These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

298 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31843846)

  • 1. Chinese multicentre prospective registry of breast cancer patient-reported outcome-reconstruction and oncoplastic cohort (PRO-ROC): a study protocol.
    Li L; Yang B; Li H; Yin J; Jin F; Han S; Liao N; Shi J; Ling R; Li Z; Ouyang L; Wang X; Fu P; Ouyang Z; Ma B; Wu X; Wang H; Liu J; Shao Z; Wu J
    BMJ Open; 2019 Dec; 9(12):e032945. PubMed ID: 31843846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Protocol for a mixed-method study to inform the feasibility of undertaking a large-scale multicentre study comparing the clinical and patient-reported outcomes of oncoplastic breast conservation as an alternative to mastectomy with or without immediate breast reconstruction in women unsuitable for standard breast-conserving surgery (the ANTHEM Feasibility Study).
    Davies C; Holcombe C; Skillman J; Whisker L; Hollingworth W; Conefrey C; Mills N; White P; Comins C; Macmillan D; Fairbrother P; Potter S
    BMJ Open; 2021 Apr; 11(4):e046622. PubMed ID: 33863715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The COSMAM TRIAL a prospective cohort study of quality of life and cosmetic outcome in patients undergoing breast conserving surgery.
    Catsman CJLM; Beek MA; Voogd AC; Mulder PGH; Luiten EJT
    BMC Cancer; 2018 Apr; 18(1):456. PubMed ID: 29688847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Protocol for a multicentre, prospective, cohort study to investigate patient satisfaction and quality of life after immediate breast reconstruction in Japan: the SAQLA study.
    Saiga M; Hosoya Y; Utsunomiya H; Kuramoto Y; Watanabe S; Tomita K; Aihara Y; Muto M; Hikosaka M; Kawaguchi T; Miyaji T; Yamaguchi T; Zenda S; Goto A; Sakuraba M; Kusano T; Miyabe K; Kuroki T; Yano T; Taminato M; Sekido M; Tsunoda Y; Satake T; Doihara H; Kimata Y
    BMJ Open; 2021 Feb; 11(2):e042099. PubMed ID: 33589456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparing oncoplastic breast conserving surgery with mastectomy and immediate breast reconstruction: Case-matched patient reported outcomes.
    Kelsall JE; McCulley SJ; Brock L; Akerlund MTE; Macmillan RD
    J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2017 Oct; 70(10):1377-1385. PubMed ID: 28712883
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Objective assessment of clinical, oncological and cosmetic outcomes following volume replacement in patients undergoing oncoplastic breast-conserving surgery: protocol for a systematic review.
    Hu J; Rainsbury RM; Segaran A; Predescu O; Roy PG
    BMJ Open; 2018 Jul; 8(7):e020859. PubMed ID: 30030314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The Pre-BRA (pre-pectoral Breast Reconstruction EvAluation) feasibility study: protocol for a mixed-methods IDEAL 2a/2b prospective cohort study to determine the safety and effectiveness of prepectoral implant-based breast reconstruction.
    Harvey KL; Mills N; White P; Holcombe C; Potter S;
    BMJ Open; 2020 Jan; 10(1):e033641. PubMed ID: 31988232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Health-related quality of life by type of breast surgery in women with primary breast cancer: prospective longitudinal cohort study.
    Gulis K; Ellbrant J; Bendahl PO; Svensjö T; Rydén L
    BJS Open; 2024 May; 8(3):. PubMed ID: 38829692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Protocol for a national cohort study to explore the long-term clinical and patient-reported outcomes and cost-effectiveness of implant-based and autologous breast reconstruction after mastectomy for breast cancer: the brighter study.
    Johnson L; Holcombe C; O'Donoghue JM; Jeevan R; Browne J; Fairbrother P; MacKenzie M; Gulliver-Clarke C; White P; Mohiuddin S; Hollingworth W; Potter S
    BMJ Open; 2021 Aug; 11(8):e054055. PubMed ID: 34408062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The impact of age on patient-reported outcomes after oncoplastic versus conventional breast cancer surgery.
