456 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31845842)
1. Comparison of a Deep Learning Risk Score and Standard Mammographic Density Score for Breast Cancer Risk Prediction.
Dembrower K; Liu Y; Azizpour H; Eklund M; Smith K; Lindholm P; Strand F
Radiology; 2020 Feb; 294(2):265-272. PubMed ID: 31845842
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A Deep Learning Mammography-based Model for Improved Breast Cancer Risk Prediction.
Yala A; Lehman C; Schuster T; Portnoi T; Barzilay R
Radiology; 2019 Jul; 292(1):60-66. PubMed ID: 31063083
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Breast Cancer Risk and Mammographic Density Assessed with Semiautomated and Fully Automated Methods and BI-RADS.
Jeffers AM; Sieh W; Lipson JA; Rothstein JH; McGuire V; Whittemore AS; Rubin DL
Radiology; 2017 Feb; 282(2):348-355. PubMed ID: 27598536
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Evaluation of LIBRA Software for Fully Automated Mammographic Density Assessment in Breast Cancer Risk Prediction.
Gastounioti A; Kasi CD; Scott CG; Brandt KR; Jensen MR; Hruska CB; Wu FF; Norman AD; Conant EF; Winham SJ; Kerlikowske K; Kontos D; Vachon CM
Radiology; 2020 Jul; 296(1):24-31. PubMed ID: 32396041
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Predicting Breast Cancer by Applying Deep Learning to Linked Health Records and Mammograms.
Akselrod-Ballin A; Chorev M; Shoshan Y; Spiro A; Hazan A; Melamed R; Barkan E; Herzel E; Naor S; Karavani E; Koren G; Goldschmidt Y; Shalev V; Rosen-Zvi M; Guindy M
Radiology; 2019 Aug; 292(2):331-342. PubMed ID: 31210611
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Mammographic Breast Density Assessment Using Deep Learning: Clinical Implementation.
Lehman CD; Yala A; Schuster T; Dontchos B; Bahl M; Swanson K; Barzilay R
Radiology; 2019 Jan; 290(1):52-58. PubMed ID: 30325282
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Digital Mammography versus Breast Tomosynthesis: Impact of Breast Density on Diagnostic Performance in Population-based Screening.
Østerås BH; Martinsen ACT; Gullien R; Skaane P
Radiology; 2019 Oct; 293(1):60-68. PubMed ID: 31407968
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Deep Learning Predicts Interval and Screening-detected Cancer from Screening Mammograms: A Case-Case-Control Study in 6369 Women.
Zhu X; Wolfgruber TK; Leong L; Jensen M; Scott C; Winham S; Sadowski P; Vachon C; Kerlikowske K; Shepherd JA
Radiology; 2021 Dec; 301(3):550-558. PubMed ID: 34491131
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Identification of Women at High Risk of Breast Cancer Who Need Supplemental Screening.
Eriksson M; Czene K; Strand F; Zackrisson S; Lindholm P; Lång K; Förnvik D; Sartor H; Mavaddat N; Easton D; Hall P
Radiology; 2020 Nov; 297(2):327-333. PubMed ID: 32897160
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Predicting interval and screen-detected breast cancers from mammographic density defined by different brightness thresholds.
Nguyen TL; Aung YK; Li S; Trinh NH; Evans CF; Baglietto L; Krishnan K; Dite GS; Stone J; English DR; Song YM; Sung J; Jenkins MA; Southey MC; Giles GG; Hopper JL
Breast Cancer Res; 2018 Dec; 20(1):152. PubMed ID: 30545395
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The combined effect of mammographic texture and density on breast cancer risk: a cohort study.
Wanders JOP; van Gils CH; Karssemeijer N; Holland K; Kallenberg M; Peeters PHM; Nielsen M; Lillholm M
Breast Cancer Res; 2018 May; 20(1):36. PubMed ID: 29720220
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Assessment of a Four-View Mammographic Image Feature Based Fusion Model to Predict Near-Term Breast Cancer Risk.
Tan M; Pu J; Cheng S; Liu H; Zheng B
Ann Biomed Eng; 2015 Oct; 43(10):2416-28. PubMed ID: 25851469
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Performance of an Artificial Intelligence System for Breast Cancer Detection on Screening Mammograms from BreastScreen Norway.
Larsen M; Olstad CF; Lee CI; Hovda T; Hoff SR; Martiniussen MA; Mikalsen KØ; Lund-Hanssen H; Solli HS; Silberhorn M; Sulheim ÅØ; Auensen S; Nygård JF; Hofvind S
Radiol Artif Intell; 2024 May; 6(3):e230375. PubMed ID: 38597784
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Radiomic Phenotypes of Mammographic Parenchymal Complexity: Toward Augmenting Breast Density in Breast Cancer Risk Assessment.
Kontos D; Winham SJ; Oustimov A; Pantalone L; Hsieh MK; Gastounioti A; Whaley DH; Hruska CB; Kerlikowske K; Brandt K; Conant EF; Vachon CM
Radiology; 2019 Jan; 290(1):41-49. PubMed ID: 30375931
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Breast Cancer Risk Associations with Digital Mammographic Density by Pixel Brightness Threshold and Mammographic System.
Nguyen TL; Choi YH; Aung YK; Evans CF; Trinh NH; Li S; Dite GS; Kim MS; Brennan PC; Jenkins MA; Sung J; Song YM; Hopper JL
Radiology; 2018 Feb; 286(2):433-442. PubMed ID: 29040039
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Deep learning networks find unique mammographic differences in previous negative mammograms between interval and screen-detected cancers: a case-case study.
Hinton B; Ma L; Mahmoudzadeh AP; Malkov S; Fan B; Greenwood H; Joe B; Lee V; Kerlikowske K; Shepherd J
Cancer Imaging; 2019 Jun; 19(1):41. PubMed ID: 31228956
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Deep learning modeling using normal mammograms for predicting breast cancer risk.
Arefan D; Mohamed AA; Berg WA; Zuley ML; Sumkin JH; Wu S
Med Phys; 2020 Jan; 47(1):110-118. PubMed ID: 31667873
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Computer-aided assessment of breast density: comparison of supervised deep learning and feature-based statistical learning.
Li S; Wei J; Chan HP; Helvie MA; Roubidoux MA; Lu Y; Zhou C; Hadjiiski LM; Samala RK
Phys Med Biol; 2018 Jan; 63(2):025005. PubMed ID: 29210358
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Reducing False-Positive Screening MRI Rate in Women with Extremely Dense Breasts Using Prediction Models Based on Data from the DENSE Trial.
den Dekker BM; Bakker MF; de Lange SV; Veldhuis WB; van Diest PJ; Duvivier KM; Lobbes MBI; Loo CE; Mann RM; Monninkhof EM; Veltman J; Pijnappel RM; van Gils CH;
Radiology; 2021 Nov; 301(2):283-292. PubMed ID: 34402665
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Deep-Learning-Based Semantic Labeling for 2D Mammography and Comparison of Complexity for Machine Learning Tasks.
Yi PH; Lin A; Wei J; Yu AC; Sair HI; Hui FK; Hager GD; Harvey SC
J Digit Imaging; 2019 Aug; 32(4):565-570. PubMed ID: 31197559
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
