These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

298 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31848662)

  • 1. Transvaginal uterosacral ligament hysteropexy versus hysterectomy plus uterosacral ligament suspension: a matched cohort study.
    Milani R; Manodoro S; Cola A; Bellante N; Palmieri S; Frigerio M
    Int Urogynecol J; 2020 Sep; 31(9):1867-1872. PubMed ID: 31848662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Laparoscopic Uterosacral Ligament Hysteropexy vs Total Vaginal Hysterectomy with Uterosacral Ligament Suspension for Anterior and Apical Prolapse: Surgical Outcome and Patient Satisfaction.
    Haj-Yahya R; Chill HH; Levin G; Reuveni-Salzman A; Shveiky D
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2020 Jan; 27(1):88-93. PubMed ID: 30802607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Characteristics associated with composite surgical failure over 5 years of women in a randomized trial of sacrospinous hysteropexy with graft vs vaginal hysterectomy with uterosacral ligament suspension.
    Richter HE; Sridhar A; Nager CW; Komesu YM; Harvie HS; Zyczynski HM; Rardin C; Visco A; Mazloomdoost D; Thomas S;
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2023 Jan; 228(1):63.e1-63.e16. PubMed ID: 35931131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Sacrospinous hysteropexy versus vaginal hysterectomy with uterosacral ligament suspension in women with uterine prolapse stage 2 or higher: observational follow-up of a multicentre randomised trial.
    Schulten SFM; Detollenaere RJ; Stekelenburg J; IntHout J; Kluivers KB; van Eijndhoven HWF
    BMJ; 2019 Sep; 366():l5149. PubMed ID: 31506252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effect of Vaginal Mesh Hysteropexy vs Vaginal Hysterectomy With Uterosacral Ligament Suspension on Treatment Failure in Women With Uterovaginal Prolapse: A Randomized Clinical Trial.
    Nager CW; Visco AG; Richter HE; Rardin CR; Rogers RG; Harvie HS; Zyczynski HM; Paraiso MFR; Mazloomdoost D; Grey S; Sridhar A; Wallace D;
    JAMA; 2019 Sep; 322(11):1054-1065. PubMed ID: 31529008
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. High Uterosacral Ligaments Suspension for Post-Hysterectomy Vaginal Vault Prolapse Repair.
    Barba M; Cola A; Melocchi T; De Vicari D; Costa C; Volontè S; Sandullo L; Frigerio M
    Medicina (Kaunas); 2024 Feb; 60(2):. PubMed ID: 38399607
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Risk factors for pelvic organ prolapse recurrence after sacrospinous hysteropexy or vaginal hysterectomy with uterosacral ligament suspension.
    Schulten SF; Detollenaere RJ; IntHout J; Kluivers KB; Van Eijndhoven HW
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2022 Aug; 227(2):252.e1-252.e9. PubMed ID: 35439530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Transvaginal uterosacral ligament hysteropexy: a retrospective feasibility study.
    Milani R; Frigerio M; Manodoro S; Cola A; Spelzini F
    Int Urogynecol J; 2017 Jan; 28(1):73-76. PubMed ID: 27193162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Defining mechanisms of recurrence following apical prolapse repair based on imaging criteria.
    Bowen ST; Moalli PA; Abramowitch SD; Lockhart ME; Weidner AC; Ferrando CA; Nager CW; Richter HE; Rardin CR; Komesu YM; Harvie HS; Mazloomdoost D; Sridhar A; Gantz MG;
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2021 Nov; 225(5):506.e1-506.e28. PubMed ID: 34087229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Sacrospinous hysteropexy versus vaginal hysterectomy with suspension of the uterosacral ligaments in women with uterine prolapse stage 2 or higher: multicentre randomised non-inferiority trial.
    Detollenaere RJ; den Boon J; Stekelenburg J; IntHout J; Vierhout ME; Kluivers KB; van Eijndhoven HW
    BMJ; 2015 Jul; 351():h3717. PubMed ID: 26206451
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The effect of hysteropreservation versus hysterectomy on the outcome of laparoscopic uterosacral suspension in pelvic organ prolapse surgery.
    Mao M; Fu H; Wang Q; Bai J; Zhang Y; Guo R
    Maturitas; 2023 Apr; 170():58-63. PubMed ID: 36773501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effect of sacrospinous hysteropexy with graft vs vaginal hysterectomy with uterosacral ligament suspension on treatment failure in women with uterovaginal prolapse: 5-year results of a randomized clinical trial.
    Nager CW; Visco AG; Richter HE; Rardin CR; Komesu Y; Harvie HS; Zyczynski HM; Paraiso MFR; Mazloomdoost D; Sridhar A; Thomas S;
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2021 Aug; 225(2):153.e1-153.e31. PubMed ID: 33716071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Outcomes of uterosacral ligaments suspension for uterovaginal prolapse native-tissue repair: Over 1000-patient single-center study.
    Barba M; Cola A; Costa C; De Vicari D; Amatucci N; Melocchi T; Frigerio M
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2024 Oct; 301():206-209. PubMed ID: 39154516
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Vaginal hysteropexy compared with vaginal hysterectomy with apical suspension for the treatment of pelvic organ prolapse: A 5-year cost-effectiveness Markov model.
    Wallace SL; Syan R; Lee K; Sokol ER
    BJOG; 2024 Feb; 131(3):362-371. PubMed ID: 37667669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The Impact of Sacrospinous Hysteropexy and Vaginal Hysterectomy With Suspension of the Uterosacral Ligaments on Sexual Function in Women With Uterine Prolapse: A Secondary Analysis of a Randomized Comparative Study.
    Detollenaere RJ; Kreuwel IA; Dijkstra JR; Kluivers KB; van Eijndhoven HW
    J Sex Med; 2016 Feb; 13(2):213-9. PubMed ID: 26805940
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Long-term outcome of native tissue reconstructive vaginal surgery for advanced pelvic organ prolapse at 86 months: Hysterectomy versus hysteropexy.
    Lo TS; Pue LB; Hung TH; Wu PY; Tan YL
    J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2015 Jul; 41(7):1099-107. PubMed ID: 25808989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Vaginal Colposuspension Using the Uphold Lite Mesh System versus Transvaginal Hysterectomy with Uterosacral Ligament Suspension for Treatment of Apical Prolapse: A Comparative Study.
    Chill HH; Navon I; Reuveni-Salzman A; Cohen A; Dick A; Shveiky D
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2021 Oct; 28(10):1759-1764. PubMed ID: 33713835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Uterine preservation vs hysterectomy in pelvic organ prolapse surgery: a systematic review with meta-analysis and clinical practice guidelines.
    Meriwether KV; Antosh DD; Olivera CK; Kim-Fine S; Balk EM; Murphy M; Grimes CL; Sleemi A; Singh R; Dieter AA; Crisp CC; Rahn DD
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2018 Aug; 219(2):129-146.e2. PubMed ID: 29353031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Transvaginal Natural Orifice Transluminal Endoscopic Uterosacral Ligament Hysteropexy: An Innovative Approach for Treatment of Uterine Prolapse.
    Lowenstein L; Ben-David C; Mick I; Levi G; Matanes E; Mor O
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2021 Nov; 28(11):1818-1819. PubMed ID: 34171475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Transvaginal uterosacral ligament hysteropexy: a video tutorial.
    Milani R; Frigerio M; Spelzini F; Manodoro S
    Int Urogynecol J; 2017 May; 28(5):789-791. PubMed ID: 27942792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.