395 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31844971)
1. Superior pathologic and clinical outcomes after minimally invasive rectal cancer resection, compared to open resection.
Lee GC; Bordeianou LG; Francone TD; Blaszkowsky LS; Goldstone RN; Ricciardi R; Kunitake H; Qadan M
Surg Endosc; 2020 Aug; 34(8):3435-3448. PubMed ID: 31844971
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Outcomes in rectal cancer patients undergoing laparoscopic or robotic low anterior resection compared to open: a propensity-matched analysis of the NCDB (2010-2015).
Chapman BC; Edgcomb M; Gleisner A; Vogel JD
Surg Endosc; 2020 Nov; 34(11):4754-4771. PubMed ID: 31728754
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The Impact of Conversion to Laparotomy in Rectal Cancer : A National Cancer Database Analysis of 57 574 Patients.
Parascandola SA; Hota S; Tampo MMT; Sparks AD; Obias V
Am Surg; 2020 Jul; 86(7):811-818. PubMed ID: 32683917
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Oncologic and Perioperative Outcomes of Laparoscopic, Open, and Robotic Approaches for Rectal Cancer Resection: A Multicenter, Propensity Score-Weighted Cohort Study.
Kethman WC; Harris AHS; Morris AM; Shelton A; Kirilcuk N; Kin C
Dis Colon Rectum; 2020 Jan; 63(1):46-52. PubMed ID: 31764247
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Minimally Invasive Surgery for Rectal Adenocarcinoma Shows Promising Outcomes Compared to Laparotomy, a National Cancer Database Observational Analysis.
Skancke M; Schoolfield C; Umapathi B; Amdur R; Brody F; Obias V
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A; 2019 Feb; 29(2):218-224. PubMed ID: 30431390
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Robotic versus laparoscopic rectal resection for sphincter-saving surgery: pathological and short-term outcomes in a single-center analysis of 130 consecutive patients.
Valverde A; Goasguen N; Oberlin O; Svrcek M; Fléjou JF; Sezeur A; Mosnier H; Houdart R; Lupinacci RM
Surg Endosc; 2017 Oct; 31(10):4085-4091. PubMed ID: 28271268
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A Comparison of Pathologic Outcomes of Open, Laparoscopic, and Robotic Resections for Rectal Cancer Using the ACS-NSQIP Proctectomy-Targeted Database: a Propensity Score Analysis.
Garfinkle R; Abou-Khalil M; Bhatnagar S; Wong-Chong N; Azoulay L; Morin N; Vasilevsky CA; Boutros M
J Gastrointest Surg; 2019 Feb; 23(2):348-356. PubMed ID: 30264386
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Long-Term Oncologic Outcomes of Minimally Invasive Proctectomy for Rectal Adenocarcinoma.
Merchea A; Ali SM; Kelley SR; Duchalais E; Alabbad JY; Dozois EJ; Larson DW
J Gastrointest Surg; 2018 Aug; 22(8):1412-1417. PubMed ID: 29594912
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Trends and outcomes of robotic surgery for gastrointestinal (GI) cancers in the USA: maintaining perioperative and oncologic safety.
Konstantinidis IT; Ituarte P; Woo Y; Warner SG; Melstrom K; Kim J; Singh G; Lee B; Fong Y; Melstrom LG
Surg Endosc; 2020 Nov; 34(11):4932-4942. PubMed ID: 31820161
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Minimally invasive versus open total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer: Long-term results from a case-matched study of 633 patients.
Cho MS; Kim CW; Baek SJ; Hur H; Min BS; Baik SH; Lee KY; Kim NK
Surgery; 2015 Jun; 157(6):1121-9. PubMed ID: 25737005
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Defining the Role of Minimally Invasive Proctectomy for Locally Advanced Rectal Adenocarcinoma.
Sujatha-Bhaskar S; Jafari MD; Gahagan JV; Inaba CS; Koh CY; Mills SD; Carmichael JC; Stamos MJ; Pigazzi A
Ann Surg; 2017 Oct; 266(4):574-581. PubMed ID: 28650357
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Total mesorectal excision for mid and low rectal cancer: Laparoscopic vs robotic surgery.
Feroci F; Vannucchi A; Bianchi PP; Cantafio S; Garzi A; Formisano G; Scatizzi M
World J Gastroenterol; 2016 Apr; 22(13):3602-10. PubMed ID: 27053852
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Open versus minimally invasive surgery for rectal cancer: a single-center cohort study on 237 consecutive patients.
Quero G; Rosa F; Ricci R; Fiorillo C; Giustiniani MC; Cina C; Menghi R; Doglietto GB; Alfieri S
Updates Surg; 2019 Sep; 71(3):493-504. PubMed ID: 30868546
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Minimally Invasive Versus Open Low Anterior Resection: Equivalent Survival in a National Analysis of 14,033 Patients With Rectal Cancer.
Sun Z; Kim J; Adam MA; Nussbaum DP; Speicher PJ; Mantyh CR; Migaly J
Ann Surg; 2016 Jun; 263(6):1152-8. PubMed ID: 26501702
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Outcomes of Open, Laparoscopic, and Robotic Abdominoperineal Resections in Patients With Rectal Cancer.
Moghadamyeghaneh Z; Phelan M; Smith BR; Stamos MJ
Dis Colon Rectum; 2015 Dec; 58(12):1123-9. PubMed ID: 26544808
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. National disparities in use of minimally invasive surgery for rectal cancer in older adults.
Simon HL; Reif de Paula T; Spigel ZA; Keller DS
J Am Geriatr Soc; 2022 Jan; 70(1):126-135. PubMed ID: 34559891
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Laparoscopic resection of rectal cancer results in higher lymph node yield and better short-term outcomes than open surgery: a large single-center comparative study.
Boutros M; Hippalgaonkar N; Silva E; Allende D; Wexner SD; Berho M
Dis Colon Rectum; 2013 Jun; 56(6):679-88. PubMed ID: 23652740
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Functional outcomes after laparoscopic versus robotic-assisted rectal resection: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Kowalewski KF; Seifert L; Ali S; Schmidt MW; Seide S; Haney C; Tapking C; Shamiyeh A; Kulu Y; Hackert T; Müller-Stich BP; Nickel F
Surg Endosc; 2021 Jan; 35(1):81-95. PubMed ID: 32025924
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The impact of surgical approach on short- and long-term outcomes after rectal cancer resection in elderly patients: a national cancer database propensity score matched comparison of robotic, laparoscopic, and open approaches.
Horsey ML; Parascandola SA; Sparks AD; Hota S; Ng M; Obias V
Surg Endosc; 2022 Feb; 36(2):1269-1277. PubMed ID: 33638109
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Insurance Status, Not Race, is Associated With Use of Minimally Invasive Surgical Approach for Rectal Cancer.
Turner M; Adam MA; Sun Z; Kim J; Ezekian B; Yerokun B; Mantyh C; Migaly J
Ann Surg; 2017 Apr; 265(4):774-781. PubMed ID: 27163956
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
