These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

266 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31839398)

  • 21. Cortical Excitability through Anodal Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation: a Computational Approach.
    Arora Y; Chowdhury SR
    J Med Syst; 2020 Jan; 44(2):48. PubMed ID: 31900599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Electric field envelope focality in superficial brain areas with linear alignment montage in temporal interference stimulation.
    Hirata A; Akazawa Y; Kodera S; Otsuru N; Laakso I
    Comput Biol Med; 2024 Aug; 178():108697. PubMed ID: 38850958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Group-level analysis of induced electric field in deep brain regions by different TMS coils.
    Gomez-Tames J; Hamasaka A; Hirata A; Laakso I; Lu M; Ueno S
    Phys Med Biol; 2020 Jan; 65(2):025007. PubMed ID: 31796653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Assessment of electric field distribution in anisotropic cortical and subcortical regions under the influence of tDCS.
    Shahid S; Wen P; Ahfock T
    Bioelectromagnetics; 2014 Jan; 35(1):41-57. PubMed ID: 24122951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. How does the electric field induced by tDCS influence motor-related connectivity? Model-guided perspectives.
    Fernandes SR; Callejón-Leblic MA; Ferreira HA
    Phys Med Biol; 2024 Feb; 69(5):. PubMed ID: 38266295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. A Computational Analysis of the Electric Field Components in Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation.
    Callejon-Leblic MA; Miranda PC
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2019 Jul; 2019():5913-5917. PubMed ID: 31947195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Effects of transcranial direct current stimulation for treating depression: A modeling study.
    Csifcsák G; Boayue NM; Puonti O; Thielscher A; Mittner M
    J Affect Disord; 2018 Jul; 234():164-173. PubMed ID: 29529550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. The impact of large structural brain changes in chronic stroke patients on the electric field caused by transcranial brain stimulation.
    Minjoli S; Saturnino GB; Blicher JU; Stagg CJ; Siebner HR; Antunes A; Thielscher A
    Neuroimage Clin; 2017; 15():106-117. PubMed ID: 28516033
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Electrode montage-dependent intracranial variability in electric fields induced by cerebellar transcranial direct current stimulation.
    Klaus J; Schutter DJLG
    Sci Rep; 2021 Nov; 11(1):22183. PubMed ID: 34773062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Clinical Pilot Study and Computational Modeling of Bitemporal Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation, and Safety of Repeated Courses of Treatment, in Major Depression.
    Ho KA; Bai S; Martin D; Alonzo A; Dokos S; Loo CK
    J ECT; 2015 Dec; 31(4):226-33. PubMed ID: 25807341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Effect of electrode-electrolyte spatial mismatch on transcranial direct current stimulation: a finite element modeling study.
    Chen L; Zou X; Tang R; Ke A; He J
    J Neural Eng; 2019 Aug; 16(5):056012. PubMed ID: 31195379
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Interindividual differences in posterior fossa morphometry affect cerebellar tDCS-induced electric field strength.
    Maas RPPWM; Faber J; ; van de Warrenburg BPC; Schutter DJLG
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2023 Sep; 153():152-165. PubMed ID: 37499446
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. The value and cost of complexity in predictive modelling: role of tissue anisotropic conductivity and fibre tracts in neuromodulation.
    Shahid SS; Bikson M; Salman H; Wen P; Ahfock T
    J Neural Eng; 2014 Jun; 11(3):036002. PubMed ID: 24737098
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Transcranial direct current stimulation in patients after decompressive craniectomy: a finite element model to investigate factors affecting the cortical electric field.
    Sun W; Dong X; Yu G; Shuai L; Yuan Y; Ma C
    J Int Med Res; 2021 Feb; 49(2):300060520942112. PubMed ID: 33788619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Effect of Aging on Cortical Current Flow Due to Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation: Considerations for Safety.
    Thomas C; Datta A; Woods A
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2018 Jul; 2018():3084-3087. PubMed ID: 30441046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Influence of gender-related differences in transcranial direct current stimulation: A Computational Study
    Thomas C; Ghodratitoostani I; Delbem ACB; Ali A; Datta A
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2019 Jul; 2019():5196-5199. PubMed ID: 31947029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. A computational modelling study of transcranial direct current stimulation montages used in depression.
    Bai S; Dokos S; Ho KA; Loo C
    Neuroimage; 2014 Feb; 87():332-44. PubMed ID: 24246487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Optimized APPS-tDCS electrode position, size, and distance doubles the on-target stimulation magnitude in 3000 electric field models.
    Caulfield KA; George MS
    Sci Rep; 2022 Nov; 12(1):20116. PubMed ID: 36418438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Variation of cerebrospinal fluid in specific regions regulates focality in transcranial direct current stimulation.
    Kashyap R; Bhattacharjee S; Bharath RD; Venkatasubramanian G; Udupa K; Bashir S; Oishi K; Desmond JE; Chen SHA; Guan C
    Front Hum Neurosci; 2022; 16():952602. PubMed ID: 36118967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.