These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

137 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31857754)

  • 1. Digital Breast Tomosynthesis as a Tool in Confirming Negative Surgical Margins in Non-palpable Breast Lesions.
    Chand JT; Sharma MM; Dharmarajan JP; Nambiar A
    Indian J Surg Oncol; 2019 Dec; 10(4):624-628. PubMed ID: 31857754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Digital breast tomosynthesis versus full-field digital mammography-Which modality provides more accurate prediction of margin status in specimen radiography?
    Amer HA; Schmitzberger F; Ingold-Heppner B; Kussmaul J; El Tohamy MF; Tantawy HI; Hamm B; Makowski M; Fallenberg EM
    Eur J Radiol; 2017 Aug; 93():258-264. PubMed ID: 28668424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Diagnostic accuracy of resection margin in specimen radiography: digital breast tomosynthesis versus full-field digital mammography.
    Romanucci G; Mercogliano S; Carucci E; Cina A; Zantedeschi E; Caneva A; Benassuti C; Fornasa F
    Radiol Med; 2021 Jun; 126(6):768-773. PubMed ID: 33625658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Digital Breast Tomosynthesis for Intraoperative Margin Assessment during Breast-Conserving Surgery.
    Park KU; Kuerer HM; Rauch GM; Leung JWT; Sahin AA; Wei W; Li Y; Black DM
    Ann Surg Oncol; 2019 Jun; 26(6):1720-1728. PubMed ID: 30877499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Obtaining adequate surgical margin status in breast-conservation therapy: intraoperative ultrasound-guided resection versus specimen mammography.
    Pop MM; Cristian S; Hanko-Bauer O; Ghiga DV; Georgescu R
    Clujul Med; 2018; 91(2):197-202. PubMed ID: 29785158
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Wire-guided localization biopsy to determine surgical margin status in patients with non-palpable suspicious breast lesions.
    Dogan L; Gulcelik MA; Yuksel M; Uyar O; Reis E
    Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2012; 13(10):4989-92. PubMed ID: 23244096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Diagnostic performance of tomosynthesis, digital mammography and a dedicated digital specimen radiography system versus pathological assessment of excised breast lesions.
    Almasarweh S; Sudah M; Okuma H; Joukainen S; Kärjä V; Vanninen R; Masarwah A
    Radiol Oncol; 2022 Dec; 56(4):461-470. PubMed ID: 36226804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Current status of ultrasound-guided surgery in the treatment of breast cancer.
    Volders JH; Haloua MH; Krekel NM; Meijer S; van den Tol PM
    World J Clin Oncol; 2016 Feb; 7(1):44-53. PubMed ID: 26862490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Ultrasound-guided excision combined with intraoperative assessment of gross macroscopic margins decreases the rate of reoperations for non-palpable invasive breast cancer.
    Ramos M; Díaz JC; Ramos T; Ruano R; Aparicio M; Sancho M; González-Orús JM
    Breast; 2013 Aug; 22(4):520-4. PubMed ID: 23110817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Negative Predictive Value of Ultrasound in Predicting Tumor-Free Margins in Specimen Sonography.
    Naz S; Hafeez S; Hussain Z; Hilal K
    J Coll Physicians Surg Pak; 2017 Dec; 27(12):747-750. PubMed ID: 29185399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Detecting residual tumor after excisional biopsy of impalpable breast carcinoma: efficacy of comparing preoperative mammograms with radiographs of the biopsy specimen.
    Lee CH; Carter D
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1995 Jan; 164(1):81-6. PubMed ID: 7998574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Lumpectomy Specimen Radiography: Does Orientation or 3-Dimensional Tomosynthesis Improve Margin Assessment?
    Mario J; Venkataraman S; Fein-Zachary V; Knox M; Brook A; Slanetz P
    Can Assoc Radiol J; 2019 Aug; 70(3):282-291. PubMed ID: 31300313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Digital breast tomosynthesis versus full-field digital mammography: comparison of the accuracy of lesion measurement and characterization using specimens.
    Seo N; Kim HH; Shin HJ; Cha JH; Kim H; Moon JH; Gong G; Ahn SH; Son BH
    Acta Radiol; 2014 Jul; 55(6):661-7. PubMed ID: 24005560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Digital mammography versus digital breast tomosynthesis for detection of breast cancer in the intraoperative specimen during breast-conserving surgery.
    Urano M; Shiraki N; Kawai T; Goto T; Endo Y; Yoshimoto N; Toyama T; Shibamoto Y
    Breast Cancer; 2016 Sep; 23(5):706-11. PubMed ID: 26198975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of synthetic mammography, reconstructed from digital breast tomosynthesis, and digital mammography: evaluation of lesion conspicuity and BI-RADS assessment categories.
    Mariscotti G; Durando M; Houssami N; Fasciano M; Tagliafico A; Bosco D; Casella C; Bogetti C; Bergamasco L; Fonio P; Gandini G
    Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2017 Dec; 166(3):765-773. PubMed ID: 28819781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Characterization of lesions in dense breasts: Does tomosynthesis help?
    Rangarajan K; Hari S; Thulkar S; Sharma S; Srivastava A; Parshad R
    Indian J Radiol Imaging; 2016; 26(2):210-5. PubMed ID: 27413268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT): initial experience in a clinical setting.
    Skaane P; Gullien R; Bjørndal H; Eben EB; Ekseth U; Haakenaasen U; Jahr G; Jebsen IN; Krager M
    Acta Radiol; 2012 Jun; 53(5):524-9. PubMed ID: 22593120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.