These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
145 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31841564)
1. GLAMbox: A Python toolbox for investigating the association between gaze allocation and decision behaviour. Molter F; Thomas AW; Heekeren HR; Mohr PNC PLoS One; 2019; 14(12):e0226428. PubMed ID: 31841564 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Gaze behaviour during space perception and spatial decision making. Wiener JM; Hölscher C; Büchner S; Konieczny L Psychol Res; 2012 Nov; 76(6):713-29. PubMed ID: 22139023 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Gaze Amplifies Value in Decision Making. Smith SM; Krajbich I Psychol Sci; 2019 Jan; 30(1):116-128. PubMed ID: 30526339 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Uncertainty in learning, choice, and visual fixation. Stojić H; Orquin JL; Dayan P; Dolan RJ; Speekenbrink M Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2020 Feb; 117(6):3291-3300. PubMed ID: 31980535 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The timing of gaze-contingent decision prompts influences risky choice. Sui XY; Liu HZ; Rao LL Cognition; 2020 Feb; 195():104077. PubMed ID: 31770670 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The simplest complete model of choice response time: linear ballistic accumulation. Brown SD; Heathcote A Cogn Psychol; 2008 Nov; 57(3):153-78. PubMed ID: 18243170 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. In situ examination of decision-making skills and gaze behaviour of basketball players. van Maarseveen MJJ; Savelsbergh GJP; Oudejans RRD Hum Mov Sci; 2018 Feb; 57():205-216. PubMed ID: 29253742 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Multi-attribute, multi-alternative models of choice: Choice, reaction time, and process tracing. Cohen AL; Kang N; Leise TL Cogn Psychol; 2017 Nov; 98():45-72. PubMed ID: 28843070 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Intentional gaze shift to neglected space: a compensatory strategy during recovery after unilateral spatial neglect. Takamura Y; Imanishi M; Osaka M; Ohmatsu S; Tominaga T; Yamanaka K; Morioka S; Kawashima N Brain; 2016 Nov; 139(11):2970-2982. PubMed ID: 27663624 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Visual fixations and the computation and comparison of value in simple choice. Krajbich I; Armel C; Rangel A Nat Neurosci; 2010 Oct; 13(10):1292-8. PubMed ID: 20835253 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Early interactions between orienting, visual sampling and decision making in facial preference. Simion C; Shimojo S Vision Res; 2006 Oct; 46(20):3331-5. PubMed ID: 16765404 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Biasing moral decisions by exploiting the dynamics of eye gaze. Pärnamets P; Johansson P; Hall L; Balkenius C; Spivey MJ; Richardson DC Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2015 Mar; 112(13):4170-5. PubMed ID: 25775604 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Motor response vigour and visual fixation patterns reflect subjective valuation during intertemporal choice. Smith E; Peters J PLoS Comput Biol; 2022 Jun; 18(6):e1010096. PubMed ID: 35687550 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Win-Concurrent Sensory Cues Can Promote Riskier Choice. Cherkasova MV; Clark L; Barton JJS; Schulzer M; Shafiee M; Kingstone A; Stoessl AJ; Winstanley CA J Neurosci; 2018 Nov; 38(48):10362-10370. PubMed ID: 30373765 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Hard Decisions Shape the Neural Coding of Preferences. Voigt K; Murawski C; Speer S; Bode S J Neurosci; 2019 Jan; 39(4):718-726. PubMed ID: 30530856 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Extending a biologically inspired model of choice: multi-alternatives, nonlinearity and value-based multidimensional choice. Bogacz R; Usher M; Zhang J; McClelland JL Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci; 2007 Sep; 362(1485):1655-70. PubMed ID: 17428774 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]