These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
190 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31859284)
1. Prevalence and Morphology of Mandibular Incisive Canal: Comparison among Healthy, Periodontitis and Edentulous Mandibles in a Population of the Beijing Area Using Cone-beam Computed Tomography. Zhang YQ; Yan XB; Zhang LQ; Xie XY; Liu DG; Zhang ZY Chin J Dent Res; 2019; 22(4):241-249. PubMed ID: 31859284 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. An analysis of anterior mandibular anatomy by using cone beam computed tomography: A study of 225 mandibular images. Wright RA; Bidra AS; Kuo CL J Prosthet Dent; 2020 Apr; 123(4):595-601. PubMed ID: 31590979 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Anatomical landmarks of mandibular interforaminal region related to dental implant placement with 3D CBCT: comparison between edentulous and dental mandibles. Sener E; Onem E; Akar GC; Govsa F; Ozer MA; Pinar Y; Mert A; Baksi Sen BG Surg Radiol Anat; 2018 Jun; 40(6):615-623. PubMed ID: 29124343 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [Mandibular incisive canal by cone beam CT]. Huang H; Liu P; Li X; Pei Z; Yang X; Bai S; Huang Y Hua Xi Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2013 Oct; 31(5):479-82. PubMed ID: 24298798 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Detection Rate and Variability in Measurement of Mandibular Incisive Canal on Cone-Beam Computed Tomography: A Study of 220 Dentate Hemi-Mandibles from Italy. Borghesi A; Di Salvo D; Ciolli P; Falcone T; Ravanelli M; Farina D; Carapella N J Imaging; 2022 Jun; 8(6):. PubMed ID: 35735960 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Assessment of the visibility and characteristics of the mandibular incisive canal: cone beam computed tomography versus panoramic radiography. Sahman H; Sekerci AE; Sisman Y; Payveren M Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2014; 29(1):71-8. PubMed ID: 24451856 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Mandibular incisive canal-related prevalence, morphometric parameters, and implant placement implications: a multicenter study of 847 CBCT scans. Barbosa DA; Kurita LM; Pimenta AV; Teixeira RC; Silva PG; Ribeiro TR; Melo DP; Costa FW Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal; 2020 May; 25(3):e337-e345. PubMed ID: 32134897 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Morphology study of mandibular incisive canal in adults based on cone-beam computed tomography]. Kong N; Yuan H; Miao F; Xie L; Zhu L; Chen N Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2015 Feb; 50(2):69-73. PubMed ID: 25908188 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Mandibular incisive canal in Han Chinese using cone beam computed tomography. Kong N; Hui M; Miao F; Yuan H; Du Y; Chen N Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2016 Sep; 45(9):1142-6. PubMed ID: 27184354 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Cone-beam CT assessment of implant-related anatomy landmarks of the anterior mandible in a Chinese population. Xie L; Li T; Chen J; Yin D; Wang W; Xie Z Surg Radiol Anat; 2019 Aug; 41(8):927-934. PubMed ID: 31069446 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The mandibular incisive canal and its anatomical relationships: A cone beam computed tomography study. Pereira-Maciel P; Tavares-de-Sousa E; Oliveira-Sales MA Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal; 2015 Nov; 20(6):e723-8. PubMed ID: 26449433 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Assessment of prevalence and position of mandibular incisive canal: A cone beam computed tomography study. Ayesha RT; Pachipulusu B; Govindaraju P Tzu Chi Med J; 2020; 32(2):205-210. PubMed ID: 32269956 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Study of the mandibular incisive canal anatomy using cone beam computed tomography. Kabak SL; Zhuravleva NV; Melnichenko YM; Savrasova NA Surg Radiol Anat; 2017 Jun; 39(6):647-655. PubMed ID: 27837264 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Assessment of Location and Anatomical Characteristics of Mental Foramen, Anterior Loop and Mandibular Incisive Canal Using Cone Beam Computed Tomography. Panjnoush M; Rabiee ZS; Kheirandish Y J Dent (Tehran); 2016 Mar; 13(2):126-132. PubMed ID: 27928241 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Characteristics of intrabony nerve canals in mandibular interforaminal region by using cone-beam computed tomography and a recommendation of safe zone for implant and bone harvesting. Yang XW; Zhang FF; Li YH; Wei B; Gong Y Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2017 Jun; 19(3):530-538. PubMed ID: 28374431 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Retrospective study of the anterior loop of the inferior alveolar nerve and the incisive canal using cone beam computed tomography. Rosa MB; Sotto-Maior BS; Machado Vde C; Francischone CE Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2013; 28(2):388-92. PubMed ID: 23527339 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Mandibular canal assessment in dentate and edentulous ridges of 400 Iraqi Arab and Kurdish populations using cone beam computed tomography. Basheer Taha O; Arif Awang Nawi M; Yap Abdullah J; Al-Rawas M; Yusof A Saudi Dent J; 2024 May; 36(5):815-820. PubMed ID: 38766286 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Imaging Aspects of the Mandibular Incisive Canal: A PROSPERO-Registered Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Cone Beam Computed Tomography Studies. Ferreira Barbosa DA; Barros ID; Teixeira RC; Menezes Pimenta AV; Kurita LM; Barros Silva PG; Gurgel Costa FW Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2019; 34(2):423–433. PubMed ID: 30282085 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Evaluation of Mandibular Incisive Canal using Cone Beam Computed Tomography in Malaysians. Lim JTS; Kang WJ; Ajit Bapat R; Kanneppady SK; Pandurangappa R J Maxillofac Oral Surg; 2019 Dec; 18(4):596-603. PubMed ID: 31624443 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]