These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

181 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31844582)

  • 21. ConReg-R: Extrapolative recalibration of the empirical distribution of p-values to improve false discovery rate estimates.
    Li J; Paramita P; Choi KP; Karuturi RK
    Biol Direct; 2011 May; 6():27. PubMed ID: 21595983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Resampling-based empirical Bayes multiple testing procedures for controlling generalized tail probability and expected value error rates: focus on the false discovery rate and simulation study.
    Dudoit S; Gilbert HN; van der Laan MJ
    Biom J; 2008 Oct; 50(5):716-44. PubMed ID: 18932138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Computationally efficient permutation-based confidence interval estimation for tail-area FDR.
    Millstein J; Volfson D
    Front Genet; 2013; 4():179. PubMed ID: 24062767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. A note on using permutation-based false discovery rate estimates to compare different analysis methods for microarray data.
    Xie Y; Pan W; Khodursky AB
    Bioinformatics; 2005 Dec; 21(23):4280-8. PubMed ID: 16188930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Analysis of multilocus models of association.
    Devlin B; Roeder K; Wasserman L
    Genet Epidemiol; 2003 Jul; 25(1):36-47. PubMed ID: 12813725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Rank-invariant resampling based estimation of false discovery rate for analysis of small sample microarray data.
    Jain N; Cho H; O'Connell M; Lee JK
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2005 Jul; 6():187. PubMed ID: 16042779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Comparison of methods for estimating the number of true null hypotheses in multiplicity testing.
    Hsueh HM; Chen JJ; Kodell RL
    J Biopharm Stat; 2003 Nov; 13(4):675-89. PubMed ID: 14584715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Adjusting the neuroimaging statistical inferences for nonstationarity.
    Salimi-Khorshidi G; Smith SM; Nichols TE
    Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv; 2009; 12(Pt 1):992-9. PubMed ID: 20426085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Control procedures and estimators of the false discovery rate and their application in low-dimensional settings: an empirical investigation.
    Brinster R; Köttgen A; Tayo BO; Schumacher M; Sekula P;
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2018 Mar; 19(1):78. PubMed ID: 29499647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. A computational framework for estimating statistical power and planning hypothesis-driven experiments involving one-dimensional biomechanical continua.
    Pataky TC; Robinson MA; Vanrenterghem J
    J Biomech; 2018 Jan; 66():159-164. PubMed ID: 29146283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Revisiting the genome-wide significance threshold for common variant GWAS.
    Chen Z; Boehnke M; Wen X; Mukherjee B
    G3 (Bethesda); 2021 Feb; 11(2):. PubMed ID: 33585870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Region-of-interest analyses of one-dimensional biomechanical trajectories: bridging 0D and 1D theory, augmenting statistical power.
    Pataky TC; Robinson MA; Vanrenterghem J
    PeerJ; 2016; 4():e2652. PubMed ID: 27833816
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Peak p-values and false discovery rate inference in neuroimaging.
    Schwartzman A; Telschow F
    Neuroimage; 2019 Aug; 197():402-413. PubMed ID: 31028923
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Topological false discovery rates for brain mapping based on signal height.
    Li J; Gahm JK; Shi Y; Toga AW
    Neuroimage; 2018 Feb; 167():478-487. PubMed ID: 27838286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. A new estimation of protein-level false discovery rate.
    Wu G; Wan X; Xu B
    BMC Genomics; 2018 Aug; 19(Suppl 6):567. PubMed ID: 30367581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. False discovery rate-controlled multiple testing for union null hypotheses: a knockoff-based approach.
    Dai R; Zheng C
    Biometrics; 2023 Dec; 79(4):3497-3509. PubMed ID: 36854821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Stratified false discovery control for large-scale hypothesis testing with application to genome-wide association studies.
    Sun L; Craiu RV; Paterson AD; Bull SB
    Genet Epidemiol; 2006 Sep; 30(6):519-30. PubMed ID: 16800000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Cluster mass inference via random field theory.
    Zhang H; Nichols TE; Johnson TD
    Neuroimage; 2009 Jan; 44(1):51-61. PubMed ID: 18805493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. An assessment of false discovery rates and statistical significance in label-free quantitative proteomics with combined filters.
    Li Q; Roxas BA
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2009 Feb; 10():43. PubMed ID: 19187558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Sources of variation in false discovery rate estimation include sample size, correlation, and inherent differences between groups.
    Zhang J; Coombes KR
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2012; 13 Suppl 13(Suppl 13):S1. PubMed ID: 23320794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.