BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

156 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31845816)

  • 1. Inter-fraction robustness of intensity-modulated proton therapy in the post-operative treatment of oropharyngeal and oral cavity squamous cell carcinomas.
    Hague C; Aznar M; Dong L; Fotouhi-Ghiam A; Lee LW; Li T; Lin A; Lowe M; Lukens JN; McPartlin A; O'Reilly S; Slevin N; Swisher-Mcclure S; Thomson D; Van Herk M; West C; Zou W; Teo BK
    Br J Radiol; 2020 Mar; 93(1107):20190638. PubMed ID: 31845816
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Superiority in Robustness of Multifield Optimization Over Single-Field Optimization for Pencil-Beam Proton Therapy for Oropharynx Carcinoma: An Enhanced Robustness Analysis.
    Stützer K; Lin A; Kirk M; Lin L
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2017 Nov; 99(3):738-749. PubMed ID: 29280468
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Quantification of plan robustness against different uncertainty sources for classical and anatomical robust optimized treatment plans in head and neck cancer proton therapy.
    Cubillos-Mesías M; Troost EGC; Lohaus F; Agolli L; Rehm M; Richter C; Stützer K
    Br J Radiol; 2020 Mar; 93(1107):20190573. PubMed ID: 31778315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Dose uncertainties in IMPT for oropharyngeal cancer in the presence of anatomical, range, and setup errors.
    Kraan AC; van de Water S; Teguh DN; Al-Mamgani A; Madden T; Kooy HM; Heijmen BJ; Hoogeman MS
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2013 Dec; 87(5):888-96. PubMed ID: 24351409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Multifield optimization intensity modulated proton therapy for head and neck tumors: a translation to practice.
    Frank SJ; Cox JD; Gillin M; Mohan R; Garden AS; Rosenthal DI; Gunn GB; Weber RS; Kies MS; Lewin JS; Munsell MF; Palmer MB; Sahoo N; Zhang X; Liu W; Zhu XR
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2014 Jul; 89(4):846-53. PubMed ID: 24867532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Feasibility of automated proton therapy plan adaptation for head and neck tumors using cone beam CT images.
    Kurz C; Nijhuis R; Reiner M; Ganswindt U; Thieke C; Belka C; Parodi K; Landry G
    Radiat Oncol; 2016 Apr; 11():64. PubMed ID: 27129305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Impact of robust treatment planning on single- and multi-field optimized plans for proton beam therapy of unilateral head and neck target volumes.
    Cubillos-Mesías M; Baumann M; Troost EGC; Lohaus F; Löck S; Richter C; Stützer K
    Radiat Oncol; 2017 Nov; 12(1):190. PubMed ID: 29183377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of organ-at-risk sparing and plan robustness for spot-scanning proton therapy and volumetric modulated arc photon therapy in head-and-neck cancer.
    Barten DL; Tol JP; Dahele M; Slotman BJ; Verbakel WF
    Med Phys; 2015 Nov; 42(11):6589-98. PubMed ID: 26520750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Monitoring dosimetric impact of weight loss with kilovoltage (kV) cone beam CT (CBCT) during parotid-sparing IMRT and concurrent chemotherapy.
    Ho KF; Marchant T; Moore C; Webster G; Rowbottom C; Penington H; Lee L; Yap B; Sykes A; Slevin N
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2012 Mar; 82(3):e375-82. PubMed ID: 22197229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Pre-treatment analysis of non-rigid variations can assist robust intensity-modulated proton therapy plan selection for head and neck patients.
    Zhang Y; Alshaikhi J; Amos RA; Tan W; Anaya VM; Pang Y; Royle G; Bär E
    Med Phys; 2022 Dec; 49(12):7683-7693. PubMed ID: 36083223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Dosimetric comparison of distal esophageal carcinoma plans for patients treated with small-spot intensity-modulated proton versus volumetric-modulated arc therapies.
    Liu C; Bhangoo RS; Sio TT; Yu NY; Shan J; Chiang JS; Ding JX; Rule WG; Korte S; Lara P; Ding X; Bues M; Hu Y; DeWees T; Ashman JB; Liu W
    J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2019 Jul; 20(7):15-27. PubMed ID: 31112371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Preliminary evaluation of multifield and single-field optimization for the treatment planning of spot-scanning proton therapy of head and neck cancer.
    Quan EM; Liu W; Wu R; Li Y; Frank SJ; Zhang X; Zhu XR; Mohan R
    Med Phys; 2013 Aug; 40(8):081709. PubMed ID: 23927306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Energy layer optimization strategies for intensity-modulated proton therapy of lung cancer patients.
    Jensen MF; Hoffmann L; Petersen JBB; Møller DS; Alber M
    Med Phys; 2018 Oct; 45(10):4355-4363. PubMed ID: 30129041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Evaluation of Robustness to Setup and Range Uncertainties for Head and Neck Patients Treated With Pencil Beam Scanning Proton Therapy.
    Malyapa R; Lowe M; Bolsi A; Lomax AJ; Weber DC; Albertini F
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2016 May; 95(1):154-162. PubMed ID: 27084638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Robust optimization in intensity-modulated proton therapy to account for anatomy changes in lung cancer patients.
    Li H; Zhang X; Park P; Liu W; Chang J; Liao Z; Frank S; Li Y; Poenisch F; Mohan R; Gillin M; Zhu R
    Radiother Oncol; 2015 Mar; 114(3):367-72. PubMed ID: 25708992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Generation and evaluation of anatomy-preserving virtual CT for online adaptive proton therapy.
    Kaushik S; Ödén J; Sharma DS; Fredriksson A; Toma-Dasu I
    Med Phys; 2024 Mar; 51(3):1536-1546. PubMed ID: 38230803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effectiveness of robust optimization in intensity-modulated proton therapy planning for head and neck cancers.
    Liu W; Frank SJ; Li X; Li Y; Park PC; Dong L; Ronald Zhu X; Mohan R
    Med Phys; 2013 May; 40(5):051711. PubMed ID: 23635259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Spot scanning proton arc therapy reduces toxicity in oropharyngeal cancer patients.
    de Jong BA; Battinelli C; Free J; Wagenaar D; Engwall E; Janssens G; Langendijk JA; Korevaar EW; Both S
    Med Phys; 2023 Mar; 50(3):1305-1317. PubMed ID: 36373893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Machine learning-based automatic proton therapy planning: Impact of post-processing and dose-mimicking in plan robustness.
    Borderias-Villarroel E; Huet Dastarac M; Barragán-Montero AM; Helander R; Holmstrom M; Geets X; Sterpin E
    Med Phys; 2023 Jul; 50(7):4480-4490. PubMed ID: 37029632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. An Analysis of Plan Robustness for Esophageal Tumors: Comparing Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy Plans and Spot Scanning Proton Planning.
    Warren S; Partridge M; Bolsi A; Lomax AJ; Hurt C; Crosby T; Hawkins MA
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2016 May; 95(1):199-207. PubMed ID: 27084641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.