170 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31843621)
1. Shockwave Lithotripsy Use in the State of Michigan: American Urological Association Guideline Adherence and Clinical Implications.
Dauw CA; Swarna K; Qi J; Kim T; Leavitt D; Leese J; Abdelhady M; Witzke K; Hollingsworth JM; Ghani KR
Urology; 2020 Mar; 137():38-44. PubMed ID: 31843621
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Cost-effectiveness comparison of renal calculi treated with ureteroscopic laser lithotripsy versus shockwave lithotripsy.
Cone EB; Eisner BH; Ursiny M; Pareek G
J Endourol; 2014 Jun; 28(6):639-43. PubMed ID: 24444144
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Variation and Correlation in Postoperative Imaging After Shockwave Lithotripsy and Ureteroscopy by Treatment Modality: Results of a Statewide Clinical Registry.
DiBianco JM; Daignault-Newton S; Conrado B; Jafri SM; Korman H; Johnson J; Ghani KR; Dauw CA
Urology; 2022 Oct; 168():79-85. PubMed ID: 35809701
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Is extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy (SWL) still suitable for >1.5 cm intrarenal stones? Data analysis of 1902 SWLs.
Azal Neto W; Morales E; Joseane Pachecco M; Pedro RN; Reis LO
Scand J Urol; 2021 Oct; 55(5):388-393. PubMed ID: 34279162
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Cost-effectiveness comparison of ureteral calculi treated with ureteroscopic laser lithotripsy versus shockwave lithotripsy.
Cone EB; Pareek G; Ursiny M; Eisner B
World J Urol; 2017 Jan; 35(1):161-166. PubMed ID: 27145788
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Variable Use of Postoperative Imaging Following Ureteroscopy: Results from a Statewide Quality Improvement Collaborative.
Dauw CA; Ghani KR; Qi J; Kim T; Telang J; Seifman B; Jafri M; Blix G; Hollingsworth JM
Urology; 2020 Feb; 136():63-69. PubMed ID: 31618657
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Extracorporeal Shockwave Lithotripsy Versus Flexible Ureteroscopy for the Management of Upper Tract Urinary Stones in Children.
Freton L; Peyronnet B; Arnaud A; Tondut L; Hascoet J; Pradère B; Verhoest G; Habonimana É; Azzis O; Fremond B; Bensalah K
J Endourol; 2017 Jan; 31(1):1-6. PubMed ID: 27824261
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Prospective comparison of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy versus flexible ureterorenoscopy in patients with non-lower pole kidney stones under the COVID-19 pandemic.
Bai S; Zhan Y; Pan C; Liu G; Li J; Shan L
Urolithiasis; 2023 Feb; 51(1):38. PubMed ID: 36795174
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Flexible Ureterorenoscopy Versus Shockwave Lithotripsy for Kidney Stones ≤2 cm: A Randomized Controlled Trial.
Bosio A; Alessandria E; Dalmasso E; Agosti S; Vitiello F; Vercelli E; Bisconti A; Gontero P
Eur Urol Focus; 2022 Nov; 8(6):1816-1822. PubMed ID: 35466071
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. What are the Benefits and Harms of Ureteroscopy Compared with Shock-wave Lithotripsy in the Treatment of Upper Ureteral Stones? A Systematic Review.
Drake T; Grivas N; Dabestani S; Knoll T; Lam T; Maclennan S; Petrik A; Skolarikos A; Straub M; Tuerk C; Yuan CY; Sarica K
Eur Urol; 2017 Nov; 72(5):772-786. PubMed ID: 28456350
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Treatment for extended-mid and distal ureteral stones: SWL or ureteroscopy? Results of a multicenter study.
Hendrikx AJ; Strijbos WE; de Knijff DW; Kums JJ; Doesburg WH; Lemmens WA
J Endourol; 1999 Dec; 13(10):727-33. PubMed ID: 10646679
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Management patterns of medicare patients undergoing treatment for upper urinary tract calculi.
Matlaga BR; Meckley LM; Kim M; Byrne TW
J Endourol; 2014 Jun; 28(6):723-8. PubMed ID: 24344933
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Prospective, randomized trial comparing shock wave lithotripsy and ureteroscopy for lower pole caliceal calculi 1 cm or less.
Pearle MS; Lingeman JE; Leveillee R; Kuo R; Preminger GM; Nadler RB; Macaluso J; Monga M; Kumar U; Dushinski J; Albala DM; Wolf JS; Assimos D; Fabrizio M; Munch LC; Nakada SY; Auge B; Honey J; Ogan K; Pattaras J; McDougall EM; Averch TD; Turk T; Pietrow P; Watkins S
J Urol; 2005 Jun; 173(6):2005-9. PubMed ID: 15879805
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy compared with ureteroscopy for the removal of small distal ureteral stones.
Hautmann S; Friedrich MG; Fernandez S; Steuber T; Hammerer P; Braun PM; Jünemann KP; Huland H
Urol Int; 2004; 73(3):238-43. PubMed ID: 15539843
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Miniature semi-rigid ureteroscopy with holmium-yttrium-aluminium-garnet laser vs shockwave lithotripsy in the management of upper urinary tract stones >1 cm in children.
Omran M; Sakr A; Desoky EAE; Ali MM; Abdalla MMH
Arab J Urol; 2020 Mar; 18(2):106-111. PubMed ID: 33029415
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Regional Variation in Shock Wave Lithotripsy Utilization Among Medicare Patients with Nephrolithiasis.
Rezaee ME; Tundo GN; Goodney PP; Pais VM
Urology; 2019 Nov; 133():103-108. PubMed ID: 31377258
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Factors Associated with Regional Adoption of Ureteroscopy in California from 2005 to 2016.
Wiener SV; Stoller ML; Boscardin J; Suskind AM
J Endourol; 2019 Jan; 33(1):9-15. PubMed ID: 30458114
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Primary SWL Is an Efficient and Cost-Effective Treatment for Lower Pole Renal Stones Between 10 and 20 mm in Size: A Large Single Center Study.
Chan LH; Good DW; Laing K; Phipps S; Thomas BG; Keanie JY; Tolley DA; Cutress ML
J Endourol; 2017 May; 31(5):510-516. PubMed ID: 28355100
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Ureteroscopy and laser stone fragmentation (URSL) for large (≥1 cm) paediatric stones: Outcomes from a university teaching hospital.
Featherstone NC; Somani BK; Griffin SJ
J Pediatr Urol; 2017 Apr; 13(2):202.e1-202.e7. PubMed ID: 28336220
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. No Wound for Stones <2 cm in Horseshoe Kidney: A Systematic Review of Comparative Studies.
Chen H; Chen G; Pan Y; Zhu Y; Xiong C; Chen H; Yang Z
Urol Int; 2019; 103(3):249-255. PubMed ID: 31096234
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
