161 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31851427)
1. Ten questions to consider when interpreting results of a meta-epidemiological study-the MetaBLIND study as a case.
Moustgaard H; Jones HE; Savović J; Clayton GL; Sterne JA; Higgins JP; Hróbjartsson A
Res Synth Methods; 2020 Mar; 11(2):260-274. PubMed ID: 31851427
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Impact of blinding on estimated treatment effects in randomised clinical trials: meta-epidemiological study.
Moustgaard H; Clayton GL; Jones HE; Boutron I; Jørgensen L; Laursen DRT; Olsen MF; Paludan-Müller A; Ravaud P; Savović J; Sterne JAC; Higgins JPT; Hróbjartsson A
BMJ; 2020 Jan; 368():l6802. PubMed ID: 31964641
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Association Between Lack of Blinding and Mortality Results in Critical Care Randomized Controlled Trials: A Meta-Epidemiological Study.
Martin GL; Trioux T; Gaudry S; Tubach F; Hajage D; Dechartres A
Crit Care Med; 2021 Oct; 49(10):1800-1811. PubMed ID: 33927122
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Empirical Evidence of Study Design Biases in Randomized Trials: Systematic Review of Meta-Epidemiological Studies.
Page MJ; Higgins JP; Clayton G; Sterne JA; Hróbjartsson A; Savović J
PLoS One; 2016; 11(7):e0159267. PubMed ID: 27398997
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Problems with the MetaBLIND study: An examination of data on blinding patients in trials with patient-reported outcomes.
Tack M
J Health Psychol; 2023 Aug; 28(9):861-881. PubMed ID: 34875934
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Registered trials report less beneficial treatment effects than unregistered ones: a meta-epidemiological study in orthodontics.
Papageorgiou SN; Xavier GM; Cobourne MT; Eliades T
J Clin Epidemiol; 2018 Aug; 100():44-52. PubMed ID: 29705094
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Association between pacifier use and breast-feeding, sudden infant death syndrome, infection and dental malocclusion.
Callaghan A; Kendall G; Lock C; Mahony A; Payne J; Verrier L
JBI Libr Syst Rev; 2005; 3(6):1-33. PubMed ID: 27819973
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Label-invariant models for the analysis of meta-epidemiological data.
Rhodes KM; Mawdsley D; Turner RM; Jones HE; Savović J; Higgins JPT
Stat Med; 2018 Jan; 37(1):60-70. PubMed ID: 28929507
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Summarizing systematic reviews: methodological development, conduct and reporting of an umbrella review approach.
Aromataris E; Fernandez R; Godfrey CM; Holly C; Khalil H; Tungpunkom P
Int J Evid Based Healthc; 2015 Sep; 13(3):132-40. PubMed ID: 26360830
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Should meta-analyses of interventions include observational studies in addition to randomized controlled trials? A critical examination of underlying principles.
Shrier I; Boivin JF; Steele RJ; Platt RW; Furlan A; Kakuma R; Brophy J; Rossignol M
Am J Epidemiol; 2007 Nov; 166(10):1203-9. PubMed ID: 17712019
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Can statistic adjustment of OR minimize the potential confounding bias for meta-analysis of case-control study? A secondary data analysis.
Liu T; Nie X; Wu Z; Zhang Y; Feng G; Cai S; Lv Y; Peng X
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2017 Dec; 17(1):179. PubMed ID: 29284414
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A meta-epidemiological study to examine the association between bias and treatment effects in neonatal trials.
Bialy L; Vandermeer B; Lacaze-Masmonteil T; Dryden DM; Hartling L
Evid Based Child Health; 2014 Dec; 9(4):1052-9. PubMed ID: 25504975
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Effects of study precision and risk of bias in networks of interventions: a network meta-epidemiological study.
Chaimani A; Vasiliadis HS; Pandis N; Schmid CH; Welton NJ; Salanti G
Int J Epidemiol; 2013 Aug; 42(4):1120-31. PubMed ID: 23811232
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Risk of bias: a simulation study of power to detect study-level moderator effects in meta-analysis.
Hempel S; Miles JN; Booth MJ; Wang Z; Morton SC; Shekelle PG
Syst Rev; 2013 Nov; 2():107. PubMed ID: 24286208
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Influence of Sponsorship Bias on Treatment Effect Size Estimates in Randomized Trials of Oral Health Interventions: A Meta-epidemiological Study.
Saltaji H; Armijo-Olivo S; Cummings GG; Amin M; Major PW; da Costa BR; Flores-Mir C
J Evid Based Dent Pract; 2021 Jun; 21(2):101544. PubMed ID: 34391563
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Combining meta-epidemiological study datasets on commercial funding of randomised clinical trials: Database, methods, and descriptive results of the COMFIT study.
Nejstgaard CH; Lundh A; Abdi S; Clayton G; Gelle MHA; Laursen DRT; Olorisade BK; Savović J; Hróbjartsson A;
Res Synth Methods; 2022 Mar; 13(2):214-228. PubMed ID: 34558198
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Meta-epidemiology and the MetaBLIND study: Response to Tack.
Moustgaard H; Hróbjartsson A
J Health Psychol; 2023 Aug; 28(9):882-886. PubMed ID: 37038625
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Commercial funding and estimated intervention effects in randomized clinical trials: Systematic review of meta-epidemiological studies.
Nejstgaard CH; Laursen DRT; Lundh A; Hróbjartsson A
Res Synth Methods; 2023 Mar; 14(2):144-155. PubMed ID: 36357935
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Agreement was moderate between data-based and opinion-based assessments of biases affecting randomized trials within meta-analyses.
Turner RM; Rhodes KM; Jones HE; Higgins JPT; Haskins JA; Whiting PF; Hróbjartsson A; Caldwell DM; Morris RW; Reeves BC; Worthington HV; Boutron I; Savović J
J Clin Epidemiol; 2020 Sep; 125():16-25. PubMed ID: 32416338
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
