These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

404 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31848013)

  • 21. How to warn drivers in various safety-critical situations - Different strategies, different reactions.
    Winkler S; Kazazi J; Vollrath M
    Accid Anal Prev; 2018 Aug; 117():410-426. PubMed ID: 29703596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Using retro-reflective cloth to enhance drivers' judgment of pedestrian walking direction at night-time.
    Black AA; Bui V; Henry E; Ho K; Pham D; Tran T; Wood JM
    J Safety Res; 2021 Jun; 77():196-201. PubMed ID: 34092309
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. In-vehicle warnings for work zone and related rear-end collisions: A driving simulator experiment.
    Hang J; Yan X; Li X; Duan K
    Accid Anal Prev; 2022 Sep; 174():106768. PubMed ID: 35820314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Driving errors that predict simulated rear-end collisions in drivers with multiple sclerosis.
    Krasniuk S; Classen S; Morrow SA
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2021; 22(3):212-217. PubMed ID: 33688770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Modelling braking behaviour and accident probability of drivers under increasing time pressure conditions.
    Pawar NM; Khanuja RK; Choudhary P; Velaga NR
    Accid Anal Prev; 2020 Mar; 136():105401. PubMed ID: 31884236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Using perceptual cues for brake response to a lead vehicle: Comparing threshold and accumulator models of visual looming.
    Xue Q; Markkula G; Yan X; Merat N
    Accid Anal Prev; 2018 Sep; 118():114-124. PubMed ID: 29929099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Forward collision warning based on a driver model to increase drivers' acceptance.
    Puente Guillen P; Gohl I
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2019; 20(sup1):S21-S26. PubMed ID: 31381428
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Modelling brake transition time of young alcohol-impaired drivers using hazard-based duration models.
    Yadav AK; Velaga NR
    Accid Anal Prev; 2021 Jul; 157():106169. PubMed ID: 33965845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Population distributions of time to collision at brake application during car following from naturalistic driving data.
    Kusano KD; Chen R; Montgomery J; Gabler HC
    J Safety Res; 2015 Sep; 54():95-104. PubMed ID: 26403908
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Driving with a partially autonomous forward collision warning system: how do drivers react?
    Muhrer E; Reinprecht K; Vollrath M
    Hum Factors; 2012 Oct; 54(5):698-708. PubMed ID: 23156616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Effects of driver compensatory behaviour on risks of critical pedestrian collisions under simulated visual field defects.
    Lee J; Itoh M
    PLoS One; 2020; 15(4):e0231130. PubMed ID: 32271822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Effectiveness of Lateral Auditory Collision Warnings: Should Warnings Be Toward Danger or Toward Safety?
    Chen J; Šabić E; Mishler S; Parker C; Yamaguchi M
    Hum Factors; 2022 Mar; 64(2):418-435. PubMed ID: 32779474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Driver braking behavior analysis to improve autonomous emergency braking systems in typical Chinese vehicle-bicycle conflicts.
    Duan J; Li R; Hou L; Wang W; Li G; Li SE; Cheng B; Gao H
    Accid Anal Prev; 2017 Nov; 108():74-82. PubMed ID: 28858775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. What happens when drivers of automated vehicles take over control in critical brake situations?
    Roche F; Thüring M; Trukenbrod AK
    Accid Anal Prev; 2020 Sep; 144():105588. PubMed ID: 32531374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Pedestrian crossing situations: quantification of comfort boundaries to guide intervention timing.
    Lubbe N; Rosén E
    Accid Anal Prev; 2014 Oct; 71():261-6. PubMed ID: 24956130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Assessing the effectiveness of "intuitive" vibrotactile warning signals in preventing front-to-rear-end collisions in a driving simulator.
    Ho C; Reed N; Spence C
    Accid Anal Prev; 2006 Sep; 38(5):988-96. PubMed ID: 16697344
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Influence of age and proximity warning devices on collision avoidance in simulated driving.
    Kramer AF; Cassavaugh N; Horrey WJ; Becic E; Mayhugh JL
    Hum Factors; 2007 Oct; 49(5):935-49. PubMed ID: 17915608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Effects of experience and electronic stability control on low friction collision avoidance in a truck driving simulator.
    Markkula G; Benderius O; Wolff K; Wahde M
    Accid Anal Prev; 2013 Jan; 50():1266-77. PubMed ID: 23122327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Changes in Drivers' Visual Performance during the Collision Avoidance Process as a Function of Different Field of Views at Intersections.
    Yan X; Zhang X; Zhang Y; Li X; Yang Z
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(10):e0164101. PubMed ID: 27716824
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. The impact of the connected environment on driving behavior and safety: A driving simulator study.
    Ali Y; Sharma A; Haque MM; Zheng Z; Saifuzzaman M
    Accid Anal Prev; 2020 Sep; 144():105643. PubMed ID: 32593781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 21.