These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
190 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31852730)
1. Novel Bayesian Networks for Genomic Prediction of Developmental Traits in Biomass Sorghum. Dos Santos JPR; Fernandes SB; McCoy S; Lozano R; Brown PJ; Leakey ADB; Buckler ES; Garcia AAF; Gore MA G3 (Bethesda); 2020 Feb; 10(2):769-781. PubMed ID: 31852730 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Impact of genotype imputation on the performance of GBLUP and Bayesian methods for genomic prediction. Chen L; Li C; Sargolzaei M; Schenkel F PLoS One; 2014; 9(7):e101544. PubMed ID: 25025158 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Efficiency of multi-trait, indirect, and trait-assisted genomic selection for improvement of biomass sorghum. Fernandes SB; Dias KOG; Ferreira DF; Brown PJ Theor Appl Genet; 2018 Mar; 131(3):747-755. PubMed ID: 29218378 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Genomic prediction of hybrid performance for agronomic traits in sorghum. Sapkota S; Boatwright JL; Kumar N; Myers M; Cox A; Ackerman A; Caughman W; Brenton ZW; Boyles RE; Kresovich S G3 (Bethesda); 2023 Apr; 13(4):. PubMed ID: 36454599 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Genomic Prediction Using Multi-trait Weighted GBLUP Accounting for Heterogeneous Variances and Covariances Across the Genome. Karaman E; Lund MS; Anche MT; Janss L; Su G G3 (Bethesda); 2018 Nov; 8(11):3549-3558. PubMed ID: 30194089 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Using markers with large effect in genetic and genomic predictions. Lopes MS; Bovenhuis H; van Son M; Nordbø Ø; Grindflek EH; Knol EF; Bastiaansen JW J Anim Sci; 2017 Jan; 95(1):59-71. PubMed ID: 28177367 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Predictive ability of multi-population genomic prediction methods of phenotypes for reproduction traits in Chinese and Austrian pigs. Wang X; Zhang Z; Du H; Pfeiffer C; Mészáros G; Ding X Genet Sel Evol; 2024 Jun; 56(1):49. PubMed ID: 38926647 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A Multiple-Trait Bayesian Lasso for Genome-Enabled Analysis and Prediction of Complex Traits. Gianola D; Fernando RL Genetics; 2020 Feb; 214(2):305-331. PubMed ID: 31879318 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Genomic Selection for Optimum Index with Dry Biomass Yield, Dry Mass Fraction of Fresh Material, and Plant Height in Biomass Sorghum. Habyarimana E; Lopez-Cruz M; Baloch FS Genes (Basel); 2020 Jan; 11(1):. PubMed ID: 31948110 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Early prediction of biomass in hybrid rye based on hyperspectral data surpasses genomic predictability in less-related breeding material. Galán RJ; Bernal-Vasquez AM; Jebsen C; Piepho HP; Thorwarth P; Steffan P; Gordillo A; Miedaner T Theor Appl Genet; 2021 May; 134(5):1409-1422. PubMed ID: 33630103 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Performances of Adaptive MultiBLUP, Bayesian regressions, and weighted-GBLUP approaches for genomic predictions in Belgian Blue beef cattle. Gualdrón Duarte JL; Gori AS; Hubin X; Lourenco D; Charlier C; Misztal I; Druet T BMC Genomics; 2020 Aug; 21(1):545. PubMed ID: 32762654 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A Bayesian Genomic Multi-output Regressor Stacking Model for Predicting Multi-trait Multi-environment Plant Breeding Data. Montesinos-López OA; Montesinos-López A; Crossa J; Cuevas J; Montesinos-López JC; Gutiérrez ZS; Lillemo M; Philomin J; Singh R G3 (Bethesda); 2019 Oct; 9(10):3381-3393. PubMed ID: 31427455 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. GWAS by GBLUP: Single and Multimarker EMMAX and Bayes Factors, with an Example in Detection of a Major Gene for Horse Gait. Legarra A; Ricard A; Varona L G3 (Bethesda); 2018 Jul; 8(7):2301-2308. PubMed ID: 29748199 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Genomic Selection for Antioxidant Production in a Panel of Habyarimana E; Lopez-Cruz M Genes (Basel); 2019 Oct; 10(11):. PubMed ID: 31653099 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Across population genomic prediction scenarios in which Bayesian variable selection outperforms GBLUP. van den Berg S; Calus MP; Meuwissen TH; Wientjes YC BMC Genet; 2015 Dec; 16():146. PubMed ID: 26698836 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Evaluation of Bayesian alphabet and GBLUP based on different marker density for genomic prediction in Alpine Merino sheep. Zhu S; Guo T; Yuan C; Liu J; Li J; Han M; Zhao H; Wu Y; Sun W; Wang X; Wang T; Liu J; Tiambo CK; Yue Y; Yang B G3 (Bethesda); 2021 Oct; 11(11):. PubMed ID: 34849779 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Multi-Trait Genomic Prediction of Yield-Related Traits in US Soft Wheat under Variable Water Regimes. Guo J; Khan J; Pradhan S; Shahi D; Khan N; Avci M; Mcbreen J; Harrison S; Brown-Guedira G; Murphy JP; Johnson J; Mergoum M; Esten Mason R; Ibrahim AMH; Sutton R; Griffey C; Babar MA Genes (Basel); 2020 Oct; 11(11):. PubMed ID: 33126620 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Performance of Bayesian and BLUP alphabets for genomic prediction: analysis, comparison and results. Meher PK; Rustgi S; Kumar A Heredity (Edinb); 2022 Jun; 128(6):519-530. PubMed ID: 35508540 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Genetic variation and association of yield, yield components, and carbon storage in sorghum (Sorghum bicolor [L.] Moench) genotypes. Ngidi A; Shimelis H; Abady S; Chaplot V; Figlan S BMC Genom Data; 2024 Aug; 25(1):74. PubMed ID: 39090581 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of genomic predictions using genomic relationship matrices built with different weighting factors to account for locus-specific variances. Su G; Christensen OF; Janss L; Lund MS J Dairy Sci; 2014 Oct; 97(10):6547-59. PubMed ID: 25129495 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]