These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

183 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31845105)

  • 1. Crossmodal learning of target-context associations: When would tactile context predict visual search?
    Chen S; Shi Z; Zang X; Zhu X; Assumpção L; Müller HJ; Geyer T
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2020 May; 82(4):1682-1694. PubMed ID: 31845105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. When visual distractors predict tactile search: The temporal profile of cross-modal spatial learning.
    Chen S; Shi Z; Müller HJ; Geyer T
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2021 Sep; 47(9):1453-1470. PubMed ID: 33464111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Cross-modal contextual memory guides selective attention in visual-search tasks.
    Chen S; Shi Z; Zinchenko A; Müller HJ; Geyer T
    Psychophysiology; 2022 Jul; 59(7):e14025. PubMed ID: 35141899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Contextual cueing: implicit memory of tactile context facilitates tactile search.
    Assumpção L; Shi Z; Zang X; Müller HJ; Geyer T
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2015 May; 77(4):1212-22. PubMed ID: 25737258
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Within-hemifield posture changes affect tactile-visual exogenous spatial cueing without spatial precision, especially in the dark.
    Kennett S; Driver J
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2014 May; 76(4):1121-35. PubMed ID: 24470256
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Contextual cueing of tactile search is coded in an anatomical reference frame.
    Assumpção L; Shi Z; Zang X; Müller HJ; Geyer T
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2018 Apr; 44(4):566-577. PubMed ID: 29035073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Crossmodal attention between vision and touch in temporal order judgment task].
    Wada Y
    Shinrigaku Kenkyu; 2003 Dec; 74(5):420-7. PubMed ID: 15029758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Interactions of different body parts in peripersonal space: how vision of the foot influences tactile perception at the hand.
    Schicke T; Bauer F; Röder B
    Exp Brain Res; 2009 Feb; 192(4):703-15. PubMed ID: 18841353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. When far is near: ERP correlates of crossmodal spatial interactions between tactile and mirror-reflected visual stimuli.
    Sambo CF; Forster B
    Neurosci Lett; 2011 Aug; 500(1):10-5. PubMed ID: 21683122
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A neurocomputational analysis of visual bias on bimanual tactile spatial perception during a crossmodal exposure.
    Cuppini C; Magosso E; Monti M; Ursino M; Yau JM
    Front Neural Circuits; 2022; 16():933455. PubMed ID: 36439678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Multisensory Rather than Unisensory Representations Contribute to Statistical Context Learning in Tactile Search.
    Chen S; Geyer T; Zinchenko A; Müller HJ; Shi Z
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2022 Aug; 34(9):1702-1717. PubMed ID: 35704553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. On the inability to ignore touch when responding to vision in the crossmodal congruency task.
    Spence C; Walton M
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2005; 118(1-2):47-70. PubMed ID: 15627409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Multisensory visuo-tactile context learning enhances the guidance of unisensory visual search.
    Chen S; Shi Z; Müller HJ; Geyer T
    Sci Rep; 2021 May; 11(1):9439. PubMed ID: 33941832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Principles of tactile search over the body.
    Halfen EJ; Magnotti JF; Rahman MS; Yau JM
    J Neurophysiol; 2020 May; 123(5):1955-1968. PubMed ID: 32233886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Response interference in touch, vision, and crossmodally: beyond the spatial dimension.
    Mast F; Frings C; Spence C
    Exp Brain Res; 2014 Jul; 232(7):2325-36. PubMed ID: 24728130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effectiveness of auditory and tactile crossmodal cues in a dual-task visual and auditory scenario.
    Hopkins K; Kass SJ; Blalock LD; Brill JC
    Ergonomics; 2017 May; 60(5):692-700. PubMed ID: 27267493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Expected but omitted stimuli affect crossmodal interaction.
    Costantini M; Migliorati D; Donno B; Sirota M; Ferri F
    Cognition; 2018 Feb; 171():52-64. PubMed ID: 29107888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Influence of the body on crossmodal interference effects between tactile and two-dimensional visual stimuli.
    Igarashi Y; Kitagawa N; Ichihara S
    Exp Brain Res; 2010 Jul; 204(3):419-30. PubMed ID: 20577727
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The left-right reversed visual feedback of the hand affects multisensory interaction within peripersonal space.
    Mine D; Narumi T
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2024 Jan; 86(1):285-294. PubMed ID: 37759149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Adapting the Crossmodal Congruency Task for Measuring the Limits of Visual-Tactile Interactions Within and Between Groups.
    Poole D; Couth S; Gowen E; Warren PA; Poliakoff E
    Multisens Res; 2015; 28(3-4):227-44. PubMed ID: 26288897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.