463 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31846976)
1. Cochlear Implantation with the CI512 and CI532 Precurved Electrode Arrays: One-Year Speech Recognition and Intraoperative Thresholds of Electrically Evoked Compound Action Potentials.
Videhult Pierre P; Eklöf M; Smeds H; Asp F
Audiol Neurootol; 2019; 24(6):299-308. PubMed ID: 31846976
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Objective, audiological and quality of life measures with the CI532 slim modiolar electrode.
Hey M; Wesarg T; Mewes A; Helbig S; Hornung J; Lenarz T; Briggs R; Marx M; Ramos A; Stöver T; Escudé B; James CJ; Aschendorff A
Cochlear Implants Int; 2019 Mar; 20(2):80-90. PubMed ID: 30465637
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Effect of Proximity to the Modiolus for the Cochlear CI532 Slim Modiolar Electrode Array on Evoked Compound Action Potentials and Programming Levels.
Greisiger R; Heldahl MG; Myhrum M; Sørensen TM; Dammerud JJ; Rasmussen K; Korslund H; Bunne M; Jablonski GE
Audiol Neurootol; 2022; 27(5):397-405. PubMed ID: 35504247
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [Threshold dynamics of the auditory nerve electrically evoked compound action potential in implanted children].
Kechiyan DK; Bakhshinyan VV; Tavartkiladze GA
Vestn Otorinolaringol; 2020; 85(6):17-22. PubMed ID: 33474911
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Intraoperative Electrically Evoked Compound Action Potential Growth and Maximum Amplitudes in Hearing Preservation Cochlear Implant Recipients.
Mussoi BS; Woodson E; Sydlowski S
Otol Neurotol; 2023 Apr; 44(4):e216-e222. PubMed ID: 36946363
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Electrically evoked amplitude modulation following response in cochlear implant candidates: comparison with auditory nerve response telemetry, subjective electrical stimulation, and speech perception.
Hirschfelder A; Gräbel S; Olze H
Otol Neurotol; 2012 Aug; 33(6):968-75. PubMed ID: 22772009
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Assessment of cochlear trauma and telemetry measures after cochlear implantation: A comparative study between Nucleus
Cuda D; Murri A
Audiol Res; 2019 May; 9(1):223. PubMed ID: 31402972
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. ART and AutoART ECAP measurements and cochlear nerve anatomy as predictors in adult cochlear implant recipients.
Schrank L; Nachtigäller P; Müller J; Hempel JM; Canis M; Spiegel JL; Rader T
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2024 Jul; 281(7):3461-3473. PubMed ID: 38219245
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Electrically evoked compound action potential (ECAP) in cochlear implant children: Changes in auditory nerve response in first year of cochlear implant use.
Telmesani LM; Said NM
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2016 Mar; 82():28-33. PubMed ID: 26857311
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Toward a method of achieving balanced stimulation of bilateral auditory nerves: Evidence from children receiving matched and unmatched bilateral cochlear implants simultaneously.
Tsai P; Wisener N; Papsin BC; Cushing SL; Gordon KA
Hear Res; 2022 Mar; 416():108445. PubMed ID: 35104716
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of electrically evoked compound action potential thresholds and loudness estimates for the stimuli used to program the Advanced Bionics cochlear implant.
Jeon EK; Brown CJ; Etler CP; O'Brien S; Chiou LK; Abbas PJ
J Am Acad Audiol; 2010 Jan; 21(1):16-27. PubMed ID: 20085196
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Toward a battery of behavioral and objective measures to achieve optimal cochlear implant stimulation levels in children.
Gordon KA; Papsin BC; Harrison RV
Ear Hear; 2004 Oct; 25(5):447-63. PubMed ID: 15599192
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Packing of the cochleostomy site affects auditory nerve response thresholds in precurved off-stylet cochlear implants.
Gordin A; Papsin B; Gordon K
Otol Neurotol; 2010 Feb; 31(2):204-9. PubMed ID: 20101160
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A new approach for the determination of ECAP thresholds.
Hoth S; Spitzer P; Praetorius M
Cochlear Implants Int; 2018 Mar; 19(2):104-114. PubMed ID: 29161976
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Electric compound action potentials (ECAPs) and impedances in an open and closed operative site during cochlear implantation.
Christov F; Gluth MB; Lahti SJ; Ludwig S; Hans S; Holtmann LC; Lang S; Arweiler-Harbeck D
Cochlear Implants Int; 2019 Jan; 20(1):23-30. PubMed ID: 30350745
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Speech Perception Performance in Cochlear Implant Recipients Correlates to the Number and Synchrony of Excited Auditory Nerve Fibers Derived From Electrically Evoked Compound Action Potentials.
Dong Y; Briaire JJ; Stronks HC; Frijns JHM
Ear Hear; 2023 Mar-Apr 01; 44(2):276-286. PubMed ID: 36253905
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Determining electrically evoked compound action potential thresholds: a comparison of computer versus human analysis methods.
Glassman EK; Hughes ML
Ear Hear; 2013; 34(1):96-109. PubMed ID: 22885406
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Characteristics of responsiveness of cochlear nerve to electrical stimulation in patients with cochlear nerve deficiency].
Chao XH; Luo JF; Wang RJ; Fan ZM; Wang HB; Xu L
Zhonghua Er Bi Yan Hou Tou Jing Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2023 Jul; 58(7):657-665. PubMed ID: 37455110
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Using evoked compound action potentials to assess activation of electrodes and predict C-levels in the Tempo+ cochlear implant speech processor.
Alvarez I; de la Torre A; Sainz M; Roldán C; Schoesser H; Spitzer P
Ear Hear; 2010 Feb; 31(1):134-45. PubMed ID: 19838116
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Intraoperative findings on ECAP-measurement: normal or special case?
Müller A; Hocke T; Mir-Salim P
Int J Audiol; 2015 Apr; 54(4):257-64. PubMed ID: 25421058
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
