These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

184 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31844657)

  • 1. Guessing right - whether and how medical students give incorrect reasons for their correct diagnoses.
    Braun LT; Borrmann KF; Lottspeich C; Heinrich DA; Kiesewetter J; Fischer MR; Schmidmaier R
    GMS J Med Educ; 2019; 36(6):Doc85. PubMed ID: 31844657
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. To think is good: querying an initial hypothesis reduces diagnostic error in medical students.
    Coderre S; Wright B; McLaughlin K
    Acad Med; 2010 Jul; 85(7):1125-9. PubMed ID: 20592507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Knowledge is not enough to solve the problems - The role of diagnostic knowledge in clinical reasoning activities.
    Kiesewetter J; Ebersbach R; Tsalas N; Holzer M; Schmidmaier R; Fischer MR
    BMC Med Educ; 2016 Nov; 16(1):303. PubMed ID: 27881121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Diagnostic errors by medical students: results of a prospective qualitative study.
    Braun LT; Zwaan L; Kiesewetter J; Fischer MR; Schmidmaier R
    BMC Med Educ; 2017 Nov; 17(1):191. PubMed ID: 29121903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Does providing the correct diagnosis as feedback after self-explanation improve medical students diagnostic performance?
    Chamberland M; Setrakian J; St-Onge C; Bergeron L; Mamede S; Schmidt HG
    BMC Med Educ; 2019 Jun; 19(1):194. PubMed ID: 31185971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Implementation of a Clinical Reasoning Course in the Internal Medicine trimester of the final year of undergraduate medical training and its effect on students' case presentation and differential diagnostic skills.
    Harendza S; Krenz I; Klinge A; Wendt U; Janneck M
    GMS J Med Educ; 2017; 34(5):Doc66. PubMed ID: 29226234
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Clinical reasoning: the relative contribution of identification, interpretation and hypothesis errors to misdiagnosis.
    Groves M; O'Rourke P; Alexander H
    Med Teach; 2003 Nov; 25(6):621-5. PubMed ID: 15369910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Scaffolding clinical reasoning of medical students with virtual patients: effects on diagnostic accuracy, efficiency, and errors.
    Braun LT; Borrmann KF; Lottspeich C; Heinrich DA; Kiesewetter J; Fischer MR; Schmidmaier R
    Diagnosis (Berl); 2019 Jun; 6(2):137-149. PubMed ID: 30772868
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Uncovering the relation between clinical reasoning and diagnostic accuracy - An analysis of learner's clinical reasoning processes in virtual patients.
    Hege I; Kononowicz AA; Kiesewetter J; Foster-Johnson L
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(10):e0204900. PubMed ID: 30286136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The IDEA Assessment Tool: Assessing the Reporting, Diagnostic Reasoning, and Decision-Making Skills Demonstrated in Medical Students' Hospital Admission Notes.
    Baker EA; Ledford CH; Fogg L; Way DP; Park YS
    Teach Learn Med; 2015; 27(2):163-73. PubMed ID: 25893938
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The relationship between time to diagnose and diagnostic accuracy among internal medicine residents: a randomized experiment.
    Staal J; Alsma J; Mamede S; Olson APJ; Prins-van Gilst G; Geerlings SE; Plesac M; Sundberg MA; Frens MA; Schmidt HG; Van den Broek WW; Zwaan L
    BMC Med Educ; 2021 Apr; 21(1):227. PubMed ID: 33882919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Medical knowledge and teamwork predict the quality of case summary statements as an indicator of clinical reasoning in undergraduate medical students.
    Fürstenberg S; Oubaid V; Berberat PO; Kadmon M; Harendza S
    GMS J Med Educ; 2019; 36(6):Doc83. PubMed ID: 31844655
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Exploring medical students' perceptions of individual and group-based clinical reasoning with virtual patients: a qualitative study.
    Gonullu I; Bayazit A; Erden S
    BMC Med Educ; 2024 Feb; 24(1):189. PubMed ID: 38403641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The association between quality of connections and diagnostic accuracy in student-generated concept maps for clinical reasoning education with virtual patients.
    Kononowicz AA; Torre D; Górski S; Nowakowski M; Hege I
    GMS J Med Educ; 2023; 40(5):Doc61. PubMed ID: 37881522
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Exploring the role of salient distracting clinical features in the emergence of diagnostic errors and the mechanisms through which reflection counteracts mistakes.
    Mamede S; Splinter TA; van Gog T; Rikers RM; Schmidt HG
    BMJ Qual Saf; 2012 Apr; 21(4):295-300. PubMed ID: 22389021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Fostering medical students' clinical reasoning by learning from errors in clinical case vignettes: effects and conditions of additional prompting procedures to foster self-explanations.
    Klein M; Otto B; Fischer MR; Stark R
    Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract; 2019 May; 24(2):331-351. PubMed ID: 30627833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Do extended matching multiple-choice questions measure clinical reasoning?
    Beullens J; Struyf E; Van Damme B
    Med Educ; 2005 Apr; 39(4):410-7. PubMed ID: 15813764
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. How case representations of medical students change during case processing - Results of a qualitative study.
    Braun LT; Lenzer B; Kiesewetter J; Fischer MR; Schmidmaier R
    GMS J Med Educ; 2018; 35(3):Doc41. PubMed ID: 30186951
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Bringing explicit insight into cognitive psychology features during clinical reasoning seminars: a prospective, controlled study.
    Nendaz MR; Gut AM; Louis-Simonet M; Perrier A; Vu NV
    Educ Health (Abingdon); 2011 Apr; 24(1):496. PubMed ID: 21710417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A mixed-methods exploration of cognitive dispositions to respond and clinical reasoning errors with multiple choice questions.
    Surry LT; Torre D; Trowbridge RL; Durning SJ
    BMC Med Educ; 2018 Nov; 18(1):277. PubMed ID: 30470223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.