubMed ID: 19418101
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Lymph node ratio is an independent prognostic factor after resection of periampullary malignancies: data from a tertiary referral center in the middle East.
Shamseddine AI; Mukherji D; Melki C; Elias E; Eloubeidi M; Dimassi H; Khalife M; Abou-Alfa G; O'Reilly E; Faraj W
Am J Clin Oncol; 2014 Feb; 37(1):13-8. PubMed ID: 23111358
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Pattern of lymph node involvement and prognosis in pancreatic adenocarcinoma: direct lymph node invasion has similar survival to node-negative disease.
Pai RK; Beck AH; Mitchem J; Linehan DC; Chang DT; Norton JA; Pai RK
Am J Surg Pathol; 2011 Feb; 35(2):228-34. PubMed ID: 21263243
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Nodal counts and lymph node ratio impact survival after distal pancreatectomy for pancreatic adenocarcinoma.
Ashfaq A; Pockaj BA; Gray RJ; Halfdanarson TR; Wasif N
J Gastrointest Surg; 2014 Nov; 18(11):1929-35. PubMed ID: 24916590
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Evolution and impact of lymph node dissection during pancreaticoduodenectomy for pancreatic cancer.
Eskander MF; de Geus SW; Kasumova GG; Ng SC; Al-Refaie W; Ayata G; Tseng JF
Surgery; 2017 Apr; 161(4):968-976. PubMed ID: 27865602
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Common hepatic artery lymph node metastasis in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: an analysis of actual survival.
Kuo S; Ventin M; Sato H; Harrison JM; Okuda Y; Qadan M; Ferrone CR; Lillemoe KD; Fernandez-Del Castillo C
J Gastrointest Surg; 2024 May; 28(5):672-678. PubMed ID: 38704205
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Prognostic relevance of lymph node ratio following pancreaticoduodenectomy for pancreatic cancer.
Pawlik TM; Gleisner AL; Cameron JL; Winter JM; Assumpcao L; Lillemoe KD; Wolfgang C; Hruban RH; Schulick RD; Yeo CJ; Choti MA
Surgery; 2007 May; 141(5):610-8. PubMed ID: 17462460
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Metastatic lymph node ratio as an important prognostic factor in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma.
Robinson SM; Rahman A; Haugk B; French JJ; Manas DM; Jaques BC; Charnley RM; White SA
Eur J Surg Oncol; 2012 Apr; 38(4):333-9. PubMed ID: 22317758
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Role of the lymph node ratio in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Impact on patient stratification and prognosis.
La Torre M; Cavallini M; Ramacciato G; Cosenza G; Rossi Del Monte S; Nigri G; Ferri M; Mercantini P; Ziparo V
J Surg Oncol; 2011 Nov; 104(6):629-33. PubMed ID: 21713779
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Peripancreatic fat invasion is an independent predictor of poor outcome following pancreaticoduodenectomy for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma.
Jamieson NB; Foulis AK; Oien KA; Dickson EJ; Imrie CW; Carter R; McKay CJ
J Gastrointest Surg; 2011 Mar; 15(3):512-24. PubMed ID: 21116727
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Accuracy of staging node-negative pancreas cancer: a potential quality measure.
Tomlinson JS; Jain S; Bentrem DJ; Sekeris EG; Maggard MA; Hines OJ; Reber HA; Ko CY
Arch Surg; 2007 Aug; 142(8):767-723; discussion 773-4. PubMed ID: 17709731
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Preoperative serum C-reactive protein levels and post-operative lymph node ratio are important predictors of survival after pancreaticoduodenectomy for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma.
Sanjay P; de Figueiredo RS; Leaver H; Ogston S; Kulli C; Polignano FM; Tait IS
JOP; 2012 Mar; 13(2):199-204. PubMed ID: 22406601
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Hepatic artery lymph node relevance in periampullary tumors: A retrospective analysis of survival outcomes.
Conde D; Rey C; Pardo M; Recaman A; Sabogal Olarte JC
Front Surg; 2022; 9():963855. PubMed ID: 36561573
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Para-aortic lymph node sampling in pancreatic head adenocarcinoma.
Schwarz L; Lupinacci RM; Svrcek M; Lesurtel M; Bubenheim M; Vuarnesson H; Balladur P; Paye F
Br J Surg; 2014 Apr; 101(5):530-8. PubMed ID: 24633831
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Role of lymphatic invasion in the prognosis of patients with clinical node-negative and pathologic node-positive lung adenocarcinoma.
Mimae T; Tsutani Y; Miyata Y; Yoshiya T; Ibuki Y; Kushitani K; Takeshima Y; Nakayama H; Okumura S; Yoshimura M; Okada M
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2014 Jun; 147(6):1820-6. PubMed ID: 24507979
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