    Ritter M; Ling BM; Oberhauser I; Montagna G; Zehnpfennig L; Lévy J; Soysal SD; Castrezana LL; Müller M; Schwab FD; Kurzeder C; Haug M; Weber WP; Kappos EA
    Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2021 Jun; 187(2):437-446. PubMed ID: 33606158
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The impact of delayed wound healing on patient-reported outcomes after breast cancer surgery.
    Zehnpfennig L; Ritter M; Montagna G; Handschin TM; Ling BM; Oberhauser I; Lévy J; Schaefer KM; Maggi N; Soysal SD; Castrezana López L; Müller MM; Schwab FD; Haug M; Weber WP; Kurzeder C; Kappos EA
    J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2022 Nov; 75(11):4125-4132. PubMed ID: 36153297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Protocol for the BRECAR study: a prospective cohort follow-up on the impact of breast reconstruction timing on health-related quality of life in women with breast cancer.
    Herrera de la Muela M; García López E; Frías Aldeguer L; Gómez-Campelo P;
    BMJ Open; 2017 Dec; 7(12):e018108. PubMed ID: 29259059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of clinicopathologic, cosmetic and quality of life outcomes in 700 oncoplastic and conventional breast-conserving surgery cases: A single-centre retrospective study.
    Kelemen P; Pukancsik D; Újhelyi M; Sávolt Á; Kovács E; Ivády G; Kenessey I; Kovács T; Stamatiou A; Smanykó V; Mátrai Z
    Eur J Surg Oncol; 2019 Feb; 45(2):118-124. PubMed ID: 30352766
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Quality of life after oncoplastic breast-conserving surgery: a systematic review.
    Aristokleous I; Saddiq M
    ANZ J Surg; 2019 Jun; 89(6):639-646. PubMed ID: 30977582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Measuring quality of life in oncologic breast surgery: a systematic review of patient-reported outcome measures.
    Chen CM; Cano SJ; Klassen AF; King T; McCarthy C; Cordeiro PG; Morrow M; Pusic AL
    Breast J; 2010; 16(6):587-97. PubMed ID: 21070435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Quality of life after mastectomy with or without immediate breast reconstruction.
    Dauplat J; Kwiatkowski F; Rouanet P; Delay E; Clough K; Verhaeghe JL; Raoust I; Houvenaeghel G; Lemasurier P; Thivat E; Pomel C;
    Br J Surg; 2017 Aug; 104(9):1197-1206. PubMed ID: 28401542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Patient-reported outcome after oncoplastic breast surgery compared with conventional breast-conserving surgery in breast cancer.
    Rose M; Svensson H; Handler J; Hoyer U; Ringberg A; Manjer J
    Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2020 Feb; 180(1):247-256. PubMed ID: 31989380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The early development phases of a European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) module to assess patient reported outcomes (PROs) in women undergoing breast reconstruction.
    Thomson HJ; Winters ZE; Brandberg Y; Didier F; Blazeby JM; Mills J
    Eur J Cancer; 2013 Mar; 49(5):1018-26. PubMed ID: 23063353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Muscle-Sparing Skin-Reducing Breast Reconstruction with Pre-Pectoral Implants in Breast Cancer Patients: Long-Term Assessment of Patients' Satisfaction and Quality of Life.
    Domenici L; Caputo GG; Losco L; Di Taranto G; Lo Torto F; Pierazzi DM; Governa M; Benedetti Panici P; Ribuffo D; Cigna E
    J Invest Surg; 2022 Apr; 35(4):841-847. PubMed ID: 34015977
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The influence of simultaneous integrated boost, hypofractionation and oncoplastic surgery on cosmetic outcome and PROMs after breast conserving therapy.
    Lansu JT; Essers M; Voogd AC; Luiten EJ; Buijs C; Groenendaal N; Poortmans PM
    Eur J Surg Oncol; 2015 Oct; 41(10):1411-6. PubMed ID: 26260375
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.