These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

125 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31850383)

  • 1. Assessment of Image Quality in Digital Radiographs Submitted for Hip Dysplasia Screening.
    Moorman L; Precht H; Jensen J; Svalastoga E; Nielsen DH; Proschowsky HF; McEvoy FJ
    Front Vet Sci; 2019; 6():428. PubMed ID: 31850383
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The influence of a novel edge enhancement software on image quality of DR hand images of patients with rheumatoid arthritis.
    Outzen CB; Maron D; Nissen J; Munk J; Grau LM; Juhl D; Precht H
    Radiography (Lond); 2021 Aug; 27(3):877-882. PubMed ID: 33676836
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of image quality in chest, hip and pelvis examinations between mobile equipment in nursing homes and static indirect radiography equipment in the hospital.
    Precht H; Hansen DL; Ring-Pedersen BM; Møller Hansen LF; Waaler D; Tingberg A; Midtgaard M; Jensen Ohlsen MG; Juhl Hankelbjerg ST; Ravn P; Jensen IE; Christensen JK; Blackburn Andersen PA
    Radiography (Lond); 2020 May; 26(2):e31-e37. PubMed ID: 32052778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Visual grading analysis of digital neonatal chest phantom X-ray images: Impact of detector type, dose and image processing on image quality.
    Smet MH; Breysem L; Mussen E; Bosmans H; Marshall NW; Cockmartin L
    Eur Radiol; 2018 Jul; 28(7):2951-2959. PubMed ID: 29460076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Radiographers' perspectives' on Visual Grading Analysis as a scientific method to evaluate image quality.
    Precht H; Hansson J; Outzen C; Hogg P; Tingberg A
    Radiography (Lond); 2019 Oct; 25 Suppl 1():S14-S18. PubMed ID: 31481182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Digital radiography of the thorax with selenium detector. Clinical results and optimization potential of the technique].
    Procacci C; Minniti S; Caumo F; Moore F; Ternullo S; Predicatori F; Locatelli F; Pistolesi GF
    Radiol Med; 1998 Nov; 96(5):446-53. PubMed ID: 10051867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Evaluation of image quality of lumbar spine images: a comparison between FFE and VGA.
    Tingberg A; Båth M; Håkansson M; Medin J; Besjakov J; Sandborg M; Alm-Carlsson G; Mattsson S; Månsson LG
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):53-61. PubMed ID: 15933081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Correlation of contrast-detail analysis and clinical image quality assessment in chest radiography with a human cadaver study.
    De Crop A; Bacher K; Van Hoof T; Smeets PV; Smet BS; Vergauwen M; Kiendys U; Duyck P; Verstraete K; D'Herde K; Thierens H
    Radiology; 2012 Jan; 262(1):298-304. PubMed ID: 22056687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Development of a zoomorphic test specimen for constancy testing on digital X-ray systems in veterinary radiology.
    Pöhlmann G; Lüpke M; Seiler C; Wefstaedt P; Bach JP; Nolte I; Seifert H
    Acta Vet Scand; 2019 Aug; 61(1):40. PubMed ID: 31429771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Comparison of the image quality of conventional and digital radiography in lizards. Mammography technique versus digital detector system].
    Bochmann M; Ludewig E; Pees M
    Tierarztl Prax Ausg K Kleintiere Heimtiere; 2011; 39(4):259-67. PubMed ID: 22143664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Comparison of four digital and one conventional radiographic image systems for the chest in a patient study with subsequent system optimization].
    Redlich U; Hoeschen C; Effenberger O; Fessel A; Preuss H; Reissberg S; Scherlach C; Döhring W
    Rofo; 2005 Feb; 177(2):272-8. PubMed ID: 15666237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Current state of practice regarding digital radiography exposure indicators and deviation indices: Report of AAPM Imaging Physics Committee Task Group 232.
    Dave JK; Jones AK; Fisher R; Hulme K; Rill L; Zamora D; Woodward A; Brady S; MacDougall RD; Goldman L; Lang S; Peck D; Apgar B; Shepard SJ; Uzenoff R; Willis C
    Med Phys; 2018 Nov; 45(11):e1146-e1160. PubMed ID: 30255505
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Influence of the characteristic curve on the clinical image quality of lumbar spine and chest radiographs.
    Tingberg A; Herrmann C; Lanhede B; Almén A; Sandborg M; McVey G; Mattsson S; Panzer W; Besjakov J; Månsson LG; Kheddache S; Alm Carlsson G; Dance DR; Tylén U; Zankl M
    Br J Radiol; 2004 Mar; 77(915):204-15. PubMed ID: 15020361
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. CAN SCATTER CORRECTION SOFTWARE REPLACE A GRID IN DR PELVIC EXAMINATIONS?
    Precht H; Mørup SD; Tingberg A; Outzen CB; Kusk KW; Nielsen RM; Midtgård M; Winther MB; Waaler D; Kusk MW
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2019 Dec; 187(1):8-16. PubMed ID: 31111927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Does software optimization influence the radiologists' perception in low dose paediatric pelvic examinations?
    Precht H; Waaler D; Outzen CB; Brock Thorsen JB; Steen T; Hellfritzsch MB; Aagesen H; Holst AK; Le P; Lindequist S; Rasmussen L; Tingberg A
    Radiography (Lond); 2019 May; 25(2):143-147. PubMed ID: 30955687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Description and implementation of a quality control program in an imaging-based clinical trial.
    Cagnon CH; Cody DD; McNitt-Gray MF; Seibert JA; Judy PF; Aberle DR
    Acad Radiol; 2006 Nov; 13(11):1431-41. PubMed ID: 17111584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Digital mammography using storage phosphor plate technique--optimizing image processing parameters for the visibility of lesions and anatomy.
    Kheddache S; Kvist H
    Eur J Radiol; 1997 May; 24(3):237-44. PubMed ID: 9232396
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A framework for optimising the radiographic technique in digital X-ray imaging.
    Samei E; Dobbins JT; Lo JY; Tornai MP
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):220-9. PubMed ID: 15933112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Quality of film-based and digital panoramic radiography.
    Molander B; Gröndahl HG; Ekestubbe A
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2004 Jan; 33(1):32-6. PubMed ID: 15140820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.