BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

103 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3185180)

  • 1. Focusing technology assessment using medical decision theory.
    Phelps CE; Mushlin AI
    Med Decis Making; 1988; 8(4):279-89. PubMed ID: 3185180
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Clinical trials of cost effectiveness in technology evaluation.
    Valk PE
    Q J Nucl Med; 2000 Jun; 44(2):197-203. PubMed ID: 10967629
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Evaluation of medical technologies: a generalized ROC analysis.
    Sainfort F
    Med Decis Making; 1991; 11(3):208-20. PubMed ID: 1908934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Telemedicine for the Medicare population: pediatric, obstetric, and clinician-indirect home interventions.
    Hersh WR; Wallace JA; Patterson PK; Shapiro SE; Kraemer DF; Eilers GM; Chan BK; Greenlick MR; Helfand M
    Evid Rep Technol Assess (Summ); 2001 Aug; (24 Suppl):1-32. PubMed ID: 11569328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Technology assessment in medicine.
    Littenberg B
    Acad Med; 1992 Jul; 67(7):424-8. PubMed ID: 1616553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Health technology assessment of medical devices: What is different? An overview of three European projects.
    Schnell-Inderst P; Mayer J; Lauterberg J; Hunger T; Arvandi M; Conrads-Frank A; Nachtnebel A; Wild C; Siebert U
    Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes; 2015; 109(4-5):309-18. PubMed ID: 26354131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Decision tools in health care: focus on the problem, not the solution.
    Liu J; Wyatt JC; Altman DG
    BMC Med Inform Decis Mak; 2006 Jan; 6():4. PubMed ID: 16426446
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. An introduction to utility measurement in health care.
    Ferguson BM; Keown PA
    Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol; 1995 Apr; 16(4):240-7. PubMed ID: 7636174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Technology assessment in health care: group process and decision theory.
    Jacoby I; Pauker SG
    Isr J Med Sci; 1986; 22(3-4):183-90. PubMed ID: 3744769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A primer on the assessment of medical technologies.
    Matuszewski KA
    Pharm Pract Manag Q; 1997 Jan; 16(4):53-65. PubMed ID: 10164160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [The critical role of research evidence in the framework of health technology assessment].
    Sauerland S
    Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz; 2006 Mar; 49(3):251-6. PubMed ID: 16477456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Study design for concurrent development, assessment, and implementation of new diagnostic imaging technology.
    Hunink MG; Krestin GP
    Radiology; 2002 Mar; 222(3):604-14. PubMed ID: 11867773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Technology assessment in medicine: methods, status and trends.
    Hendee WR
    Med Prog Technol; 1991; 17(2):69-75. PubMed ID: 1835752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The clinical context of technology assessment.
    Smits HL
    J Health Polit Policy Law; 1984; 9(l):31-40. PubMed ID: 11650667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Assessing medical technologies in development. A new paradigm of medical technology assessment.
    Hummel MJ; van Rossum W; Verkerke GJ; Rakhorst G
    Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2000; 16(4):1214-9. PubMed ID: 11155841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Cost-effectiveness analysis in the assessment of diagnostic imaging technologies.
    Gazelle GS; McMahon PM; Siebert U; Beinfeld MT
    Radiology; 2005 May; 235(2):361-70. PubMed ID: 15858079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A clinical approach to technology assessment: how do we and how should we choose the right treatment?
    Zietman A; Ibbott G
    Semin Radiat Oncol; 2012 Jan; 22(1):11-7. PubMed ID: 22177874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Globally optimal trial design for local decision making.
    Eckermann S; Willan AR
    Health Econ; 2009 Feb; 18(2):203-16. PubMed ID: 18435429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Toward an applied technology for quality measurement in health care.
    Berwick DM
    Med Decis Making; 1988; 8(4):253-8. PubMed ID: 3054397
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The assessment process: a microscopic view.
    Murphy JR
    Med Prog Technol; 1991; 17(2):77-83. PubMed ID: 1835753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.