These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

128 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31844504)

  • 21. Photochemical model evaluation of 2013 California wild fire air quality impacts using surface, aircraft, and satellite data.
    Baker KR; Woody MC; Valin L; Szykman J; Yates EL; Iraci LT; Choi HD; Soja AJ; Koplitz SN; Zhou L; Campuzano-Jost P; Jimenez JL; Hair JW
    Sci Total Environ; 2018 Oct; 637-638():1137-1149. PubMed ID: 29801207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Evaluation of the offline-coupled GFSv15-FV3-CMAQv5.0.2 in support of the next-generation National Air Quality Forecast Capability over the contiguous United States.
    Chen X; Zhang Y; Wang K; Tong D; Lee P; Tang Y; Huang J; Campbell PC; Mcqueen J; Pye HOT; Murphy BN; Kang D
    Geosci Model Dev; 2021 Jun; 14(6):. PubMed ID: 34367521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Modeling an air pollution episode in northwestern United States: identifying the effect of nitrogen oxide and volatile organic compound emission changes on air pollutants formation using direct sensitivity analysis.
    Tsimpidi AP; Trail M; Hu Y; Nenes A; Russell AG
    J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2012 Oct; 62(10):1150-65. PubMed ID: 23155861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Mutual relationship between surface atmospheric pollutants and CG lightning in Tehran area.
    Gharaylou M; Mahmoudian A; Bidokhti AA; Dadras PS
    Environ Monit Assess; 2020 Dec; 192(12):809. PubMed ID: 33263799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Improving Estimates of PM
    Meskhidze N; Sutherland B; Ling X; Dawson K; Johnson MS; Henderson B; Hostetler CA; Ferrare RA
    Atmos Environ (1994); 2021 Apr; 250():. PubMed ID: 34381305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Application and evaluation of two air quality models for particulate matter for a southeastern U.S. episode.
    Zhang Y; Pun B; Wu SY; Vijayaraghavan K; Seigneur C
    J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2004 Dec; 54(12):1478-93. PubMed ID: 15648386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Observations and impacts of transported Canadian wildfire smoke on ozone and aerosol air quality in the Maryland region on June 9-12, 2015.
    Dreessen J; Sullivan J; Delgado R
    J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2016 Sep; 66(9):842-62. PubMed ID: 26963934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Impact of intercontinental pollution transport on North American ozone air pollution: an HTAP phase 2 multi-model study.
    Huang M; Carmichael GR; Pierce RB; Jo DS; Park RJ; Flemming J; Emmons LK; Bowman KW; Henze DK; Davila Y; Sudo K; Jonson JE; Lund MT; Janssens-Maenhout G; Dentener FJ; Keating TJ; Oetjen H; Payne VH
    Atmos Chem Phys; 2017 May; 17():5721-5750. PubMed ID: 29780406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Assessment and statistical modeling of the relationship between remotely sensed aerosol optical depth and PM2.5 in the eastern United States.
    Paciorek CJ; Liu Y;
    Res Rep Health Eff Inst; 2012 May; (167):5-83; discussion 85-91. PubMed ID: 22838153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. The London low emission zone baseline study.
    Kelly F; Armstrong B; Atkinson R; Anderson HR; Barratt B; Beevers S; Cook D; Green D; Derwent D; Mudway I; Wilkinson P;
    Res Rep Health Eff Inst; 2011 Nov; (163):3-79. PubMed ID: 22315924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. An historical experiment: Los Angeles smog evolution observed by blimp.
    Hidy GM
    J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2018 Jul; 68(7):643-655. PubMed ID: 29432064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. A diagnostic evaluation of modeled mercury wet depositions in Europe using atmospheric speciated high-resolution observations.
    Bieser J; De Simone F; Gencarelli C; Geyer B; Hedgecock I; Matthias V; Travnikov O; Weigelt A
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2014; 21(16):9995-10012. PubMed ID: 24764005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Impacts of different characterizations of large-scale background on simulated regional-scale ozone over the continental United States.
    Hogrefe C; Liu P; Pouliot G; Mathur R; Roselle S; Flemming J; Lin M; Park RJ
    Atmos Chem Phys; 2018; 18(5):3839-3864. PubMed ID: 30079085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Modeling stratospheric intrusion and trans-Pacific transport on tropospheric ozone using hemispheric CMAQ during April 2010 - Part 1: Model evaluation and air mass characterization for stratosphere-troposphere transport.
    Itahashi S; Mathur R; Hogrefe C; Zhang Y
    Atmos Chem Phys; 2020 Mar; 20(6):3373-3396. PubMed ID: 32328089
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. The impact of the congestion charging scheme on air quality in London. Part 1. Emissions modeling and analysis of air pollution measurements.
    Kelly F; Anderson HR; Armstrong B; Atkinson R; Barratt B; Beevers S; Derwent D; Green D; Mudway I; Wilkinson P;
    Res Rep Health Eff Inst; 2011 Apr; (155):5-71. PubMed ID: 21830496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. [Temporal and spatial distribution of ozone concentration by aircraft sounding over Beijing].
    Chen PF; Zhang Q; Quan JN; Gao Y; Huang MY
    Huan Jing Ke Xue; 2012 Dec; 33(12):4141-50. PubMed ID: 23379135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Contributions of natural emissions to ozone and PM2.5 as simulated by the Community Multiscale Air Quality (CMAQ) model.
    Mueller SF; Mallard JW
    Environ Sci Technol; 2011 Jun; 45(11):4817-23. PubMed ID: 21545154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Why do Models Overestimate Surface Ozone in the Southeastern United States?
    Travis KR; Jacob DJ; Fisher JA; Kim PS; Marais EA; Zhu L; Yu K; Miller CC; Yantosca RM; Sulprizio MP; Thompson AM; Wennberg PO; Crounse JD; St Clair JM; Cohen RC; Laughner JL; Dibb JE; Hall SR; Ullmann K; Wolfe GM; Pollack IB; Peischl J; Neuman JA; Zhou X
    Atmos Chem Phys; 2016; 16(21):13561-13577. PubMed ID: 29619045
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Global O
    Choi HD; Liu H; Crawford JH; Considine DB; Allen DJ; Duncan BN; Horowitz LW; Rodriguez JM; Strahan SE; Zhang L; Liu X; Damon MR; Steenrod SD
    Atmos Chem Phys; 2017; 17(13):8429-8452. PubMed ID: 32457810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Ozone response modeling to NOx and VOC emissions: Examining machine learning models.
    Kuo CP; Fu JS
    Environ Int; 2023 Jun; 176():107969. PubMed ID: 37201398
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.