182 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31842016)
21. Comparing dental identifier charting in cone beam computed tomography scans and panoramic radiographs using INTERPOL coding for human identification.
Franco A; Orestes SGF; Coimbra EF; Thevissen P; Fernandes Â
Forensic Sci Int; 2019 Sep; 302():109860. PubMed ID: 31310942
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Radiographic findings of bisphosphonate-related osteonecrosis of the jaws: Comparison with cone-beam computed tomography and panoramic radiography.
Demir A; Pekiner FN
Niger J Clin Pract; 2017 Mar; 20(3):346-354. PubMed ID: 28256491
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Prevalence of palatine tonsilloliths: a retrospective study on 150 consecutive CT examinations.
Fauroux MA; Mas C; Tramini P; Torres JH
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2013; 42(7):20120429. PubMed ID: 23628744
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Panoramic radiographic demonstration of bilateral tonsilloliths.
Guevara C; Mandel L
N Y State Dent J; 2011 Apr; 77(3):28-30. PubMed ID: 21735868
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Transoral sonographic diagnosis of tonsilloliths: report of 3 cases.
Cho W; Park H
J Ultrasound Med; 2013 Nov; 32(11):2037-42. PubMed ID: 24154909
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Ability of Cone-beam Computed Tomography to Detect Periapical Lesions That Were Not Detected by Periapical Radiography: A Retrospective Assessment According to Tooth Group.
Uraba S; Ebihara A; Komatsu K; Ohbayashi N; Okiji T
J Endod; 2016 Aug; 42(8):1186-90. PubMed ID: 27372162
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Comparative diagnosis of the alveolar antral artery canal in the lateral maxillary sinus wall in corresponding panoramic radiography and cone-beam computed tomography.
Ketabi AR; Hassfeld S; Lauer HC; Piwowarczyk A
Int J Implant Dent; 2023 Sep; 9(1):30. PubMed ID: 37725181
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. A comparison of the use of cone-beam computed tomography and panoramic radiography in the assessment of pre-eruptive intracoronal resorption.
Demirtas O; Dane A; Yildirim E
Acta Odontol Scand; 2016 Nov; 74(8):636-641. PubMed ID: 27669814
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Calcification of the stylohyoid ligament in panoramic radiography and cone beam computed tomography among patients referred for dental implant treatment planning.
Mahdian M; Moghaddam EJ; Alzahrani A; Rengasamy K; Tadinada A
Implant Dent; 2014 Aug; 23(4):508-13. PubMed ID: 25033348
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Is Panoramic Imaging Equivalent to Cone-Beam Computed Tomography for Classifying Impacted Lower Third Molars?
Brasil DM; Nascimento EHL; Gaêta-Araujo H; Oliveira-Santos C; Maria de Almeida S
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2019 Oct; 77(10):1968-1974. PubMed ID: 31075253
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Current trends in the adoption and education of cone beam computed tomography and panoramic radiography machines across Australia.
Lam M; Critchley S; Zhang A; Monsour P
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2021 Jul; 50(5):20200380. PubMed ID: 33449832
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Pseudo bilateral tonsilloliths: a case report and review of the literature.
Ram S; Siar CH; Ismail SM; Prepageran N
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2004 Jul; 98(1):110-4. PubMed ID: 15243480
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. The Reliability of Panoramic Radiography Versus Cone Beam Computed Tomography when Evaluating the Distance to the Alveolar Nerve in the Site of Lateral Teeth.
Česaitienė G; Česaitis K; Junevičius J; Venskutonis T
Med Sci Monit; 2017 Jul; 23():3247-3252. PubMed ID: 28674379
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Multidetector computed tomography imaging characteristics of asymptomatic palatine tonsilloliths: a retrospective study on 3886 examinations.
Kim MJ; Kim JE; Huh KH; Yi WJ; Heo MS; Lee SS; Choi SC
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol; 2018 Jun; 125(6):693-698. PubMed ID: 29506917
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Comparative adoption of cone beam computed tomography and panoramic radiography machines across Australia.
Zhang A; Critchley S; Monsour PA
Aust Dent J; 2016 Dec; 61(4):489-496. PubMed ID: 26881416
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Assessment of the visibility and characteristics of the mandibular incisive canal: cone beam computed tomography versus panoramic radiography.
Sahman H; Sekerci AE; Sisman Y; Payveren M
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2014; 29(1):71-8. PubMed ID: 24451856
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Do CBCT scans alter surgical treatment plans? Comparison of preoperative surgical diagnosis using panoramic versus cone-beam CT images.
Wolff C; Mücke T; Wagenpfeil S; Kanatas A; Bissinger O; Deppe H
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2016 Oct; 44(10):1700-1705. PubMed ID: 27567358
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Identification of Specific Panoramic High-Risk Signs in Impacted Third Molar Cases in Which Cone Beam Computed Tomography Changes the Treatment Decision.
Szalma J; Vajta L; Lovász BV; Kiss C; Soós B; Lempel E
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2020 Jul; 78(7):1061-1070. PubMed ID: 32304662
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. [Calcifications in the maxillofacial area].
Németh Bertalan ; Pataky L; Arpád JF; Koppany F; Barabás J
Fogorv Sz; 2015 Sep; 108(3):81-6. PubMed ID: 26731963
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Changes in tonsillolith characteristics detected in a follow-up CT study.
Yamashita K; Oda M; Tanaka T; Nishida I; Wakasugi-Sato N; Matsumoto-Takeda S; Habu M; Sago T; Takahashi O; Tsurushima H; Tabe S; Otani T; Yoshiga D; Sasaguri M; Joujima T; Miyamura Y; Morimoto Y
BMC Oral Health; 2021 Feb; 21(1):72. PubMed ID: 33593358
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
