These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
115 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31858385)
21. Rethinking research ethics. Rhodes R Am J Bioeth; 2005; 5(1):7-28. PubMed ID: 16036651 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Justice and research design: the case for a semi-randomization clinical trial. Veatch RM Clin Res; 1983 Feb; 31(1):12-22. PubMed ID: 10299203 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. [Ethics committees in USA--background and development. Responsible conductors of clinical trials required for risk minimization]. Lund LH Lakartidningen; 2008 Jan 9-15; 105(1-2):42-4. PubMed ID: 18293746 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. Ethical principles in health research and review process. Tangwa GB Acta Trop; 2009 Nov; 112 Suppl 1():S2-7. PubMed ID: 19665441 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Risk assessment as a paradox: when actions of an IRB become incompatible with ethical principles. Ranjbar V Account Res; 2012; 19(5):273-84. PubMed ID: 23009268 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Is mandatory research ethics reviewing ethical? Dyck M; Allen G J Med Ethics; 2013 Aug; 39(8):517-20. PubMed ID: 22865925 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. [The principles and practice of research ethics]. Hirase C Rinsho Ketsueki; 2018; 59(10):2380-2389. PubMed ID: 30305549 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Ethical issues, safety, and data integrity in clinical trials. Tremaine WJ; Carlson MR; Isaacs KL; Motil KJ; Robuck PR; Wurzelmann JI Inflamm Bowel Dis; 2005 Nov; 11 Suppl 1():S17-21. PubMed ID: 16254478 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Institutional review boards in the university setting: review of pharmaceutical testing protocols, informed consent and ethical concerns. Kobasic DM J Coll Univ Law; 1988; 15(2):185-216. PubMed ID: 11659168 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. Justice for injured research subjects. Elliott C N Engl J Med; 2012 Jul; 367(1):6-8. PubMed ID: 22762312 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. Eschewing definitions of the therapeutic misconception: a family resemblance analysis. Goldberg DS J Med Philos; 2011 Jun; 36(3):296-320. PubMed ID: 21606116 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Getting the justification for research ethics review right. Dunn M J Med Ethics; 2013 Aug; 39(8):527-8. PubMed ID: 23118467 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Disclosing clinical trial results: publicity, significance and independence. Liao SM; Sheehan M; Clarke S Am J Bioeth; 2009 Aug; 9(8):W3-5. PubMed ID: 19998144 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. Ethical issues in psychiatric research on children and adolescents. Hoop JG; Smyth AC; Roberts LW Child Adolesc Psychiatr Clin N Am; 2008 Jan; 17(1):127-48, x. PubMed ID: 18036483 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. An ethical analysis of exception from informed consent regulations. Morris MC Acad Emerg Med; 2005 Nov; 12(11):1113-9. PubMed ID: 16264082 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. The ethics of dental research: an overview of basic principles. Branson R J Dent Res; 1980 Jul; 59(C):1214-20. PubMed ID: 11658260 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. Stepped-wedge trials should be classified as research for the purpose of ethical review. Hemming K; Taljaard M; Marshall T; Goldstein CE; Weijer C Clin Trials; 2019 Dec; 16(6):580-588. PubMed ID: 31818147 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Universal and uniform protections of human subjects in research. Shamoo AE; Schwartz J Am J Bioeth; 2008 Nov; 8(11):3-5. PubMed ID: 19061094 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. Ethical considerations of researchers conducting pediatric clinical drug trials: a qualitative survey in two Belgian university children's hospitals. Van Hoof W; Meesters K; Dossche L; Christiaens D; De Bruyne P; Vande Walle J Eur J Pediatr; 2018 Jul; 177(7):1003-1008. PubMed ID: 29679141 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]