These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

168 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31843621)

  • 1. Shockwave Lithotripsy Use in the State of Michigan: American Urological Association Guideline Adherence and Clinical Implications.
    Dauw CA; Swarna K; Qi J; Kim T; Leavitt D; Leese J; Abdelhady M; Witzke K; Hollingsworth JM; Ghani KR
    Urology; 2020 Mar; 137():38-44. PubMed ID: 31843621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Cost-effectiveness comparison of renal calculi treated with ureteroscopic laser lithotripsy versus shockwave lithotripsy.
    Cone EB; Eisner BH; Ursiny M; Pareek G
    J Endourol; 2014 Jun; 28(6):639-43. PubMed ID: 24444144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Variation and Correlation in Postoperative Imaging After Shockwave Lithotripsy and Ureteroscopy by Treatment Modality: Results of a Statewide Clinical Registry.
    DiBianco JM; Daignault-Newton S; Conrado B; Jafri SM; Korman H; Johnson J; Ghani KR; Dauw CA
    Urology; 2022 Oct; 168():79-85. PubMed ID: 35809701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Is extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy (SWL) still suitable for >1.5 cm intrarenal stones? Data analysis of 1902 SWLs.
    Azal Neto W; Morales E; Joseane Pachecco M; Pedro RN; Reis LO
    Scand J Urol; 2021 Oct; 55(5):388-393. PubMed ID: 34279162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Cost-effectiveness comparison of ureteral calculi treated with ureteroscopic laser lithotripsy versus shockwave lithotripsy.
    Cone EB; Pareek G; Ursiny M; Eisner B
    World J Urol; 2017 Jan; 35(1):161-166. PubMed ID: 27145788
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Variable Use of Postoperative Imaging Following Ureteroscopy: Results from a Statewide Quality Improvement Collaborative.
    Dauw CA; Ghani KR; Qi J; Kim T; Telang J; Seifman B; Jafri M; Blix G; Hollingsworth JM
    Urology; 2020 Feb; 136():63-69. PubMed ID: 31618657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Extracorporeal Shockwave Lithotripsy Versus Flexible Ureteroscopy for the Management of Upper Tract Urinary Stones in Children.
    Freton L; Peyronnet B; Arnaud A; Tondut L; Hascoet J; Pradère B; Verhoest G; Habonimana É; Azzis O; Fremond B; Bensalah K
    J Endourol; 2017 Jan; 31(1):1-6. PubMed ID: 27824261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Prospective comparison of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy versus flexible ureterorenoscopy in patients with non-lower pole kidney stones under the COVID-19 pandemic.
    Bai S; Zhan Y; Pan C; Liu G; Li J; Shan L
    Urolithiasis; 2023 Feb; 51(1):38. PubMed ID: 36795174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Flexible Ureterorenoscopy Versus Shockwave Lithotripsy for Kidney Stones ≤2 cm: A Randomized Controlled Trial.
    Bosio A; Alessandria E; Dalmasso E; Agosti S; Vitiello F; Vercelli E; Bisconti A; Gontero P
    Eur Urol Focus; 2022 Nov; 8(6):1816-1822. PubMed ID: 35466071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. What are the Benefits and Harms of Ureteroscopy Compared with Shock-wave Lithotripsy in the Treatment of Upper Ureteral Stones? A Systematic Review.
    Drake T; Grivas N; Dabestani S; Knoll T; Lam T; Maclennan S; Petrik A; Skolarikos A; Straub M; Tuerk C; Yuan CY; Sarica K
    Eur Urol; 2017 Nov; 72(5):772-786. PubMed ID: 28456350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Treatment for extended-mid and distal ureteral stones: SWL or ureteroscopy? Results of a multicenter study.
    Hendrikx AJ; Strijbos WE; de Knijff DW; Kums JJ; Doesburg WH; Lemmens WA
    J Endourol; 1999 Dec; 13(10):727-33. PubMed ID: 10646679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Management patterns of medicare patients undergoing treatment for upper urinary tract calculi.
    Matlaga BR; Meckley LM; Kim M; Byrne TW
    J Endourol; 2014 Jun; 28(6):723-8. PubMed ID: 24344933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Prospective, randomized trial comparing shock wave lithotripsy and ureteroscopy for lower pole caliceal calculi 1 cm or less.
    Pearle MS; Lingeman JE; Leveillee R; Kuo R; Preminger GM; Nadler RB; Macaluso J; Monga M; Kumar U; Dushinski J; Albala DM; Wolf JS; Assimos D; Fabrizio M; Munch LC; Nakada SY; Auge B; Honey J; Ogan K; Pattaras J; McDougall EM; Averch TD; Turk T; Pietrow P; Watkins S
    J Urol; 2005 Jun; 173(6):2005-9. PubMed ID: 15879805
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy compared with ureteroscopy for the removal of small distal ureteral stones.
    Hautmann S; Friedrich MG; Fernandez S; Steuber T; Hammerer P; Braun PM; Jünemann KP; Huland H
    Urol Int; 2004; 73(3):238-43. PubMed ID: 15539843
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Miniature semi-rigid ureteroscopy with holmium-yttrium-aluminium-garnet laser vs shockwave lithotripsy in the management of upper urinary tract stones >1 cm in children.
    Omran M; Sakr A; Desoky EAE; Ali MM; Abdalla MMH
    Arab J Urol; 2020 Mar; 18(2):106-111. PubMed ID: 33029415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Regional Variation in Shock Wave Lithotripsy Utilization Among Medicare Patients with Nephrolithiasis.
    Rezaee ME; Tundo GN; Goodney PP; Pais VM
    Urology; 2019 Nov; 133():103-108. PubMed ID: 31377258
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Factors Associated with Regional Adoption of Ureteroscopy in California from 2005 to 2016.
    Wiener SV; Stoller ML; Boscardin J; Suskind AM
    J Endourol; 2019 Jan; 33(1):9-15. PubMed ID: 30458114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Primary SWL Is an Efficient and Cost-Effective Treatment for Lower Pole Renal Stones Between 10 and 20 mm in Size: A Large Single Center Study.
    Chan LH; Good DW; Laing K; Phipps S; Thomas BG; Keanie JY; Tolley DA; Cutress ML
    J Endourol; 2017 May; 31(5):510-516. PubMed ID: 28355100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Ureteroscopy and laser stone fragmentation (URSL) for large (≥1 cm) paediatric stones: Outcomes from a university teaching hospital.
    Featherstone NC; Somani BK; Griffin SJ
    J Pediatr Urol; 2017 Apr; 13(2):202.e1-202.e7. PubMed ID: 28336220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. No Wound for Stones <2 cm in Horseshoe Kidney: A Systematic Review of Comparative Studies.
    Chen H; Chen G; Pan Y; Zhu Y; Xiong C; Chen H; Yang Z
    Urol Int; 2019; 103(3):249-255. PubMed ID: 31096234
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.