These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

99 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31852019)

  • 21. A Trade-off Between Invasiveness and Efficacy: Ureteroscopy vs Shock Wave Lithotripsy: Commentary on: Comparative effectiveness of shock wave lithotripsy and ureteroscopy for treating patients with kidney stones.
    Shakeri A; Van Asseldonk B; Elterman DS
    Urology; 2015 Nov; 86(5):850-1. PubMed ID: 26375846
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. The use of shock wave lithotripsy for renal calculi.
    Putman SS; Hamilton BD; Johnson DB
    Curr Opin Urol; 2004 Mar; 14(2):117-21. PubMed ID: 15075841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Ureteral stone manipulation before extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy.
    Evans RJ; Wingfield DD; Morollo BA; Jenkins AD
    J Urol; 1988 Jan; 139(1):33-6. PubMed ID: 3336100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. A randomized outcomes trial of ureteral stents for extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy of solitary kidney or proximal ureteral stones.
    Chandhoke PS; Barqawi AZ; Wernecke C; Chee-Awai RA
    J Urol; 2002 May; 167(5):1981-3. PubMed ID: 11956422
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Evaluation of renal function in children undergoing extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy.
    Fayad A; El-Sheikh MG; Abdelmohsen M; Abdelraouf H
    J Urol; 2010 Sep; 184(3):1111-4. PubMed ID: 20650495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Predictive value of low tube voltage and dual-energy CT for successful shock wave lithotripsy: an in vitro study.
    Largo R; Stolzmann P; Fankhauser CD; Poyet C; Wolfsgruber P; Sulser T; Alkadhi H; Winklhofer S
    Urolithiasis; 2016 Jun; 44(3):271-6. PubMed ID: 26391614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Treatment of renal stones in children: a comparison between percutaneous nephrolithotomy and shock wave lithotripsy.
    Shokeir AA; Sheir KZ; El-Nahas AR; El-Assmy AM; Eassa W; El-Kappany HA
    J Urol; 2006 Aug; 176(2):706-10. PubMed ID: 16813924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Effect of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy on kidney growth in children.
    Fayad A; El-Sheikh MG; El-Fayoumy H; El-Sergany R; Abd El Bary A
    J Urol; 2012 Sep; 188(3):928-31. PubMed ID: 22819405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Can Phyllanthus niruri affect the efficacy of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for renal stones? A randomized, prospective, long-term study.
    Micali S; Sighinolfi MC; Celia A; De Stefani S; Grande M; Cicero AF; Bianchi G
    J Urol; 2006 Sep; 176(3):1020-2. PubMed ID: 16890682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Use of ureteral stent in extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for upper urinary calculi: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Shen P; Jiang M; Yang J; Li X; Li Y; Wei W; Dai Y; Zeng H; Wang J
    J Urol; 2011 Oct; 186(4):1328-35. PubMed ID: 21855945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Is Tamsulosin Effective after Shock Wave Lithotripsy for Pediatric Renal Stones? A Randomized, Controlled Study.
    Shahat A; Elderwy A; Safwat AS; Abdelkawi IF; Reda A; Abdelsalam Y; Sayed M; Hammouda H
    J Urol; 2016 Apr; 195(4 Pt 2):1284-8. PubMed ID: 26926538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for radiolucent stones.
    Kumar S; Srinivasan V
    J Natl Med Assoc; 1992 Sep; 84(9):797-9. PubMed ID: 1404478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Three-dimensional assessment of urinary stone on non-contrast helical computed tomography as the predictor of stonestreet formation after extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for stones smaller than 20 mm.
    Yoshida S; Hayashi T; Morozumi M; Osada H; Honda N; Yamada T
    Int J Urol; 2007 Jul; 14(7):665-7. PubMed ID: 17645618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Predicting effectiveness of extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy by stone attenuation value.
    Shah K; Kurien A; Mishra S; Ganpule A; Muthu V; Sabnis RB; Desai M
    J Endourol; 2010 Jul; 24(7):1169-73. PubMed ID: 20575686
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy monotherapy: experience with piezoelectric second generation lithotriptor in 642 patients.
    Kim SC; Moon YT; Kim KD
    J Urol; 1989 Sep; 142(3):674-8. PubMed ID: 2769842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy of ureteral stones: clinical experience and experimental findings.
    Mueller SC; Wilbert D; Thueroff JW; Alken P
    J Urol; 1986 Apr; 135(4):831-4. PubMed ID: 3959215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Preoperative nomograms for predicting stone-free rate after extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy.
    Kanao K; Nakashima J; Nakagawa K; Asakura H; Miyajima A; Oya M; Ohigashi T; Murai M
    J Urol; 2006 Oct; 176(4 Pt 1):1453-6; discussion 1456-7. PubMed ID: 16952658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for large renal stones. To what size is extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy alone feasible?
    Ackermann D; Claus R; Zehntner C; Scheiber K
    Eur Urol; 1988; 15(1-2):5-8. PubMed ID: 3215235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Efficacy and cost-effectiveness of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for solitary lower pole renal calculi.
    May DJ; Chandhoke PS
    J Urol; 1998 Jan; 159(1):24-7. PubMed ID: 9400429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Role of alpha-1 blocker in expulsion of stone fragments after extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for renal stones.
    Pirzada AJ; Anwar A; Javed A; Memon I; Mohammad A
    J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad; 2011; 23(2):125-9. PubMed ID: 24800362
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.