These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
268 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31854152)
1. Scoring System to Stratify Malignancy Risks for Mammographic Microcalcifications Based on Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System 5th Edition Descriptors. Youk JH; Gweon HM; Son EJ; Eun NL; Choi EJ; Kim JA Korean J Radiol; 2019 Dec; 20(12):1646-1652. PubMed ID: 31854152 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Scoring system based on BI-RADS lexicon to predict probability of malignancy in suspicious microcalcifications. Youk JH; Son EJ; Kim JA; Moon HJ; Kim MJ; Choi CH; Kim EK Ann Surg Oncol; 2012 May; 19(5):1491-8. PubMed ID: 22173328 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The positive predictive value of BI-RADS microcalcification descriptors and final assessment categories. Bent CK; Bassett LW; D'Orsi CJ; Sayre JW AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2010 May; 194(5):1378-83. PubMed ID: 20410428 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Evaluation of malignancy risk stratification of microcalcifications detected on mammography: a study based on the 5th edition of BI-RADS. Kim SY; Kim HY; Kim EK; Kim MJ; Moon HJ; Yoon JH Ann Surg Oncol; 2015 Sep; 22(9):2895-901. PubMed ID: 25608770 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. MRI for the assessment of malignancy in BI-RADS 4 mammographic microcalcifications. Bennani-Baiti B; Dietzel M; Baltzer PA PLoS One; 2017; 12(11):e0188679. PubMed ID: 29190656 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. BI-RADS lexicon for US and mammography: interobserver variability and positive predictive value. Lazarus E; Mainiero MB; Schepps B; Koelliker SL; Livingston LS Radiology; 2006 May; 239(2):385-91. PubMed ID: 16569780 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. External validation of a publicly available computer assisted diagnostic tool for mammographic mass lesions with two high prevalence research datasets. Benndorf M; Burnside ES; Herda C; Langer M; Kotter E Med Phys; 2015 Aug; 42(8):4987-96. PubMed ID: 26233224 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. "Category 4A" microcalcifications: how should this subcategory be applied to microcalcifications seen on mammography? Kim J; Kim EK; Kim MJ; Moon HJ; Yoon JH Acta Radiol; 2018 Feb; 59(2):147-153. PubMed ID: 28490180 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The Utility of the Fifth Edition of the BI-RADS Ultrasound Lexicon in Category 4 Breast Lesions: A Prospective Multicenter Study in China. Gu Y; Tian JW; Ran HT; Ren WD; Chang C; Yuan JJ; Kang CS; Deng YB; Wang H; Luo BM; Guo SL; Zhou Q; Xue ES; Zhan WW; Zhou Q; Li J; Zhou P; Zhang CQ; Chen M; Gu Y; Xu JF; Chen W; Zhang YH; Wang HQ; Li JC; Wang HY; Jiang YX Acad Radiol; 2022 Jan; 29 Suppl 1():S26-S34. PubMed ID: 32768352 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Evaluation of breast microcalcifications according to Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System criteria and Le Gal's classification. Gülsün M; Demirkazik FB; Ariyürek M Eur J Radiol; 2003 Sep; 47(3):227-31. PubMed ID: 12927667 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging in screening detected microcalcification lesions of the breast: is there any value? Uematsu T; Yuen S; Kasami M; Uchida Y Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2007 Jul; 103(3):269-81. PubMed ID: 17063274 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. MR Imaging for Diagnosis of Malignancy in Mammographic Microcalcifications: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Bennani-Baiti B; Baltzer PA Radiology; 2017 Jun; 283(3):692-701. PubMed ID: 27788035 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Bayesian network to predict breast cancer risk of mammographic microcalcifications and reduce number of benign biopsy results: initial experience. Burnside ES; Rubin DL; Fine JP; Shachter RD; Sisney GA; Leung WK Radiology; 2006 Sep; 240(3):666-73. PubMed ID: 16926323 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The value of breast MRI for BI-RADS category 4B mammographic microcalcification: based on the 5 Eun NL; Son EJ; Gweon HM; Youk JH; Kim JA Clin Radiol; 2018 Aug; 73(8):750-755. PubMed ID: 29853301 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Breast microcalcifications: the UK RCR 5-point breast imaging system or BI-RADS; which is the better predictor of malignancy? Metaxa L; Healy NA; O'Keeffe SA Br J Radiol; 2019 Nov; 92(1103):20190177. PubMed ID: 31365279 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Prediction for Breast Cancer in BI-RADS Category 4 Lesion Categorized by Age and Breast Composition of Women in Songklanagarind Hospital. Noonpradej S; Wangkulangkul P; Woodtichartpreecha P; Laohawiriyakamol S Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2021 Feb; 22(2):531-536. PubMed ID: 33639670 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A comparative study of the diagnostic value of contrast-enhanced breast MR imaging and mammography on patients with BI-RADS 3-5 microcalcifications. Li E; Li J; Song Y; Xue M; Zhou C PLoS One; 2014; 9(11):e111217. PubMed ID: 25365327 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Detection and diagnosis of automated breast ultrasound in patients with BI-RADS category 4 microcalcifications: a retrospective study. Yu LF; Dai CC; Zhu LX; Xu XJ; Yan HJ; Jiang CX; Bao LY BMC Med Imaging; 2024 May; 24(1):126. PubMed ID: 38807064 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of Positive Predictive Values of Categorization of Suspicious Calcifications Using the 4th and 5th Editions of BI-RADS. Park GE; Kim SH; Lee JM; Kang BJ; Chae BJ AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2019 Sep; 213(3):710-715. PubMed ID: 31063419 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]