These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

148 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31851371)

  • 1. Test accuracy and potential sources of bias in diagnostic test evaluation.
    Bell KJ; Macaskill P; Loy C
    Med J Aust; 2020 Jan; 212(1):10-13.e1. PubMed ID: 31851371
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Sources of variation and bias in studies of diagnostic accuracy: a systematic review.
    Whiting P; Rutjes AW; Reitsma JB; Glas AS; Bossuyt PM; Kleijnen J
    Ann Intern Med; 2004 Feb; 140(3):189-202. PubMed ID: 14757617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve for medical researchers.
    Kumar R; Indrayan A
    Indian Pediatr; 2011 Apr; 48(4):277-87. PubMed ID: 21532099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. QUADOMICS: an adaptation of the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Assessment (QUADAS) for the evaluation of the methodological quality of studies on the diagnostic accuracy of '-omics'-based technologies.
    Lumbreras B; Porta M; Márquez S; Pollán M; Parker LA; Hernández-Aguado I
    Clin Biochem; 2008 Nov; 41(16-17):1316-25. PubMed ID: 18652812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. How to conduct a high-quality systematic review on diagnostic research topics.
    Yao X; Vella E; Brouwers M
    Surg Oncol; 2018 Mar; 27(1):70-75. PubMed ID: 29549907
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Diagnostic studies].
    Felder-Puig R; Mad P; Gartlehner G
    Wien Med Wochenschr; 2009; 159(13-14):359-66. PubMed ID: 19652944
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Diagnostic studies should follow international guidelines. Planning and evaluation requires theoretical and practical considerations].
    Björk J; Hellström M; Mejare I; Nyman U
    Lakartidningen; 2013 Mar 13-19; 110(11):562-5. PubMed ID: 23596850
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Critically appraising studies reporting assessing diagnostic tests.
    O'Connor A; Evans RB
    Vet Clin North Am Small Anim Pract; 2007 May; 37(3):487-97. PubMed ID: 17466752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Correcting for verification bias in studies of a diagnostic test's accuracy.
    Zhou XH
    Stat Methods Med Res; 1998 Dec; 7(4):337-53. PubMed ID: 9871951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Basic principles of diagnostic evaluation].
    Cohen J; Dubos F; Bossuyt P; Chalumeau M; Levy C; Martinot A
    Arch Pediatr; 2015 May; 22(5 Suppl 1):186-7. PubMed ID: 26112584
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Spectrum bias or spectrum effect? Subgroup variation in diagnostic test evaluation.
    Mulherin SA; Miller WC
    Ann Intern Med; 2002 Oct; 137(7):598-602. PubMed ID: 12353947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Evaluation of diagnostic procedures.
    Knottnerus JA; van Weel C; Muris JW
    BMJ; 2002 Feb; 324(7335):477-80. PubMed ID: 11859054
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Determining the area under the ROC curve for a binary diagnostic test.
    Cantor SB; Kattan MW
    Med Decis Making; 2000; 20(4):468-70. PubMed ID: 11059479
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Evidence-based laboratory medicine: addressing bias, generalisability and applicability in studies on diagnostic accuracy. The STARD initiative.
    McQueen M
    Clin Chem Lab Med; 2003 Jan; 41(1):1. PubMed ID: 12636041
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Better reporting of studies of diagnostic accuracy.
    Pai M; Sharma S
    Indian J Med Microbiol; 2005 Oct; 23(4):210-3. PubMed ID: 16327114
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Clinical use of diagnostic tests (Part 1): Analysis of the properties of a diagnostic test].
    Cerda L J; Cifuentes A L
    Rev Chilena Infectol; 2010 Jun; 27(3):205-8. PubMed ID: 20737121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Systematic reviews of studies of diagnostic test accuracy].
    Moreno G G; Pantoja C T
    Rev Med Chil; 2009 Feb; 137(2):303-7. PubMed ID: 19543656
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Grading evidence from test accuracy studies: what makes it challenging compared with the grading of effectiveness studies?
    Rogozińska E; Khan K
    Evid Based Med; 2017 Jun; 22(3):81-84. PubMed ID: 28600330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [The Danish clinical guidelines (Klaringsrapporter, 1996-2001: Insufficient evidence presented for the diagnostic accuracy of recommended clinical-biochemical tests].
    Jørgensen PE; Madsen JS; Jørgensen LG; Larsen TB; Hilden J; Magid E
    Ugeskr Laeger; 2004 Apr; 166(18):1667-70. PubMed ID: 15174403
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. How to conduct a high-quality original study on a diagnostic research topic.
    Yao X; Vella E
    Surg Oncol; 2017 Sep; 26(3):305-309. PubMed ID: 28807251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.