291 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31843846)
1. Chinese multicentre prospective registry of breast cancer patient-reported outcome-reconstruction and oncoplastic cohort (PRO-ROC): a study protocol.
Li L; Yang B; Li H; Yin J; Jin F; Han S; Liao N; Shi J; Ling R; Li Z; Ouyang L; Wang X; Fu P; Ouyang Z; Ma B; Wu X; Wang H; Liu J; Shao Z; Wu J
BMJ Open; 2019 Dec; 9(12):e032945. PubMed ID: 31843846
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Protocol for a mixed-method study to inform the feasibility of undertaking a large-scale multicentre study comparing the clinical and patient-reported outcomes of oncoplastic breast conservation as an alternative to mastectomy with or without immediate breast reconstruction in women unsuitable for standard breast-conserving surgery (the ANTHEM Feasibility Study).
Davies C; Holcombe C; Skillman J; Whisker L; Hollingworth W; Conefrey C; Mills N; White P; Comins C; Macmillan D; Fairbrother P; Potter S
BMJ Open; 2021 Apr; 11(4):e046622. PubMed ID: 33863715
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The COSMAM TRIAL a prospective cohort study of quality of life and cosmetic outcome in patients undergoing breast conserving surgery.
Catsman CJLM; Beek MA; Voogd AC; Mulder PGH; Luiten EJT
BMC Cancer; 2018 Apr; 18(1):456. PubMed ID: 29688847
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Protocol for a multicentre, prospective, cohort study to investigate patient satisfaction and quality of life after immediate breast reconstruction in Japan: the SAQLA study.
Saiga M; Hosoya Y; Utsunomiya H; Kuramoto Y; Watanabe S; Tomita K; Aihara Y; Muto M; Hikosaka M; Kawaguchi T; Miyaji T; Yamaguchi T; Zenda S; Goto A; Sakuraba M; Kusano T; Miyabe K; Kuroki T; Yano T; Taminato M; Sekido M; Tsunoda Y; Satake T; Doihara H; Kimata Y
BMJ Open; 2021 Feb; 11(2):e042099. PubMed ID: 33589456
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparing oncoplastic breast conserving surgery with mastectomy and immediate breast reconstruction: Case-matched patient reported outcomes.
Kelsall JE; McCulley SJ; Brock L; Akerlund MTE; Macmillan RD
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2017 Oct; 70(10):1377-1385. PubMed ID: 28712883
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Objective assessment of clinical, oncological and cosmetic outcomes following volume replacement in patients undergoing oncoplastic breast-conserving surgery: protocol for a systematic review.
Hu J; Rainsbury RM; Segaran A; Predescu O; Roy PG
BMJ Open; 2018 Jul; 8(7):e020859. PubMed ID: 30030314
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Health-related quality of life by type of breast surgery in women with primary breast cancer: prospective longitudinal cohort study.
Gulis K; Ellbrant J; Bendahl PO; Svensjö T; Rydén L
BJS Open; 2024 May; 8(3):. PubMed ID: 38829692
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The Pre-BRA (pre-pectoral Breast Reconstruction EvAluation) feasibility study: protocol for a mixed-methods IDEAL 2a/2b prospective cohort study to determine the safety and effectiveness of prepectoral implant-based breast reconstruction.
Harvey KL; Mills N; White P; Holcombe C; Potter S;
BMJ Open; 2020 Jan; 10(1):e033641. PubMed ID: 31988232
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Protocol for a national cohort study to explore the long-term clinical and patient-reported outcomes and cost-effectiveness of implant-based and autologous breast reconstruction after mastectomy for breast cancer: the brighter study.
Johnson L; Holcombe C; O'Donoghue JM; Jeevan R; Browne J; Fairbrother P; MacKenzie M; Gulliver-Clarke C; White P; Mohiuddin S; Hollingworth W; Potter S
BMJ Open; 2021 Aug; 11(8):e054055. PubMed ID: 34408062
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The impact of age on patient-reported outcomes after oncoplastic versus conventional breast cancer surgery.
