These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

146 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31842534)

  • 21. Mild-Gain Hearing Aids as a Treatment for Adults with Self-Reported Hearing Difficulties.
    Roup CM; Post E; Lewis J
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2018 Jun; 29(6):477-494. PubMed ID: 29863462
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Perception of temporally processed speech by listeners with hearing impairment.
    Calandruccio L; Doherty KA; Carney LH; Kikkeri HN
    Ear Hear; 2007 Aug; 28(4):512-23. PubMed ID: 17609613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Evaluation of Adaptive Noise Management Technologies for School-Age Children with Hearing Loss.
    Wolfe J; Duke M; Schafer E; Jones C; Rakita L
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2017 May; 28(5):415-435. PubMed ID: 28534732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Comparison of personal sound amplification products and conventional hearing aids for patients with hearing loss: A systematic review with meta-analysis.
    Chen CH; Huang CY; Cheng HL; Lin HH; Chu YC; Chang CY; Lai YH; Wang MC; Cheng YF
    EClinicalMedicine; 2022 Apr; 46():101378. PubMed ID: 35434580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Horizontal localization and speech intelligibility with bilateral and unilateral hearing aid amplification.
    Köbler S; Rosenhall U
    Int J Audiol; 2002 Oct; 41(7):395-400. PubMed ID: 12403607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Speech intelligibility of implanted children.
    Robbins AM; Kirk KI; Osberger MJ; Ertmer D
    Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl; 1995 Sep; 166():399-401. PubMed ID: 7668721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Understanding excessive SNR loss in hearing-impaired listeners.
    Grant KW; Walden TC
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2013 Apr; 24(4):258-73; quiz 337-8. PubMed ID: 23636208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Hearing and Speech Perception for People With Hearing Loss Using Personal Sound Amplification Products.
    Kim GY; Kim S; Jo M; Seol HY; Cho YS; Lim J; Moon IJ
    J Korean Med Sci; 2022 Mar; 37(12):e94. PubMed ID: 35347902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Effect of a Bluetooth-implemented hearing aid on speech recognition performance: subjective and objective measurement.
    Kim MB; Chung WH; Choi J; Hong SH; Cho YS; Park G; Lee S
    Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol; 2014 Jun; 123(6):395-401. PubMed ID: 24687593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Evaluation of a dual-channel full dynamic range compression system for people with sensorineural hearing loss.
    Moore BC; Johnson JS; Clark TM; Pluvinage V
    Ear Hear; 1992 Oct; 13(5):349-70. PubMed ID: 1487095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Benefits of Compression Amplification in Telephone Bluetooth-Assistive Listening Devices for People with Hearing Loss.
    Luo CH; Chang HY; Lo TS; Tai CC
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2019 Mar; 30(3):187-197. PubMed ID: 30461395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Patient selection for incus body coupling of a totally implantable middle ear implant.
    Zenner HP; Baumann JW; Reischl G; Plinkert P; Zimmermann R; Mauz PS; Limberger A; Maassen MM
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2003 Aug; 123(6):683-96. PubMed ID: 12953766
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Audiovisual asynchrony detection and speech intelligibility in noise with moderate to severe sensorineural hearing impairment.
    Başkent D; Bazo D
    Ear Hear; 2011; 32(5):582-92. PubMed ID: 21389856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. The effects of hearing aid use on listening effort and mental fatigue associated with sustained speech processing demands.
    Hornsby BW
    Ear Hear; 2013 Sep; 34(5):523-34. PubMed ID: 23426091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. A comparison of two-channel and single-channel compression hearing aids.
    Moore BC; Glasberg BR
    Audiology; 1986; 25(4-5):210-26. PubMed ID: 3566630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Objective and subjective results of the Bonebridge transcutaneous active direct-drive bone conduction hearing implant.
    Alzhrani F
    Saudi Med J; 2019 Aug; 40(8):797-801. PubMed ID: 31423516
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. The impact of head angle on monaural and binaural performance with directional and omnidirectional hearing aids.
    Ricketts T
    Ear Hear; 2000 Aug; 21(4):318-28. PubMed ID: 10981608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Selecting Appropriate Tests to Assess the Benefits of Bilateral Amplification With Hearing Aids.
    van Schoonhoven J; Schulte M; Boymans M; Wagener KC; Dreschler WA; Kollmeier B
    Trends Hear; 2016 Jul; 20():. PubMed ID: 27460871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Predicted and measured speech recognition performance in noise with linear amplification.
    Magnusson L; Karlsson M; Leijon A
    Ear Hear; 2001 Feb; 22(1):46-57. PubMed ID: 11271975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Active middle ear implant compared with open-fit hearing aid in sloping high-frequency sensorineural hearing loss.
    Boeheim K; Pok SM; Schloegel M; Filzmoser P
    Otol Neurotol; 2010 Apr; 31(3):424-9. PubMed ID: 20042907
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.