These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

234 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31849787)

  • 1. The Sense of Agency in Driving Automation.
    Wen W; Kuroki Y; Asama H
    Front Psychol; 2019; 10():2691. PubMed ID: 31849787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Deceleration Assistance Mitigated the Trade-off Between Sense of Agency and Driving Performance.
    Wen W; Yun S; Yamashita A; Northcutt BD; Asama H
    Front Psychol; 2021; 12():643516. PubMed ID: 34149526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The effect of varying levels of vehicle automation on drivers' lane changing behaviour.
    Madigan R; Louw T; Merat N
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(2):e0192190. PubMed ID: 29466402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Improvement of driver active interventions during automated driving by displaying trajectory pointers-A driving simulator study.
    Ono S; Sasaki H; Kumon H; Fuwamoto Y; Kondo S; Narumi T; Tanikawa T; Hirose M
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2019; 20(sup1):S152-S156. PubMed ID: 31381449
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effective cues for accelerating young drivers' time to transfer control following a period of conditional automation.
    Wright TJ; Agrawal R; Samuel S; Wang Y; Zilberstein S; Fisher DL
    Accid Anal Prev; 2018 Jul; 116():14-20. PubMed ID: 29031513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Safer than the average human driver (who is less safe than me)? Examining a popular safety benchmark for self-driving cars.
    Nees MA
    J Safety Res; 2019 Jun; 69():61-68. PubMed ID: 31235236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. What's in a name? Drivers' perceptions of the use of five SAE Level 2 driving automation systems.
    Teoh ER
    J Safety Res; 2020 Feb; 72():145-151. PubMed ID: 32199557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Assessing drivers' response during automated driver support system failures with non-driving tasks.
    Shen S; Neyens DM
    J Safety Res; 2017 Jun; 61():149-155. PubMed ID: 28454860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effects of Task-Induced Fatigue in Prolonged Conditional Automated Driving.
    Jarosch O; Bellem H; Bengler K
    Hum Factors; 2019 Nov; 61(7):1186-1199. PubMed ID: 30657711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. User expectations of partial driving automation capabilities and their effect on information design preferences in the vehicle.
    Ulahannan A; Cain R; Thompson S; Skrypchuk L; Mouzakitis A; Jennings P; Birrell S
    Appl Ergon; 2020 Jan; 82():102969. PubMed ID: 31600714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Asleep at the automated wheel-Sleepiness and fatigue during highly automated driving.
    Vogelpohl T; Kühn M; Hummel T; Vollrath M
    Accid Anal Prev; 2019 May; 126():70-84. PubMed ID: 29571975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. What determines the take-over time? An integrated model approach of driver take-over after automated driving.
    Zeeb K; Buchner A; Schrauf M
    Accid Anal Prev; 2015 May; 78():212-221. PubMed ID: 25794922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Does assisted driving behavior lead to safety-critical encounters with unequipped vehicles' drivers?
    Preuk K; Stemmler E; Schießl C; Jipp M
    Accid Anal Prev; 2016 Oct; 95(Pt A):149-56. PubMed ID: 27442594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Longitudinal control behaviour: Analysis and modelling based on experimental surveys in Italy and the UK.
    Pariota L; Bifulco GN; Galante F; Montella A; Brackstone M
    Accid Anal Prev; 2016 Apr; 89():74-87. PubMed ID: 26828955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Automation Expectation Mismatch: Incorrect Prediction Despite Eyes on Threat and Hands on Wheel.
    Victor TW; Tivesten E; Gustavsson P; Johansson J; Sangberg F; Ljung Aust M
    Hum Factors; 2018 Dec; 60(8):1095-1116. PubMed ID: 30096002
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Keep Your Scanners Peeled: Gaze Behavior as a Measure of Automation Trust During Highly Automated Driving.
    Hergeth S; Lorenz L; Vilimek R; Krems JF
    Hum Factors; 2016 May; 58(3):509-19. PubMed ID: 26843570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effects of scheduled manual driving on drowsiness and response to take over request: A simulator study towards understanding drivers in automated driving.
    Wu Y; Kihara K; Takeda Y; Sato T; Akamatsu M; Kitazaki S
    Accid Anal Prev; 2019 Mar; 124():202-209. PubMed ID: 30665055
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Practice makes better - Learning effects of driving with a multi-stage collision warning.
    Winkler S; Kazazi J; Vollrath M
    Accid Anal Prev; 2018 Aug; 117():398-409. PubMed ID: 29477461
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Impact of Automation on Drivers' Performance in Agricultural Semi-Autonomous Vehicles.
    Bashiri B; Mann DD
    J Agric Saf Health; 2015 Apr; 21(2):129-39. PubMed ID: 26204788
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Driver-centred vehicle automation: using network analysis for agent-based modelling of the driver in highly automated driving systems.
    Banks VA; Stanton NA
    Ergonomics; 2016 Nov; 59(11):1442-1452. PubMed ID: 26912405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.