These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
474 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31846976)
1. Cochlear Implantation with the CI512 and CI532 Precurved Electrode Arrays: One-Year Speech Recognition and Intraoperative Thresholds of Electrically Evoked Compound Action Potentials. Videhult Pierre P; Eklöf M; Smeds H; Asp F Audiol Neurootol; 2019; 24(6):299-308. PubMed ID: 31846976 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Objective, audiological and quality of life measures with the CI532 slim modiolar electrode. Hey M; Wesarg T; Mewes A; Helbig S; Hornung J; Lenarz T; Briggs R; Marx M; Ramos A; Stöver T; Escudé B; James CJ; Aschendorff A Cochlear Implants Int; 2019 Mar; 20(2):80-90. PubMed ID: 30465637 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Effect of Proximity to the Modiolus for the Cochlear CI532 Slim Modiolar Electrode Array on Evoked Compound Action Potentials and Programming Levels. Greisiger R; Heldahl MG; Myhrum M; Sørensen TM; Dammerud JJ; Rasmussen K; Korslund H; Bunne M; Jablonski GE Audiol Neurootol; 2022; 27(5):397-405. PubMed ID: 35504247 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Threshold dynamics of the auditory nerve electrically evoked compound action potential in implanted children]. Kechiyan DK; Bakhshinyan VV; Tavartkiladze GA Vestn Otorinolaringol; 2020; 85(6):17-22. PubMed ID: 33474911 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Intraoperative Electrically Evoked Compound Action Potential Growth and Maximum Amplitudes in Hearing Preservation Cochlear Implant Recipients. Mussoi BS; Woodson E; Sydlowski S Otol Neurotol; 2023 Apr; 44(4):e216-e222. PubMed ID: 36946363 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Electrically evoked amplitude modulation following response in cochlear implant candidates: comparison with auditory nerve response telemetry, subjective electrical stimulation, and speech perception. Hirschfelder A; Gräbel S; Olze H Otol Neurotol; 2012 Aug; 33(6):968-75. PubMed ID: 22772009 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Assessment of cochlear trauma and telemetry measures after cochlear implantation: A comparative study between Nucleus Cuda D; Murri A Audiol Res; 2019 May; 9(1):223. PubMed ID: 31402972 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. ART and AutoART ECAP measurements and cochlear nerve anatomy as predictors in adult cochlear implant recipients. Schrank L; Nachtigäller P; Müller J; Hempel JM; Canis M; Spiegel JL; Rader T Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2024 Jul; 281(7):3461-3473. PubMed ID: 38219245 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Electrically evoked compound action potential (ECAP) in cochlear implant children: Changes in auditory nerve response in first year of cochlear implant use. Telmesani LM; Said NM Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2016 Mar; 82():28-33. PubMed ID: 26857311 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Toward a method of achieving balanced stimulation of bilateral auditory nerves: Evidence from children receiving matched and unmatched bilateral cochlear implants simultaneously. Tsai P; Wisener N; Papsin BC; Cushing SL; Gordon KA Hear Res; 2022 Mar; 416():108445. PubMed ID: 35104716 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of electrically evoked compound action potential thresholds and loudness estimates for the stimuli used to program the Advanced Bionics cochlear implant. Jeon EK; Brown CJ; Etler CP; O'Brien S; Chiou LK; Abbas PJ J Am Acad Audiol; 2010 Jan; 21(1):16-27. PubMed ID: 20085196 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Toward a battery of behavioral and objective measures to achieve optimal cochlear implant stimulation levels in children. Gordon KA; Papsin BC; Harrison RV Ear Hear; 2004 Oct; 25(5):447-63. PubMed ID: 15599192 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Packing of the cochleostomy site affects auditory nerve response thresholds in precurved off-stylet cochlear implants. Gordin A; Papsin B; Gordon K Otol Neurotol; 2010 Feb; 31(2):204-9. PubMed ID: 20101160 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A new approach for the determination of ECAP thresholds. Hoth S; Spitzer P; Praetorius M Cochlear Implants Int; 2018 Mar; 19(2):104-114. PubMed ID: 29161976 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Association Between Intracochlear Electrode Design and Electrically-Evoked Compound Action Potential Measures in Cochlear Implant Users. Kim JS; Hong SH; Moon IJ Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2024 Sep; 171(3):849-857. PubMed ID: 38774957 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Electric compound action potentials (ECAPs) and impedances in an open and closed operative site during cochlear implantation. Christov F; Gluth MB; Lahti SJ; Ludwig S; Hans S; Holtmann LC; Lang S; Arweiler-Harbeck D Cochlear Implants Int; 2019 Jan; 20(1):23-30. PubMed ID: 30350745 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Speech Perception Performance in Cochlear Implant Recipients Correlates to the Number and Synchrony of Excited Auditory Nerve Fibers Derived From Electrically Evoked Compound Action Potentials. Dong Y; Briaire JJ; Stronks HC; Frijns JHM Ear Hear; 2023 Mar-Apr 01; 44(2):276-286. PubMed ID: 36253905 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Determining electrically evoked compound action potential thresholds: a comparison of computer versus human analysis methods. Glassman EK; Hughes ML Ear Hear; 2013; 34(1):96-109. PubMed ID: 22885406 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Characteristics of responsiveness of cochlear nerve to electrical stimulation in patients with cochlear nerve deficiency]. Chao XH; Luo JF; Wang RJ; Fan ZM; Wang HB; Xu L Zhonghua Er Bi Yan Hou Tou Jing Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2023 Jul; 58(7):657-665. PubMed ID: 37455110 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]