These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

170 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31839327)

  • 1. Effect of digital scans on marginal and internal discrepancies of zirconia crowns.
    Kim SS; Jeong JH; Lee JI; Cho HW
    J Prosthet Dent; 2020 Oct; 124(4):461-467. PubMed ID: 31839327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of marginal and internal fit of 3-unit zirconia frameworks fabricated with CAD-CAM technology using direct and indirect digital scans.
    Arezoobakhsh A; Shayegh SS; Jamali Ghomi A; Hakimaneh SMR
    J Prosthet Dent; 2020 Jan; 123(1):105-112. PubMed ID: 30982618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effect of digital impressions and production protocols on the adaptation of zirconia copings.
    Kocaağaoğlu H; Kılınç HI; Albayrak H
    J Prosthet Dent; 2017 Jan; 117(1):102-108. PubMed ID: 27622786
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Marginal and Internal Fit of CAD/CAM Crowns Fabricated Over Reverse Tapered Preparations.
    Carbajal Mejía JB; Yatani H; Wakabayashi K; Nakamura T
    J Prosthodont; 2019 Feb; 28(2):e477-e484. PubMed ID: 29194841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of the Fit of Lithium Disilicate Crowns made from Conventional, Digital, or Conventional/Digital Techniques.
    Al Hamad KQ; Al Rashdan BA; Al Omari WM; Baba NZ
    J Prosthodont; 2019 Feb; 28(2):e580-e586. PubMed ID: 30091168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Evaluation of the fit of zirconia copings fabricated by direct and indirect digital scanning procedures.
    Lee B; Oh KC; Haam D; Lee JH; Moon HS
    J Prosthet Dent; 2018 Aug; 120(2):225-231. PubMed ID: 29428522
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of an indirect impression scanning system and two direct intraoral scanning systems in vivo.
    Bosniac P; Rehmann P; Wöstmann B
    Clin Oral Investig; 2019 May; 23(5):2421-2427. PubMed ID: 30298453
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of the Accuracy of Fit of Metal, Zirconia, and Lithium Disilicate Crowns Made from Different Manufacturing Techniques.
    Al Hamad KQ; Al Quran FA; AlJalam SA; Baba NZ
    J Prosthodont; 2019 Jun; 28(5):497-503. PubMed ID: 30719780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Internal and marginal discrepancies associated with stereolithography (SLA) additively manufactured zirconia crowns.
    Revilla-León M; Methani MM; Morton D; Zandinejad A
    J Prosthet Dent; 2020 Dec; 124(6):730-737. PubMed ID: 31980204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Influence of scanner, powder application, and adjustments on CAD-CAM crown misfit.
    Prudente MS; Davi LR; Nabbout KO; Prado CJ; Pereira LM; Zancopé K; Neves FD
    J Prosthet Dent; 2018 Mar; 119(3):377-383. PubMed ID: 28689912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A comparison of the marginal fit of crowns fabricated with digital and conventional methods.
    Ng J; Ruse D; Wyatt C
    J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Sep; 112(3):555-60. PubMed ID: 24630399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Evaluating the marginal fit of zirconia copings with digital impressions with an intraoral digital scanner.
    An S; Kim S; Choi H; Lee JH; Moon HS
    J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Nov; 112(5):1171-5. PubMed ID: 24951386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Marginal and internal fit of CAD-CAM-fabricated composite resin and ceramic crowns scanned by 2 intraoral cameras.
    de Paula Silveira AC; Chaves SB; Hilgert LA; Ribeiro AP
    J Prosthet Dent; 2017 Mar; 117(3):386-392. PubMed ID: 27677214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Influence of conventional and digital intraoral impressions on the fit of CAD/CAM-fabricated all-ceramic crowns.
    Berrendero S; Salido MP; Valverde A; Ferreiroa A; Pradíes G
    Clin Oral Investig; 2016 Dec; 20(9):2403-2410. PubMed ID: 26800669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Marginal fit of CAD-CAM monolithic zirconia crowns fabricated by using cone beam computed tomography scans.
    Kale E; Cilli M; Özçelik TB; Yilmaz B
    J Prosthet Dent; 2020 May; 123(5):731-737. PubMed ID: 31653403
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Marginal fit of zirconia copings fabricated after conventional impression making and digital scanning: An in vitro study.
    Carrilho Baltazar Vaz IM; Pimentel Coelho Lino Carracho JF
    J Prosthet Dent; 2020 Aug; 124(2):223.e1-223.e6. PubMed ID: 32336539
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Marginal Accuracy of Monolithic and Veneered Zirconia Crowns Fabricated by Conventional and Digital Workflows.
    Abduo J; Ho G; Centorame A; Chohan S; Park C; Abdouni R; Le P; Ngo C
    J Prosthodont; 2023 Oct; 32(8):706-713. PubMed ID: 36321644
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. An in vitro evaluation of marginal fit zirconia crowns fabricated by a CAD-CAM dental laboratory and a milling center.
    Meirowitz A; Bitterman Y; Levy S; Mijiritsky E; Dolev E
    BMC Oral Health; 2019 Jun; 19(1):103. PubMed ID: 31196041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Marginal discrepancy of monolithic and veneered all-ceramic crowns on titanium and zirconia implant abutments before and after adhesive cementation: a scanning electron microscopy analysis.
    Martinez-Rus F; Ferreiroa A; Ozcan M; Pradies G
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2013; 28(2):480-7. PubMed ID: 23527350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Fit of lithium disilicate crowns fabricated from conventional and digital impressions assessed with micro-CT.
    Kim JH; Jeong JH; Lee JH; Cho HW
    J Prosthet Dent; 2016 Oct; 116(4):551-557. PubMed ID: 27422237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.