These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

130 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31854362)

  • 21. Biomechanics of 3-implant-supported and 4-implant-supported mandibular screw-retained prostheses: A 3D finite element analysis study.
    Elsayyad AA; Abbas NA; AbdelNabi NM; Osman RB
    J Prosthet Dent; 2020 Jul; 124(1):68.e1-68.e10. PubMed ID: 32199642
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Effect of specific retention biomaterials for ball attachment on the biomechanical response of single implant-supported overdenture: A finite element analysis.
    Gibreel M; Sameh A; Hegazy S; Närhi TO; Vallittu PK; Perea-Lowery L
    J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2021 Oct; 122():104653. PubMed ID: 34229172
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Finite element analysis to compare complete denture and implant-retained overdentures with different attachment systems.
    Barão VA; Assunção WG; Tabata LF; Delben JA; Gomes EA; de Sousa EA; Rocha EP
    J Craniofac Surg; 2009 Jul; 20(4):1066-71. PubMed ID: 19553853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Photoelastic stress analysis of various retention mechanisms on 3-implant-retained mandibular overdentures.
    Celik G; Uludag B
    J Prosthet Dent; 2007 Apr; 97(4):229-35. PubMed ID: 17499093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. [Three-dimensional finite element analysis of different framework materials in implant-supported fixed mandibular prosthesis].
    Yu WQ; Li XQ; Chen SY; Ma XN; Xu X
    Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2021 Feb; 56(2):190-195. PubMed ID: 33557504
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Evaluation of stress patterns produced by implant-retained overdentures and implant-retained fixed partial denture.
    Mazaro JV; Filho HG; Vedovatto E; Pellizzer EP; Rezende MC; Zavanelli AC
    J Craniofac Surg; 2011 Nov; 22(6):2153-7. PubMed ID: 22067869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Experimental and numerical investigations of fracture and fatigue behaviour of implant-supported bars with distal extension made of three different materials.
    Mochalski J; Fröhls C; Keilig L; Bourauel C; Dörsam I
    Biomed Tech (Berl); 2021 Jun; 66(3):305-316. PubMed ID: 34062636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Influence of implant number on the biomechanical behaviour of mandibular implant-retained/supported overdentures: a three-dimensional finite element analysis.
    Liu J; Pan S; Dong J; Mo Z; Fan Y; Feng H
    J Dent; 2013 Mar; 41(3):241-9. PubMed ID: 23160036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Comparative stress distribution of implant-retained mandibular ball-supported and bar-supported overlay dentures: a finite element analysis.
    Vafaei F; Khoshhal M; Bayat-Movahed S; Ahangary AH; Firooz F; Izady A; Rakhshan V
    J Oral Implantol; 2011 Aug; 37(4):421-9. PubMed ID: 20712443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Biomechanical behavior of 2-implant- and single-implant-retained mandibular overdentures with conventional or mini implants.
    Pisani MX; Presotto AGC; Mesquita MF; Barão VAR; Kemmoku DT; Del Bel Cury AA
    J Prosthet Dent; 2018 Sep; 120(3):421-430. PubMed ID: 29703669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. In vitro study of a mandibular implant overdenture retained with ball, magnet, or bar attachments: comparison of load transfer and denture stability.
    Tokuhisa M; Matsushita Y; Koyano K
    Int J Prosthodont; 2003; 16(2):128-34. PubMed ID: 12737242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Effect of the number of supporting implants on mandibular photoelastic models with different implant-retained overdenture designs.
    Celik G; Uludag B
    J Prosthodont; 2014 Jul; 23(5):374-80. PubMed ID: 24417330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Evaluation of Stress Distribution on Mandibular Implant-Supported Overdentures With Different Bone Heights and Attachment Types: A 3D Finite Element Analysis.
    Unsal GS; Erbasar GNH; Aykent F; Ozyilmaz OY; Ozdogan MS
    J Oral Implantol; 2019 Oct; 45(5):363-370. PubMed ID: 31536445
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Is one dental mini-implant biomechanically appropriate for the retention of a mandibular overdenture? A comparison with Morse taper and external hexagon platforms.
    Borges GA; Presotto AGC; Caldas RA; Pisani MX; Mesquita MF
    J Prosthet Dent; 2021 Mar; 125(3):491-499. PubMed ID: 32278498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Comparison of single-standing or connected implants on stress distribution in bone of mandibular overdentures: a two-dimensional finite element analysis.
    Tabata LF; Assunção WG; Barão VA; Gomes EA; Delben JA; de Sousa EA; Rocha EP
    J Craniofac Surg; 2010 May; 21(3):696-702. PubMed ID: 20485031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Comparison of Stress Distribution and Deformation of Four Prosthetic Materials in Full-mouth Rehabilitation with Implants: A Three-dimensional Finite Element Study.
    Chand YB; Mahendra J; Jigeesh N; Mahendra L; Shivasubramanian L; Perika SB
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2020 Nov; 21(11):1210-1217. PubMed ID: 33850065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Comparison of different designs of implant-retained overdentures and fixed full-arch implant-supported prosthesis on stress distribution in edentulous mandible--a computed tomography-based three-dimensional finite element analysis.
    Barão VA; Delben JA; Lima J; Cabral T; Assunção WG
    J Biomech; 2013 Apr; 46(7):1312-20. PubMed ID: 23518207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. [A three-dimensional finite element stress analysis of implant-supported prosthesis and its supporting tissue in the edentulous mandible. Part 6. The influence of superstructure in mandibular complete implant overdenture and its supporting tissue].
    He J; Cen Y; Mao X
    Hua Xi Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 1997 Feb; 15(1):67-9. PubMed ID: 11480066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Comparison of stress distribution between complete denture and implant-retained overdenture-2D FEA.
    Assunção WG; Tabata LF; Barão VA; Rocha EP
    J Oral Rehabil; 2008 Oct; 35(10):766-74. PubMed ID: 18482352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Randomized, prospective, clinical evaluation of prosthodontic modalities for mandibular implant overdenture treatment.
    Burns DR; Unger JW; Coffey JP; Waldrop TC; Elswick RK
    J Prosthet Dent; 2011 Jul; 106(1):12-22. PubMed ID: 21723989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.