BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

370 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31842255)

  • 1. The Accuracy of Digital Face Scans Obtained from 3D Scanners: An In Vitro Study.
    Amornvit P; Sanohkan S
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2019 Dec; 16(24):. PubMed ID: 31842255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effect of Ambient Lights on the Accuracy of a 3-Dimensional Optical Scanner for Face Scans: An In Vitro Study.
    Thongma-Eng P; Amornvit P; Silthampitag P; Rokaya D; Pisitanusorn A
    J Healthc Eng; 2022; 2022():2637078. PubMed ID: 36032545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Studying the Optical 3D Accuracy of Intraoral Scans: An In Vitro Study.
    Amornvit P; Sanohkan S; Peampring C
    J Healthc Eng; 2020; 2020():5739312. PubMed ID: 32148745
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of Accuracy of Current Ten Intraoral Scanners.
    Amornvit P; Rokaya D; Sanohkan S
    Biomed Res Int; 2021; 2021():2673040. PubMed ID: 34552983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Chairside virtual patient protocol. Part 1: Free vs Guided face scan protocol.
    Raffone C; Gianfreda F; Bollero P; Pompeo MG; Miele G; Canullo L
    J Dent; 2022 Jan; 116():103881. PubMed ID: 34762986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Trueness of One Stationary and Two Mobile Systems for Three-Dimensional Facial Scanning.
    Wang C; Shi YF; Xiong Q; Xie PJ; Wu JH; Liu WC
    Int J Prosthodont; 2022; 35(3):350-356. PubMed ID: 35727265
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Accuracy of 3-dimensional stereophotogrammetry: Comparison of the 3dMD and Bellus3D facial scanning systems with one another and with direct anthropometry.
    Liu J; Zhang C; Cai R; Yao Y; Zhao Z; Liao W
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2021 Dec; 160(6):862-871. PubMed ID: 34814981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Validation of three-dimensional facial imaging captured with smartphone-based photogrammetry application in comparison to stereophotogrammetry system.
    Andrews J; Alwafi A; Bichu YM; Pliska BT; Mostafa N; Zou B
    Heliyon; 2023 May; 9(5):e15834. PubMed ID: 37180897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Accuracy (trueness and precision) of four tablet-based applications for three-dimensional facial scanning: An in-vitro study.
    Kühlman DC; Almuzian M; Coppini C; Alzoubi EE
    J Dent; 2023 Aug; 135():104533. PubMed ID: 37149254
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effect of scan pattern on complete-arch scans with 4 digital scanners.
    Latham J; Ludlow M; Mennito A; Kelly A; Evans Z; Renne W
    J Prosthet Dent; 2020 Jan; 123(1):85-95. PubMed ID: 30982616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Chairside virtual patient protocol. Part 2: Management of multiple face scans and alignment predictability.
    Raffone C; Gianfreda F; Pompeo MG; Antonacci D; Bollero P; Canullo L
    J Dent; 2022 Jul; 122():104123. PubMed ID: 35413410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Accuracy, Repeatability, and Reproducibility of a Hand-Held Structured-Light 3D Scanner across Multi-Site Settings in Lower Limb Prosthetics.
    Cutti AG; Santi MG; Hansen AH; Fatone S;
    Sensors (Basel); 2024 Apr; 24(7):. PubMed ID: 38610559
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. An in vitro Comparison of Accuracy Between Three Different Face Scanning Modalities.
    Michelinakis G; Apostolakis D; Velidakis E
    Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 2023 Aug; 31(3):296-307. PubMed ID: 36927828
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Accuracy of open-source software segmentation and paper-based printed three-dimensional models.
    Szymor P; Kozakiewicz M; Olszewski R
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2016 Feb; 44(2):202-9. PubMed ID: 26748414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Influence of Intra-Oral Scanner (I.O.S.) on The Marginal Accuracy of CAD/CAM Single Crowns.
    Ferrini F; Sannino G; Chiola C; Capparé P; Gastaldi G; Gherlone EF
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2019 Feb; 16(4):. PubMed ID: 30769768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Bias Evaluation of the Accuracy of Two Extraoral Scanners and an Intraoral Scanner Based on ADA Standards.
    Cui N; Wang J; Hou X; Sun S; Huang Q; Lim HK; Cai H; Jia Q; Lee ES; Jiang HB
    Scanning; 2021; 2021():5535403. PubMed ID: 34221213
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Trueness of 4 three-dimensional facial scanners: an
    Zhao RF; Wang X; Ma D; Fang MJ; Bai SZ
    Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2022 Oct; 57(10):1036-1042. PubMed ID: 36266077
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Suitability and accuracy of CBCT model scan: an in vitro study.
    Robben J; Muallah J; Wesemann C; Nowak R; Mah J; Pospiech P; Bumann A
    Int J Comput Dent; 2017; 20(4):363-375. PubMed ID: 29292411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Accuracy of RGB-D camera-based and stereophotogrammetric facial scanners: a comparative study.
    Pan F; Liu J; Cen Y; Chen Y; Cai R; Zhao Z; Liao W; Wang J
    J Dent; 2022 Dec; 127():104302. PubMed ID: 36152954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Accuracy of 3D Printed Models Created by Two Technologies of Printers with Different Designs of Model Base.
    Rungrojwittayakul O; Kan JY; Shiozaki K; Swamidass RS; Goodacre BJ; Goodacre CJ; Lozada JL
    J Prosthodont; 2020 Feb; 29(2):124-128. PubMed ID: 31498957
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 19.