These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

478 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31840811)

  • 1. Success rates and outcomes of laparoscopic mesh sacrohysteropexy.
    Daniels S; Robson D; Palacz M; Howell S; Nguyen T; Behnia-Willison F
    Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 2020 Apr; 60(2):244-249. PubMed ID: 31840811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Laparoscopic sacrohysteropexy versus vaginal hysterectomy and apical suspension: 7-year follow-up of a randomized controlled trial.
    Izett-Kay ML; Rahmanou P; Cartwright RJ; Price N; Jackson SR
    Int Urogynecol J; 2022 Jul; 33(7):1957-1965. PubMed ID: 34424347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Hysteropexy in the treatment of uterine prolapse stage 2 or higher: a multicenter randomized controlled non-inferiority trial comparing laparoscopic sacrohysteropexy with vaginal sacrospinous hysteropexy (LAVA-trial, study protocol).
    van IJsselmuiden MN; Coolen AL; Detollenaere RJ; den Boon J; Bongers M; van de Pol G; Vollebregt A; Radder CM; Deprest J; van Eijndhoven HW
    BMC Womens Health; 2014 Sep; 14():112. PubMed ID: 25231240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Uterine preservation vs hysterectomy in pelvic organ prolapse surgery: a systematic review with meta-analysis and clinical practice guidelines.
    Meriwether KV; Antosh DD; Olivera CK; Kim-Fine S; Balk EM; Murphy M; Grimes CL; Sleemi A; Singh R; Dieter AA; Crisp CC; Rahn DD
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2018 Aug; 219(2):129-146.e2. PubMed ID: 29353031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Vaginal and laparoscopic mesh hysteropexy for uterovaginal prolapse: a parallel cohort study.
    Gutman RE; Rardin CR; Sokol ER; Matthews C; Park AJ; Iglesia CB; Geoffrion R; Sokol AI; Karram M; Cundiff GW; Blomquist JL; Barber MD
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2017 Jan; 216(1):38.e1-38.e11. PubMed ID: 27596620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A randomized, prospective, controlled study comparing uterine preserving laparoscopic lateral suspension with mesh versus laparoscopic sacrohysteropexy in the treatment of uterine prolapse.
    Doğan O; Yassa M; Eren E; Birol İlter P; Tuğ N
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2024 Jun; 297():120-125. PubMed ID: 38608354
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Laparoscopic Uterosacral Suture Sacrohysteropexy: LUSSH Procedure.
    Jan H; Ghai V
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2019 Feb; 26(2):356-357. PubMed ID: 29631010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Guideline No. 413: Surgical Management of Apical Pelvic Organ Prolapse in Women.
    Geoffrion R; Larouche M
    J Obstet Gynaecol Can; 2021 Apr; 43(4):511-523.e1. PubMed ID: 33548503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Uterine-preserving surgeries for the repair of pelvic organ prolapse: a systematic review with meta-analysis and clinical practice guidelines.
    Meriwether KV; Balk EM; Antosh DD; Olivera CK; Kim-Fine S; Murphy M; Grimes CL; Sleemi A; Singh R; Dieter AA; Crisp CC; Rahn DD
    Int Urogynecol J; 2019 Apr; 30(4):505-522. PubMed ID: 30741318
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Uterine preservation for advanced pelvic organ prolapse repair: Anatomical results and patient satisfaction.
    Fink K; Shachar IB; Braun NM
    Int Braz J Urol; 2016; 42(4):773-8. PubMed ID: 27564289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Efficacy and pregnancy outcomes of laparoscopic single sheet mesh sacrohysteropexy.
    Pandeva I; Mistry M; Fayyad A
    Neurourol Urodyn; 2017 Mar; 36(3):787-793. PubMed ID: 27224927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Laparoscopic Uterosacral Ligament Hysteropexy vs Total Vaginal Hysterectomy with Uterosacral Ligament Suspension for Anterior and Apical Prolapse: Surgical Outcome and Patient Satisfaction.
    Haj-Yahya R; Chill HH; Levin G; Reuveni-Salzman A; Shveiky D
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2020 Jan; 27(1):88-93. PubMed ID: 30802607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Anatomical outcomes 1 year after pelvic organ prolapse surgery in patients with and without a uterus at a high risk of recurrence: a randomised controlled trial comparing laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy/cervicopexy and anterior vaginal mesh.
    Bataller E; Ros C; Anglès S; Gallego M; Espuña-Pons M; Carmona F
    Int Urogynecol J; 2019 Apr; 30(4):545-555. PubMed ID: 29987345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Laparoscopic repair of vaginal vault prolapse by lateral suspension with mesh.
    Dubuisson J; Eperon I; Dällenbach P; Dubuisson JB
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2013 Feb; 287(2):307-12. PubMed ID: 23001368
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effect of Vaginal Mesh Hysteropexy vs Vaginal Hysterectomy With Uterosacral Ligament Suspension on Treatment Failure in Women With Uterovaginal Prolapse: A Randomized Clinical Trial.
    Nager CW; Visco AG; Richter HE; Rardin CR; Rogers RG; Harvie HS; Zyczynski HM; Paraiso MFR; Mazloomdoost D; Grey S; Sridhar A; Wallace D;
    JAMA; 2019 Sep; 322(11):1054-1065. PubMed ID: 31529008
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Evaluation of two vaginal, uterus sparing operations for pelvic organ prolapse: modified Manchester operation (MM) and sacrospinous hysteropexy (SSH), a study protocol for a multicentre randomized non-inferiority trial (the SAM study).
    Schulten SFM; Enklaar RA; Kluivers KB; van Leijsen SAL; Jansen-van der Weide MC; Adang EMM; van Bavel J; van Dongen H; Gerritse MBE; van Gestel I; Malmberg GGA; Mouw RJC; van Rumpt-van de Geest DA; Spaans WA; van der Steen A; Stekelenburg J; Tiersma ESM; Verkleij-Hagoort AC; Vollebregt A; Wingen CBM; Weemhoff M; van Eijndhoven HWF
    BMC Womens Health; 2019 Apr; 19(1):49. PubMed ID: 30940171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A Meshless Practical Laparoscopic Sacrohysteropexy Modification and Long-term Outcomes.
    Orhan A; Ozerkan K; Kasapoglu I; Ocakoglu G; Aslan K; Uncu G
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2020; 27(7):1573-1580. PubMed ID: 32135244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Hysteropexy in the treatment of uterine prolapse stage 2 or higher: laparoscopic sacrohysteropexy versus sacrospinous hysteropexy-a multicentre randomised controlled trial (LAVA trial).
    van IJsselmuiden MN; van Oudheusden A; Veen J; van de Pol G; Vollebregt A; Radder CM; Housmans S; van Kuijk S; Deprest J; Bongers MY; van Eijndhoven H
    BJOG; 2020 Sep; 127(10):1284-1293. PubMed ID: 32267624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Laparoscopic and robot-assisted suture versus mesh hysteropexy: a retrospective comparison.
    Gopinath D; Yong C; Harding-Forrester S; McIntyre F; McKenzie D; Carey M
    Int Urogynecol J; 2023 Jan; 34(1):105-113. PubMed ID: 35881174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Study on mesh-augmented vaginal reconstructive surgery in treatment of pelvic organ prolapse].
    Han JS; Zhang K; Zhu FL; Yao Y; Liang HM; Zhou LF; Guo HY
    Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2011 Feb; 46(2):101-4. PubMed ID: 21426766
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 24.