These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

162 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31855606)

  • 1. Individual Differences in Lexical Access Among Cochlear Implant Users.
    Nagels L; Bastiaanse R; Başkent D; Wagner A
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2020 Jan; 63(1):286-304. PubMed ID: 31855606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Lexical Access Changes Based on Listener Needs: Real-Time Word Recognition in Continuous Speech in Cochlear Implant Users.
    Smith FX; McMurray B
    Ear Hear; 2022 Sep-Oct 01; 43(5):1487-1501. PubMed ID: 35067570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Waiting for lexical access: Cochlear implants or severely degraded input lead listeners to process speech less incrementally.
    McMurray B; Farris-Trimble A; Rigler H
    Cognition; 2017 Dec; 169():147-164. PubMed ID: 28917133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Gated Word Recognition by Postlingually Deafened Adults With Cochlear Implants: Influence of Semantic Context.
    Patro C; Mendel LL
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2018 Jan; 61(1):145-158. PubMed ID: 29242894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The Effect of Residual Acoustic Hearing and Adaptation to Uncertainty on Speech Perception in Cochlear Implant Users: Evidence From Eye-Tracking.
    McMurray B; Farris-Trimble A; Seedorff M; Rigler H
    Ear Hear; 2016; 37(1):e37-51. PubMed ID: 26317298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. On the relationship between auditory cognition and speech intelligibility in cochlear implant users: An ERP study.
    Finke M; Büchner A; Ruigendijk E; Meyer M; Sandmann P
    Neuropsychologia; 2016 Jul; 87():169-181. PubMed ID: 27212057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Perception of Cantonese Lexical Tones by Pediatric Cochlear Implant Users.
    Holt CM; Lee KYS; Dowell RC; Vogel AP
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2018 Jan; 61(1):174-185. PubMed ID: 29344625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Production and perception of speech intonation in pediatric cochlear implant recipients and individuals with normal hearing.
    Peng SC; Tomblin JB; Turner CW
    Ear Hear; 2008 Jun; 29(3):336-51. PubMed ID: 18344873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. How Do You Deal With Uncertainty? Cochlear Implant Users Differ in the Dynamics of Lexical Processing of Noncanonical Inputs.
    McMurray B; Ellis TP; Apfelbaum KS
    Ear Hear; 2019; 40(4):961-980. PubMed ID: 30531260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Behavioral Measures of Temporal Processing and Speech Perception in Cochlear Implant Users.
    Blankenship C; Zhang F; Keith R
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2016 Oct; 27(9):701-713. PubMed ID: 27718347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Processing of Acoustic Cues in Lexical-Tone Identification by Pediatric Cochlear-Implant Recipients.
    Peng SC; Lu HP; Lu N; Lin YS; Deroche MLD; Chatterjee M
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2017 May; 60(5):1223-1235. PubMed ID: 28388709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. High-Variability Sentence Recognition in Long-Term Cochlear Implant Users: Associations With Rapid Phonological Coding and Executive Functioning.
    Smith GNL; Pisoni DB; Kronenberger WG
    Ear Hear; 2019; 40(5):1149-1161. PubMed ID: 30601227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Event-related potentials for better speech perception in noise by cochlear implant users.
    Soshi T; Hisanaga S; Kodama N; Kanekama Y; Samejima Y; Yumoto E; Sekiyama K
    Hear Res; 2014 Oct; 316():110-21. PubMed ID: 25158303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Vowel intelligibility in children with cochlear implants: An acoustic and articulatory study.
    Turgeon C; Trudeau-Fisette P; Fitzpatrick E; Ménard L
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2017 Oct; 101():87-96. PubMed ID: 28964317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Perception of lexical stress cued by low-frequency pitch and insights into speech perception in noise for cochlear implant users and normal hearing adults.
    Dincer D'Alessandro H; Mancini P
    Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2019 Oct; 276(10):2673-2680. PubMed ID: 31177325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The process of spoken word recognition in the face of signal degradation.
    Farris-Trimble A; McMurray B; Cigrand N; Tomblin JB
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2014 Feb; 40(1):308-27. PubMed ID: 24041330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effects of lexical characteristics and demographic factors on mandarin chinese open-set word recognition in children with cochlear implants.
    Liu H; Liu S; Wang S; Liu C; Kong Y; Zhang N; Li S; Yang Y; Han D; Zhang L
    Ear Hear; 2013; 34(2):221-8. PubMed ID: 23086423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Auditory cortical activity to different voice onset times in cochlear implant users.
    Han JH; Zhang F; Kadis DS; Houston LM; Samy RN; Smith ML; Dimitrijevic A
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2016 Feb; 127(2):1603-1617. PubMed ID: 26616545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Language processing fluency and verbal working memory in prelingually deaf long-term cochlear implant users: A pilot study.
    Kronenberger WG; Henning SC; Ditmars AM; Pisoni DB
    Cochlear Implants Int; 2018 Nov; 19(6):312-323. PubMed ID: 29976119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Evaluating the function of phonetic perceptual phenomena within speech recognition: an examination of the perception of /d/-/t/ by adult cochlear implant users.
    Iverson P
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2003 Feb; 113(2):1056-64. PubMed ID: 12597198
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.