209 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31852396)
1. Importance of buffer lands to determining risk to ecological resources at legacy contaminated sites: A case study for the Department of Energy's Hanford Site, Washington, USA.
Burger J; Gochfeld M; Jeitner C
J Toxicol Environ Health A; 2019; 82(22):1151-1163. PubMed ID: 31852396
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Risk to ecological resources following remediation can be due mainly to increased resource value of successful restoration: A case study from the Department of Energy's Hanford Site.
Burger J; Gochfeld M; Kosson DS; Brown KG; Salisbury JA; Jeitner C
Environ Res; 2020 Jul; 186():109536. PubMed ID: 32344209
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Evaluation of ecological resources at operating facilities at contaminated sites: The Department of Energy's Hanford Site as a case study.
Burger J; Gochfeld M; Kosson DS; Brown KG; Salisbury JA; Jeitner C
Environ Res; 2019 Mar; 170():452-462. PubMed ID: 30640079
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Risk valuation of ecological resources at contaminated deactivation and decommissioning facilities: methodology and a case study at the Department of Energy's Hanford site.
Burger J; Gochfeld M; Jeitner C
Environ Monit Assess; 2018 Jul; 190(8):478. PubMed ID: 30030638
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A Methodology to Evaluate Ecological Resources and Risk Using Two Case Studies at the Department of Energy's Hanford Site.
Burger J; Gochfeld M; Bunn A; Downs J; Jeitner C; Pittfield T; Salisbury J; Kosson D
Environ Manage; 2017 Mar; 59(3):357-372. PubMed ID: 27904947
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A paradigm for protecting ecological resources following remediation as a function of future land use designations: a case study for the Department of Energy's Hanford Site.
Burger J; Gochfeld M; Kosson DS; Brown KG; Salisbury J; Jeitner C
Environ Monit Assess; 2020 Feb; 192(3):181. PubMed ID: 32065319
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The costs of delaying remediation on human, ecological, and eco-cultural resources: Considerations for the Department of Energy: A methodological framework.
Burger J; Gochfeld M; Kosson DS; Brown KG; Bliss LS; Bunn A; Clarke JH; Mayer HJ; Salisbury JA
Sci Total Environ; 2019 Feb; 649():1054-1064. PubMed ID: 30308877
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A framework for increasing sustainability and reducing risk to ecological resources through integration of remediation planning and implementation.
Burger J
Environ Res; 2019 May; 172():586-595. PubMed ID: 30875512
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Costs and Benefits of Delaying Remediation on Ecological Resources at Contaminated Sites.
Burger J
Ecohealth; 2019 Sep; 16(3):454-475. PubMed ID: 31377906
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Role of uncertainties in protecting ecological resources during remediation and restoration.
Burger J; Gochfeld M; Bunn A; Looney B; Jeitner C
J Toxicol Environ Health A; 2021 Jun; 84(12):485-502. PubMed ID: 33632081
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Contaminated Department of Energy facilities and ecosystems: weighing the ecological risks.
Burger J
J Toxicol Environ Health A; 2000 Sep; 61(2):141-54. PubMed ID: 11032427
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Integrating long-term stewardship goals into the remediation process: natural resource damages and the Department of Energy.
Burger J; Gochfeld M; Powers CW
J Environ Manage; 2007 Jan; 82(2):189-99. PubMed ID: 16554118
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Depth of the biologically active zone in upland habitats at the Hanford Site, Washington: Implications for remediation and ecological risk management.
Sample BE; Lowe J; Seeley P; Markin M; McCarthy C; Hansen J; Aly AH
Integr Environ Assess Manag; 2015 Jan; 11(1):150-60. PubMed ID: 25209119
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The importance of recognizing Buffer Zones to lands being developed, restored, or remediated: on planning for protection of ecological resources.
Burger J; Gochfeld M; Brown KG; Ng K; Cortes M; Kosson D
J Toxicol Environ Health A; 2024 Feb; 87(4):133-149. PubMed ID: 37997947
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The role of risk and future land use in cleanup decisions at the Department Of Energy.
Burger J; Powers C; Greenberg M; Gochfeld M
Risk Anal; 2004 Dec; 24(6):1539-49. PubMed ID: 15660610
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Shifting priorities at the Department of Energy's bomb factories: protecting human and ecological health.
Burger J; Leschine TM; Greenberg M; Karr JR; Gochfeld M; Powers CW
Environ Manage; 2003 Feb; 31(2):157-67. PubMed ID: 12520373
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Risk perception, future land use and stewardship: comparison of attitudes about Hanford Site and Idaho National Engineering and Environmental Laboratory.
Burger J; Sanchez J; Roush D; Gochfeld M
J Environ Manage; 2001 Apr; 61(4):265-80. PubMed ID: 11383101
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Natural resource protection on buffer lands: integrating resource evaluation and economics.
Burger J; Gochfeld M; Greenberg M
Environ Monit Assess; 2008 Jul; 142(1-3):1-9. PubMed ID: 17899418
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Restoration, stewardship, environmental health, and policy: understanding stakeholders' perceptions.
Burger J
Environ Manage; 2002 Nov; 30(5):631-40. PubMed ID: 12375084
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Environmental management: integrating ecological evaluation, remediation, restoration, natural resource damage assessment and long-term stewardship on contaminated lands.
Burger J
Sci Total Environ; 2008 Aug; 400(1-3):6-19. PubMed ID: 18687455
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
