These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

139 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31849535)

  • 1. Risk Prediction of Dyslipidemia for Chinese Han Adults Using Random Forest Survival Model.
    Zhang X; Tang F; Ji J; Han W; Lu P
    Clin Epidemiol; 2019; 11():1047-1055. PubMed ID: 31849535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Which model is better in predicting the survival of laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma?: Comparison of the random survival forest based on machine learning algorithms to Cox regression: analyses based on SEER database.
    Sun H; Wu S; Li S; Jiang X
    Medicine (Baltimore); 2023 Mar; 102(10):e33144. PubMed ID: 36897699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A Comparison Study of Machine Learning (Random Survival Forest) and Classic Statistic (Cox Proportional Hazards) for Predicting Progression in High-Grade Glioma after Proton and Carbon Ion Radiotherapy.
    Qiu X; Gao J; Yang J; Hu J; Hu W; Kong L; Lu JJ
    Front Oncol; 2020; 10():551420. PubMed ID: 33194609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Individual risk prediction: Comparing random forests with Cox proportional-hazards model by a simulation study.
    Baralou V; Kalpourtzi N; Touloumi G
    Biom J; 2023 Aug; 65(6):e2100380. PubMed ID: 36169048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Development and visualization of a risk prediction model for metabolic syndrome: a longitudinal cohort study based on health check-up data in China.
    Liu W; Tang X; Cui T; Zhao H; Song G
    Front Nutr; 2023; 10():1286654. PubMed ID: 38075230
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Incidence and Simple Prediction Model of Hyperuricemia for Urban Han Chinese Adults: A Prospective Cohort Study.
    Cao J; Wang C; Zhang G; Ji X; Liu Y; Sun X; Yuan Z; Jiang Z; Xue F
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2017 Jan; 14(1):. PubMed ID: 28085072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Machine learning-based prediction of 1-year mortality for acute coronary syndrome
    Hadanny A; Shouval R; Wu J; Gale CP; Unger R; Zahger D; Gottlieb S; Matetzky S; Goldenberg I; Beigel R; Iakobishvili Z
    J Cardiol; 2022 Mar; 79(3):342-351. PubMed ID: 34857429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Prognosis prediction of extremity and trunk wall soft-tissue sarcomas treated with surgical resection with radiomic analysis based on random survival forest.
    Yang Y; Ma X; Wang Y; Ding X
    Updates Surg; 2022 Feb; 74(1):355-365. PubMed ID: 34003477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Study on the prediction model of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease in the rural Xinjiang population based on survival analysis.
    Qian X; Keerman M; Zhang X; Guo H; He J; Maimaitijiang R; Wang X; Ma J; Li Y; Ma R; Guo S
    BMC Public Health; 2023 Jun; 23(1):1041. PubMed ID: 37264356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Risk Prediction of One-Year Mortality in Patients with Cardiac Arrhythmias Using Random Survival Forest.
    Miao F; Cai YP; Zhang YX; Li Y; Zhang YT
    Comput Math Methods Med; 2015; 2015():303250. PubMed ID: 26379761
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Risk factors associated with major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events following percutaneous coronary intervention: a 10-year follow-up comparing random survival forest and Cox proportional-hazards model.
    Farhadian M; Dehdar Karsidani S; Mozayanimonfared A; Mahjub H
    BMC Cardiovasc Disord; 2021 Jan; 21(1):38. PubMed ID: 33461487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. ESKD Risk Prediction Model in a Multicenter Chronic Kidney Disease Cohort in China: A Derivation, Validation, and Comparison Study.
    Hui M; Ma J; Yang H; Gao B; Wang F; Wang J; Lv J; Zhang L; Yang L; Zhao M
    J Clin Med; 2023 Feb; 12(4):. PubMed ID: 36836039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of nomogram with random survival forest for prediction of survival in patients with spindle cell carcinoma.
    Zhang X; Liang J; Du Z; Xie Q; Li T; Tang F
    J Cancer Res Ther; 2022 Dec; 18(7):2006-2012. PubMed ID: 36647963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The Application and Comparison of Machine Learning Models for the Prediction of Breast Cancer Prognosis: Retrospective Cohort Study.
    Xiao J; Mo M; Wang Z; Zhou C; Shen J; Yuan J; He Y; Zheng Y
    JMIR Med Inform; 2022 Feb; 10(2):e33440. PubMed ID: 35179504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Novel head and neck cancer survival analysis approach: random survival forests versus Cox proportional hazards regression.
    Datema FR; Moya A; Krause P; Bäck T; Willmes L; Langeveld T; Baatenburg de Jong RJ; Blom HM
    Head Neck; 2012 Jan; 34(1):50-8. PubMed ID: 21322080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. MRI-based random survival Forest model improves prediction of progression-free survival to induction chemotherapy plus concurrent Chemoradiotherapy in Locoregionally Advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma.
    Pei W; Wang C; Liao H; Chen X; Wei Y; Huang X; Liang X; Bao H; Su D; Jin G
    BMC Cancer; 2022 Jul; 22(1):739. PubMed ID: 35794590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Prognosis prediction for glioblastoma multiforme patients using machine learning approaches: Development of the clinically applicable model.
    Kim Y; Kim KH; Park J; Yoon HI; Sung W
    Radiother Oncol; 2023 Jun; 183():109617. PubMed ID: 36921767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Developing and Validating Models to Predict Progression to Proliferative Diabetic Retinopathy.
    Guo Y; Yonamine S; Jian Ma C; Stewart JM; Acharya N; Arnold BF; McCulloch C; Sun CQ
    Ophthalmol Sci; 2023 Jun; 3(2):100276. PubMed ID: 36950087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Development and validation of a cardiovascular diseases risk prediction model for Chinese males (CVDMCM).
    Shan Y; Zhang Y; Zhao Y; Lu Y; Chen B; Yang L; Tan C; Bai Y; Sang Y; Liu J; Jian M; Ruan L; Zhang C; Li T
    Front Cardiovasc Med; 2022; 9():967097. PubMed ID: 36465447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Bi-Centric Independent Validation of Outcome Prediction after Radioembolization of Primary and Secondary Liver Cancer.
    Fabritius MP; Seidensticker M; Rueckel J; Heinze C; Pech M; Paprottka KJ; Paprottka PM; Topalis J; Bender A; Ricke J; Mittermeier A; Ingrisch M
    J Clin Med; 2021 Aug; 10(16):. PubMed ID: 34441964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.