204 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31843274)
1. Comparing survival outcomes between surgical and radiographic lymph node assessment in locally advanced cervical cancer: A propensity score-matched analysis.
Yang J; Delara R; Magrina J; Magtibay P; Yi J; Langstraat C; Robertson M; Dinh T; Butler K
Gynecol Oncol; 2020 Feb; 156(2):320-327. PubMed ID: 31843274
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of salvage therapies for isolated para-aortic lymph node recurrence in patients with uterine cervical cancer after definitive treatment.
Kubota H; Tsujino K; Sulaiman NS; Sekii S; Matsumoto Y; Ota Y; Soejima T; Yamaguchi S; Sasaki R
Radiat Oncol; 2019 Dec; 14(1):236. PubMed ID: 31878944
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Outcomes and prognostic factors in patients with locally advanced cervical cancer treated with concurrent chemoradiotherapy.
Liu J; Tang G; Zhou Q; Kuang W
Radiat Oncol; 2022 Aug; 17(1):142. PubMed ID: 35978412
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Low-dose, prophylactic, extended-field, intensity-modulated radiotherapy plus concurrent weekly cisplatin for patients with stage IB2-IIIB cervical cancer, positive pelvic lymph nodes, and negative para-aortic lymph nodes.
Liang JA; Chen SW; Hung YC; Yeh LS; Chang WC; Lin WC; Chang YY
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2014 Jun; 24(5):901-7. PubMed ID: 23975081
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Matched-case comparison for the role of surgery in FIGO stage Ib1-IIa squamous cell carcinoma of cervix and suspicious para-aortic lymph node metastasis.
Kim HS; Park NH; Wu HG; Cho JY; Chung HH; Kim JW; Song YS; Kim SH; Kang SB
Ann Surg Oncol; 2009 Jan; 16(1):133-9. PubMed ID: 18979134
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Maximum Standardized Uptake Value of Pelvic Lymph Nodes in [18F]-Fluorodeoxyglucose Positron Emission Tomography Is a Prognostic Factor for Para-Aortic Lymph Node Recurrence in Pelvic Node-Positive Cervical Cancer Treated With Definitive Chemoradiotherapy.
Kim DH; Kim WT; Bae JS; Ki YK; Park D; Suh DS; Kim KH; Lee JH; Lee JY; Jeon HS; Nam JH
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2016 Sep; 26(7):1274-80. PubMed ID: 27465890
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Long-term oncological outcomes after laparoscopic versus abdominal radical hysterectomy in stage I a2- II a2 cervical cancer: a matched cohort study].
Wang W; Shang C; Huang J; Chen S; Shen H; Yao S
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2015 Dec; 50(12):894-901. PubMed ID: 26887872
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Prognostic factors associated with radiotherapy for cervical cancer with computed tomography-detected para-aortic lymph node metastasis.
Wu SY; Huang EY; Chanchien CC; Lin H; Wang CJ; Sun LM; Chen HC; Fang FM; Hsu HC; Huang YJ
J Radiat Res; 2014 Jan; 55(1):129-38. PubMed ID: 23814113
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Isolated para-aortic lymph node metastasis in FIGO stage IA2-IB2 carcinoma of the cervix: Revisiting the role of surgical assessment.
Del Carmen MG; Pareja R; Melamed A; Rodriguez J; Greer A; Clark RM; Rice LW
Gynecol Oncol; 2018 Sep; 150(3):406-411. PubMed ID: 30017539
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Outcomes and prognostic factors of advanced squamous cervical cancer after concurrent chemoradiotherapy].
Binbin T; Lingying W; Manni H; Jusheng A; Ning L
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2014 May; 49(5):348-54. PubMed ID: 25030731
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The Prognosis and Risk Stratification Based on Pelvic Lymph Node Characteristics in Patients With Locally Advanced Cervical Squamous Cell Carcinoma Treated With Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy.
Li X; Wei LC; Zhang Y; Zhao LN; Li WW; Ping LJ; Dang YZ; Hu J; Shi M
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2016 Oct; 26(8):1472-9. PubMed ID: 27400321
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of pelvic and para-aortic lymphadenectomy versus para-aortic lymphadenectomy alone for locally advanced FIGO stage IB2 to IIB cervical cancer using a propensity score matching analysis: Results from the FRANCOGYN study group.
Bendifallah S; de Foucher T; Ouldamer L; Bricou A; Lavoue V; Varinot J; Canlorbe G; Carcopino X; Raimond E; Huguet F; Graesslin O; Touboul C; Collinet P; Huchon C; Daraï E; Ballester M;
Eur J Surg Oncol; 2018 Dec; 44(12):1921-1928. PubMed ID: 30213717
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Prediction model for para-aortic lymph node metastasis in patients with locally advanced cervical cancer.
Shim SH; Kim DY; Lee SJ; Kim SN; Kang SB; Lee SW; Park JY; Suh DS; Kim JH; Kim YM; Kim YT; Nam JH
Gynecol Oncol; 2017 Jan; 144(1):40-45. PubMed ID: 27855989
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Surgical versus radiographic determination of para-aortic lymph node metastases before chemoradiation for locally advanced cervical carcinoma: a Gynecologic Oncology Group Study.
Gold MA; Tian C; Whitney CW; Rose PG; Lanciano R
Cancer; 2008 May; 112(9):1954-63. PubMed ID: 18338811
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Should the Presence of Metastatic Para-Aortic Lymph Nodes in Locally Advanced Cervical Cancer Lead to More Aggressive Treatment Strategies?
Benito V; Carballo S; Silva P; Esparza M; Arencibia O; Federico M; Andújar M; Mori M; Medina N; Lubrano A
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2017; 24(4):609-616. PubMed ID: 28161495
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Clinical analysis of 32 cases with neuroendocrine carcinoma of the uterine cervix in early-stage disease].
Wang Z; Wu L; Yao H; Sun Y; Li X; Li B; Zhang R; Ma S; Huang M
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2015 Mar; 50(3):198-203. PubMed ID: 26268410
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Assessment of retroperitoneal lymph node status in locally advanced cervical cancer.
Li W; Xiong L; Zhu Q; Lu H; Zhong M; Liang M; Jiang W; Wang Y; Cheng W
BMC Cancer; 2021 May; 21(1):484. PubMed ID: 33933005
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Patterns of Recurrence in Node-Positive Cervical Cancer Patients Treated With Contemporary Chemoradiation and Dose Escalation: A Multi-Institutional Study.
Sethi R; Mayadev J; Sethi S; Rash D; Chen LM; Brooks R; Ueda S; Hsu IC
Pract Radiat Oncol; 2019 Mar; 9(2):e180-e186. PubMed ID: 30342181
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Para-aortic lymph node metastases in locally advanced cervical cancer: Comparison between surgical staging and imaging.
Vandeperre A; Van Limbergen E; Leunen K; Moerman P; Amant F; Vergote I
Gynecol Oncol; 2015 Aug; 138(2):299-303. PubMed ID: 26007204
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Survival effect of laparoscopic para-aortic staging in locally advanced cervical cancer: a retrospective cohort analysis.
Pomel C; Martinez A; Bourgin C; Beguinot M; Benoit C; Naik R; Dauplat J; Lebouedec G; Ferron G
BJOG; 2017 Jun; 124(7):1089-1094. PubMed ID: 28128517
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