Ritter M; Ling BM; Oberhauser I; Montagna G; Zehnpfennig L; Lévy J; Soysal SD; Castrezana LL; Müller M; Schwab FD; Kurzeder C; Haug M; Weber WP; Kappos EA
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2021 Jun; 187(2):437-446. PubMed ID: 33606158
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The impact of delayed wound healing on patient-reported outcomes after breast cancer surgery.
Zehnpfennig L; Ritter M; Montagna G; Handschin TM; Ling BM; Oberhauser I; Lévy J; Schaefer KM; Maggi N; Soysal SD; Castrezana López L; Müller MM; Schwab FD; Haug M; Weber WP; Kurzeder C; Kappos EA
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2022 Nov; 75(11):4125-4132. PubMed ID: 36153297
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Protocol for the BRECAR study: a prospective cohort follow-up on the impact of breast reconstruction timing on health-related quality of life in women with breast cancer.
Herrera de la Muela M; García López E; Frías Aldeguer L; Gómez-Campelo P;
BMJ Open; 2017 Dec; 7(12):e018108. PubMed ID: 29259059
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of clinicopathologic, cosmetic and quality of life outcomes in 700 oncoplastic and conventional breast-conserving surgery cases: A single-centre retrospective study.
Kelemen P; Pukancsik D; Újhelyi M; Sávolt Á; Kovács E; Ivády G; Kenessey I; Kovács T; Stamatiou A; Smanykó V; Mátrai Z
Eur J Surg Oncol; 2019 Feb; 45(2):118-124. PubMed ID: 30352766
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Quality of life after oncoplastic breast-conserving surgery: a systematic review.
Aristokleous I; Saddiq M
ANZ J Surg; 2019 Jun; 89(6):639-646. PubMed ID: 30977582
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Measuring quality of life in oncologic breast surgery: a systematic review of patient-reported outcome measures.
Chen CM; Cano SJ; Klassen AF; King T; McCarthy C; Cordeiro PG; Morrow M; Pusic AL
Breast J; 2010; 16(6):587-97. PubMed ID: 21070435
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Quality of life after mastectomy with or without immediate breast reconstruction.
Dauplat J; Kwiatkowski F; Rouanet P; Delay E; Clough K; Verhaeghe JL; Raoust I; Houvenaeghel G; Lemasurier P; Thivat E; Pomel C;
Br J Surg; 2017 Aug; 104(9):1197-1206. PubMed ID: 28401542
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Patient-reported outcome after oncoplastic breast surgery compared with conventional breast-conserving surgery in breast cancer.
Rose M; Svensson H; Handler J; Hoyer U; Ringberg A; Manjer J
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2020 Feb; 180(1):247-256. PubMed ID: 31989380
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The early development phases of a European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) module to assess patient reported outcomes (PROs) in women undergoing breast reconstruction.
Thomson HJ; Winters ZE; Brandberg Y; Didier F; Blazeby JM; Mills J
Eur J Cancer; 2013 Mar; 49(5):1018-26. PubMed ID: 23063353
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Muscle-Sparing Skin-Reducing Breast Reconstruction with Pre-Pectoral Implants in Breast Cancer Patients: Long-Term Assessment of Patients' Satisfaction and Quality of Life.
Domenici L; Caputo GG; Losco L; Di Taranto G; Lo Torto F; Pierazzi DM; Governa M; Benedetti Panici P; Ribuffo D; Cigna E
J Invest Surg; 2022 Apr; 35(4):841-847. PubMed ID: 34015977
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The influence of simultaneous integrated boost, hypofractionation and oncoplastic surgery on cosmetic outcome and PROMs after breast conserving therapy.
Lansu JT; Essers M; Voogd AC; Luiten EJ; Buijs C; Groenendaal N; Poortmans PM
Eur J Surg Oncol; 2015 Oct; 41(10):1411-6. PubMed ID: 26260375
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
