These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

128 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31839335)

  • 1. How does participating in a deliberative citizens panel on healthcare priority setting influence the views of participants?
    Reckers-Droog V; Jansen M; Bijlmakers L; Baltussen R; Brouwer W; van Exel J
    Health Policy; 2020 Feb; 124(2):143-151. PubMed ID: 31839335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Viewpoints among experts and the public in the Netherlands on including a lifestyle criterion in the healthcare priority setting.
    Dieteren CM; Reckers-Droog VT; Schrama S; de Boer D; van Exel J
    Health Expect; 2022 Feb; 25(1):333-344. PubMed ID: 34845790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Priority to End of Life Treatments? Views of the Public in the Netherlands.
    Wouters S; van Exel J; Baker R; B F Brouwer W
    Value Health; 2017 Jan; 20(1):107-117. PubMed ID: 28212951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Addressing the affordability of cancer drugs: using deliberative public engagement to inform health policy.
    Bentley C; Peacock S; Abelson J; Burgess MM; Demers-Payette O; Longstaff H; Tripp L; Lavis JN; Wilson MG
    Health Res Policy Syst; 2019 Feb; 17(1):17. PubMed ID: 30732616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The Dutch Citizen Forum on Public Reimbursement of Healthcare: A Qualitative Analysis of Opinion Change.
    Jansen M; Baltussen R; Bijlmakers L; Tummers M
    Int J Health Policy Manag; 2022 Feb; 11(2):118-127. PubMed ID: 32610763
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Does deliberation make a difference? Results from a citizens panel study of health goals priority setting.
    Abelson J; Eyles J; McLeod CB; Collins P; McMullan C; Forest PG
    Health Policy; 2003 Oct; 66(1):95-106. PubMed ID: 14499168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Increasing the Legitimacy of Tough Choices in Healthcare Reimbursement: Approach and Results of a Citizen Forum in The Netherlands.
    Bijlmakers L; Jansen M; Boer B; van Dijk W; Groenewoud S; Zwaap J; Helderman JK; van Exel J; Baltussen R
    Value Health; 2020 Jan; 23(1):32-38. PubMed ID: 31952671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Societal views in the Netherlands on active disinvestment of publicly funded healthcare interventions.
    Rotteveel AH; Reckers-Droog VT; Lambooij MS; de Wit GA; van Exel NJA
    Soc Sci Med; 2021 Mar; 272():113708. PubMed ID: 33516087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effectiveness of public deliberation methods for gathering input on issues in healthcare: Results from a randomized trial.
    Carman KL; Mallery C; Maurer M; Wang G; Garfinkel S; Yang M; Gilmore D; Windham A; Ginsburg M; Sofaer S; Gold M; Pathak-Sen E; Davies T; Siegel J; Mangrum R; Fernandez J; Richmond J; Fishkin J; Siu Chao A
    Soc Sci Med; 2015 May; 133():11-20. PubMed ID: 25828260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Swiss-CHAT: Citizens Discuss Priorities for Swiss Health Insurance Coverage.
    Hurst SA; Schindler M; Goold SD; Danis M
    Int J Health Policy Manag; 2018 Aug; 7(8):746-754. PubMed ID: 30078295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. To what extent do citizens support the disinvestment of healthcare interventions? An exploration of the support for four viewpoints on active disinvestment in the Netherlands.
    Rotteveel AH; Lambooij MS; van Exel J; de Wit GA
    Soc Sci Med; 2022 Jan; 293():114662. PubMed ID: 34953417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Assessing the impact of deliberative processes on the views of participants: is it 'in one ear and out the other'?
    Stafinski T; Menon D; Yasui Y
    Health Expect; 2014 Apr; 17(2):278-90. PubMed ID: 22296492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Deliberative participation of citizens in the prioritisation debate: what is their contribution?].
    Stumpf S; Raspe H
    Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes; 2012; 106(6):418-25. PubMed ID: 22857729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Eliciting public preferences for healthcare: a systematic review of techniques.
    Ryan M; Scott DA; Reeves C; Bate A; van Teijlingen ER; Russell EM; Napper M; Robb CM
    Health Technol Assess; 2001; 5(5):1-186. PubMed ID: 11262422
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Which public and why deliberate?--A scoping review of public deliberation in public health and health policy research.
    Degeling C; Carter SM; Rychetnik L
    Soc Sci Med; 2015 Apr; 131():114-21. PubMed ID: 25770463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The Use of Evidence-Informed Deliberative Processes for Designing the Essential Package of Health Services in Pakistan.
    Baltussen R; Jansen M; Akhtar SS; Bijlmakers L; Torres-Rueda S; Khalid M; Raza W; Huda M; Surgey G; Zulfiqar W; Vassall A; Zaidi R; Siddiqi S; Alwan A
    Int J Health Policy Manag; 2024; 13():8004. PubMed ID: 39099516
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Public perspectives on disinvestments in drug funding: results from a Canadian deliberative public engagement event on cancer drugs.
    Costa S; Bentley C; Regier DA; McTaggart-Cowan H; Mitton C; Burgess MM; Peacock SJ
    BMC Public Health; 2019 Jul; 19(1):977. PubMed ID: 31331312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Blueprint for a deliberative public forum on biobanking policy: were theoretical principles achievable in practice?
    Molster C; Maxwell S; Youngs L; Kyne G; Hope F; Dawkins H; O'Leary P
    Health Expect; 2013 Jun; 16(2):211-24. PubMed ID: 21645188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Who should receive treatment? An empirical enquiry into the relationship between societal views and preferences concerning healthcare priority setting.
    Reckers-Droog V; van Exel J; Brouwer W
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(6):e0198761. PubMed ID: 29949648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Staff members' prioritisation of care in residential aged care facilities: a Q methodology study.
    Ludlow K; Churruca K; Mumford V; Ellis LA; Braithwaite J
    BMC Health Serv Res; 2020 May; 20(1):423. PubMed ID: 32410685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.