401 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31848013)
1. How do drivers avoid collisions? A driving simulator-based study.
Li X; Rakotonirainy A; Yan X
J Safety Res; 2019 Sep; 70():89-96. PubMed ID: 31848013
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Practice makes better - Learning effects of driving with a multi-stage collision warning.
Winkler S; Kazazi J; Vollrath M
Accid Anal Prev; 2018 Aug; 117():398-409. PubMed ID: 29477461
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A rear-end collision risk assessment model based on drivers' collision avoidance process under influences of cell phone use and gender-A driving simulator based study.
Li X; Yan X; Wu J; Radwan E; Zhang Y
Accid Anal Prev; 2016 Dec; 97():1-18. PubMed ID: 27565040
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. An improved automated braking system for rear-end collisions: A study based on a driving simulator experiment.
Hang J; Yan X; Li X; Duan K; Yang J; Xue Q
J Safety Res; 2022 Feb; 80():416-427. PubMed ID: 35249623
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. How does intersection field of view influence driving safety in an emergent situation?
Yan X; Zhang X; Xue Q
Accid Anal Prev; 2018 Oct; 119():162-175. PubMed ID: 30036817
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Analysis of car driver responses to avoid car-to-cyclist perpendicular collisions based on drive recorder data and driving simulator experiments.
Zhao Y; Miyahara T; Mizuno K; Ito D; Han Y
Accid Anal Prev; 2021 Feb; 150():105862. PubMed ID: 33276185
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. An exploratory study of drivers' EEG response during emergent collision avoidance.
Li X; Yang L; Yan X
J Safety Res; 2022 Sep; 82():241-250. PubMed ID: 36031251
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Behavioural accident avoidance science: understanding response in collision incipient conditions.
Hancock PA; de Ridder SN
Ergonomics; 2003 Oct; 46(12):1111-35. PubMed ID: 12933076
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Brake reactions of distracted drivers to pedestrian Forward Collision Warning systems.
Lubbe N
J Safety Res; 2017 Jun; 61():23-32. PubMed ID: 28454868
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. How do drivers overtake pedestrians? Evidence from field test and naturalistic driving data.
Rasch A; Panero G; Boda CN; Dozza M
Accid Anal Prev; 2020 May; 139():105494. PubMed ID: 32203729
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Collision warning timing, driver distraction, and driver response to imminent rear-end collisions in a high-fidelity driving simulator.
Lee JD; McGehee DV; Brown TL; Reyes ML
Hum Factors; 2002; 44(2):314-34. PubMed ID: 12452276
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Drivers' eye movements as a function of collision avoidance warning conditions in red light running scenarios.
Zhang Y; Yan X; Li X; Xue Q
Accid Anal Prev; 2016 Nov; 96():185-197. PubMed ID: 27543896
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Age and gender differences in time to collision at braking from the 100-Car Naturalistic Driving Study.
Montgomery J; Kusano KD; Gabler HC
Traffic Inj Prev; 2014; 15 Suppl 1():S15-20. PubMed ID: 25307380
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Creating pedestrian crash scenarios in a driving simulator environment.
Chrysler ST; Ahmad O; Schwarz CW
Traffic Inj Prev; 2015; 16 Suppl 1():S12-7. PubMed ID: 26027964
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Towards an assistance strategy that reduces unnecessary collision alarms: An examination of the driver's perceived need for assistance.
Kaß C; Schmidt GJ; Kunde W
J Exp Psychol Appl; 2019 Jun; 25(2):291-302. PubMed ID: 30035557
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Does assisted driving behavior lead to safety-critical encounters with unequipped vehicles' drivers?
Preuk K; Stemmler E; Schießl C; Jipp M
Accid Anal Prev; 2016 Oct; 95(Pt A):149-56. PubMed ID: 27442594
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Situational influences on response time and maneuver choice: Development of time-critical scenarios.
Powelleit M; Vollrath M
Accid Anal Prev; 2019 Jan; 122():48-62. PubMed ID: 30308330
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Young drivers' perception of adult and child pedestrians in potential street-crossing situations.
Ābele L; Haustein S; Møller M
Accid Anal Prev; 2018 Sep; 118():263-268. PubMed ID: 29625692
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Effectiveness and driver acceptance of a semi-autonomous forward obstacle collision avoidance system.
Itoh M; Horikome T; Inagaki T
Appl Ergon; 2013 Sep; 44(5):756-63. PubMed ID: 23453775
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Analysis of effects of driver's evasive action time on rear-end collision risk using a driving simulator.
Shah D; Lee C
J Safety Res; 2021 Sep; 78():242-250. PubMed ID: 34399920
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
