BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

127 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31841062)

  • 21. Comparison of the 7th and 8th editions of the American Joint Committee on Cancer Staging Systems for perihilar cholangiocarcinoma.
    Ruzzenente A; Bagante F; Ardito F; Campagnaro T; Scoleri I; Conci S; Iacono C; Giuliante F; Guglielmi A
    Surgery; 2018 Aug; 164(2):244-250. PubMed ID: 29801730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. The effectiveness of the 8th American Joint Committee on Cancer TNM classification in the prognosis evaluation of gastric cancer patients: A comparative study between the 7th and 8th editions.
    Lu J; Zheng CH; Cao LL; Li P; Xie JW; Wang JB; Lin JX; Chen QY; Lin M; Huang CM
    Eur J Surg Oncol; 2017 Dec; 43(12):2349-2356. PubMed ID: 28943179
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Comparison of the 6th and 7th editions of the AJCC/UICC TNM staging system for gastric cancer focusing on the "N" parameter-related survival: the monoinstitutional NodUs Italian study.
    Marano L; Boccardi V; Braccio B; Esposito G; Grassia M; Petrillo M; Pezzella M; Porfidia R; Reda G; Romano A; Schettino M; Cosenza A; Izzo G; Di Martino N
    World J Surg Oncol; 2015 Jul; 13():215. PubMed ID: 26179492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Equipping the 8th Edition American Joint Committee on Cancer Staging for Gastric Cancer with the 15-Node Minimum: a Population-Based Study Using Recursive Partitioning Analysis.
    Yuan SQ; Chen YT; Huang ZP
    J Gastrointest Surg; 2017 Oct; 21(10):1591-1598. PubMed ID: 28752402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. [The Comparison between 6th and 7th International Union Against Cancer/American Joint Committee on Cancer Classification for Survival Prognosis of Gastric Cancer].
    Kim SS; Choi BY; Seo SI; Jung MY; Choi HS; Ahn SM; Choi WH; Kim HS; Kim KH; Jang MK; Lee JH; Kim HY; Shin WG
    Korean J Gastroenterol; 2011 Nov; 58(5):258-63. PubMed ID: 22113042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. [Evaluation of the value of 7th editions of UICC-AJCC esophageal and gastric cancer TNM staging systems for prognostic prediction of adenocarcinoma of esophagogastric junction (Siewert type II)].
    Shi GD; Luo ZL; Fu MY; Tian D; Zhang L; Zhang KP
    Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi; 2014 Dec; 36(12):916-21. PubMed ID: 25623766
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Comparison of 7th and 8th editions of the UICC/AJCC TNM staging for non-small cell lung cancer in a non-metastatic North American cohort undergoing primary radiation treatment.
    Koul R; Rathod S; Dubey A; Bashir B; Chowdhury A
    Lung Cancer; 2018 Sep; 123():116-120. PubMed ID: 30089581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Which staging system better predicts 10-year survival for gastric cancer? A study using an international multicenter database.
    Lin JX; Lin JP; Li P; Xie JW; Wang JB; Lu J; Chen QY; Cao LL; Lin M; Tu RH; Huang ZN; Lin JL; Zheng CH; Huang CM
    Eur J Surg Oncol; 2018 Aug; 44(8):1205-1211. PubMed ID: 29804693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Anatomical location-based nodal staging system is superior to the 7th edition of the American Joint Committee on Cancer staging system among patients with surgically resected, histologically low-grade gastric cancer: A single institutional experience.
    Chen MW; Chan CP; Lin YJ; Yen HH
    PLoS One; 2019; 14(2):e0211836. PubMed ID: 30721261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Comparison of 6th and 7th AJCC TNM staging classification for carcinoma of the stomach in China.
    Qiu MZ; Wang ZQ; Zhang DS; Liu Q; Luo HY; Zhou ZW; Li YH; Jiang WQ; Xu RH
    Ann Surg Oncol; 2011 Jul; 18(7):1869-76. PubMed ID: 21246404
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. [Comparison of the predictive value of the sixth and seventh edition TNM pT classifications in prognosis for gastric cancer].
    Zhang P; Xu Y; Guo J; Xu H
    Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi; 2015 Mar; 37(3):190-4. PubMed ID: 25975787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. A better prognostic stratification for the 8th edition of the AJCC staging system of gastric cancer by incorporating pT4aN0M0 into stage IIIA.
    Chen Y; Zhang G; Zhao B; Huang C; Ling Y; Li Y; Zhou Z
    Surg Oncol; 2019 Jun; 29():90-96. PubMed ID: 31196500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. [Development trend of assessment system in gastric cancer based on evolution of staging criteria].
    Sun L
    Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2018 Oct; 21(10):1113-1120. PubMed ID: 30370509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Evaluation of the New American Joint Committee on Cancer Staging Manual 8th Edition for Perihilar Cholangiocarcinoma.
    Gaspersz MP; Buettner S; van Vugt JLA; de Jonge J; Polak WG; Doukas M; Ijzermans JNM; Koerkamp BG; Willemssen FEJA
    J Gastrointest Surg; 2020 Jul; 24(7):1612-1618. PubMed ID: 30756314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Assessment of the external validity of the American Joint Committee on Cancer 8th staging system for anal carcinoma.
    Oweira H; Giryes A; Mannhart M; Decker M; Schlumpf R; Abdel-Rahman O
    Curr Med Res Opin; 2018 May; 34(5):923-929. PubMed ID: 29448859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Comparison of the 7th and proposed 8th editions of the AJCC/UICC TNM staging system for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma underwent radical surgery.
    Zhang D; Zheng Y; Wang Z; Huang Q; Cao X; Wang F; Liu S
    Eur J Surg Oncol; 2017 Oct; 43(10):1949-1955. PubMed ID: 28716377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Multi-institutional validation of the 8th AJCC TNM staging system for gastric cancer: Analysis of survival data from high-volume Eastern centers and the SEER database.
    Son T; Sun J; Choi S; Cho M; Kwon IG; Kim HI; Cheong JH; Choi SH; Noh SH; Woo Y; Fong Y; Park S; Hyung WJ
    J Surg Oncol; 2019 Sep; 120(4):676-684. PubMed ID: 31338834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Validation of the 8th edition of AJCC/UICC staging system for nasopharyngeal carcinoma: Results from a non-endemic cohort with 10-year follow-up.
    Wu LR; Zhang XM; Xie XD; Lu Y; Wu JF; He X
    Oral Oncol; 2019 Nov; 98():141-146. PubMed ID: 31586896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. The IGCA staging system is more accurate than AJCC7 system in stratifying survival of patients with gastric cancer in stage III.
    Shu P; Qin J; Shen K; Chen W; Liu F; Fang Y; Wang X; Wang H; Shen Z; Sun Y; Qin X
    BMC Cancer; 2017 Mar; 17(1):238. PubMed ID: 28359303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. AJCC 7th edition staging classification is more applicable than AJCC 8th edition staging classification for invasive IPMN.
    Fan Z; Cheng H; Jin K; Gong Y; Huang Q; Xu J; Ni Q; Yu X; Liu C; Luo G
    World J Surg Oncol; 2019 Aug; 17(1):137. PubMed ID: 31387646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.