133 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31859533)
1. Evaluating the German Biobank Node as Coordinating Institution of the German Biobank Alliance: Engaging with Stakeholders via Survey Research.
Klingler C; von Jagwitz-Biegnitz M; Hartung ML; Hummel M; Specht C
Biopreserv Biobank; 2020 Apr; 18(2):64-72. PubMed ID: 31859533
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Position Statement from the German Biobank Alliance on the Cooperation Between Academic Biobanks and Industry Partners.
Baber R; Hummel M; Jahns R; von Jagwitz-Biegnitz M; Kirsten R; Klingler C; Nussbeck SY; Specht C
Biopreserv Biobank; 2019 Aug; 17(4):372-374. PubMed ID: 31314575
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [Requirements for a cross-location biobank IT infrastructure : Survey of stakeholder input on the establishment of a biobank network of the German Biobank Alliance (GBA)].
Schüttler C; Buschhüter N; Döllinger C; Ebert L; Hummel M; Linde J; Prokosch HU; Proynova R; Lablans M
Pathologe; 2018 Jul; 39(4):289-296. PubMed ID: 29691676
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A Federated Online Search Tool for Biospecimens (Sample Locator): Usability Study.
Schüttler C; Huth V; von Jagwitz-Biegnitz M; Lablans M; Prokosch HU; Griebel L
J Med Internet Res; 2020 Aug; 22(8):e17739. PubMed ID: 32663150
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. On-The-Fly Query Translation Between i2b2 and Samply in the German Biobank Node (GBN) Prototypes.
Mate S; Vormstein P; Kadioglu D; Majeed RW; Lablans M; Prokosch HU; Storf H
Stud Health Technol Inform; 2017; 243():42-46. PubMed ID: 28883167
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. GBA/GBN-position on the feedback of incidental findings in biobank-based research: consensus-based workflow for hospital-based biobanks.
Geiger J; Fuchs J; Starke M; Neumann M; Baber R; Nussbeck SY; Kiehntopf M; Specht C; Illig T; Hummel M; Jahns R
Eur J Hum Genet; 2023 Sep; 31(9):1066-1072. PubMed ID: 36732662
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Proof-of-Concept Integration of Heterogeneous Biobank IT Infrastructures into a Hybrid Biobanking Network.
Mate S; Kadioglu D; Majeed RW; Stöhr MR; Folz M; Vormstein P; Storf H; Brucker DP; Keune D; Zerbe N; Hummel M; Senghas K; Prokosch HU; Lablans M
Stud Health Technol Inform; 2017; 243():100-104. PubMed ID: 28883179
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Stakeholder engagement to ensure the sustainability of biobanks: a survey of potential users of biobank services.
Klingler C; von Jagwitz-Biegnitz M; Baber R; Becker KF; Dahl E; Eibner C; Fuchs J; Groenewold MK; Hartung ML; Hummel M; Jahns R; Kirsten R; Kopfnagel V; Maushagen R; Nussbeck SY; Schoneberg A; Winter T; Specht C
Eur J Hum Genet; 2022 Dec; 30(12):1344-1354. PubMed ID: 34031552
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The Biobank Economic Modeling Tool (BEMT): Online Financial Planning to Facilitate Biobank Sustainability.
Odeh H; Miranda L; Rao A; Vaught J; Greenman H; McLean J; Reed D; Memon S; Fombonne B; Guan P; Moore HM
Biopreserv Biobank; 2015 Dec; 13(6):421-9. PubMed ID: 26697911
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Erratum to: Requirements for a cross-location biobank IT infrastructure : Survey of stakeholder input on the establishment of a biobank network of the German Biobank Alliance (GBA)].
Schüttler C; Buschhüter N; Döllinger C; Ebert L; Hummel M; Linde J; Prokosch HU; Proynova R; Lablans M
Pathologe; 2018 Sep; 39(5):423. PubMed ID: 30105610
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Public's attitudes on participation in a biobank for research: an Italian survey.
Porteri C; Pasqualetti P; Togni E; Parker M
BMC Med Ethics; 2014 Nov; 15():81. PubMed ID: 25425352
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. What Do Biomedical Researchers Want from Biobanks? Results of an Online Survey.
Rush A; Catchpoole DR; Reaiche-Miller G; Gilbert T; Ng W; Watson PH; Byrne JA
Biopreserv Biobank; 2022 Jun; 20(3):271-282. PubMed ID: 34756100
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. The journey to establishing an IT-infrastructure within the German Biobank Alliance.
Schüttler C; Prokosch HU; Hummel M; Lablans M; Kroll B; Engels C;
PLoS One; 2021; 16(9):e0257632. PubMed ID: 34551019
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Prioritizing Approaches to Engage Community Members and Build Trust in Biobanks: A Survey of Attitudes and Opinions of Adults within Outpatient Practices at the University of Maryland.
Overby CL; Maloney KA; Alestock TD; Chavez J; Berman D; Sharaf RM; Fitzgerald T; Kim EY; Palmer K; Shuldiner AR; Mitchell BD
J Pers Med; 2015 Jul; 5(3):264-79. PubMed ID: 26226006
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The Public's Awareness of and Attitude Toward Research Biobanks - A Regional German Survey.
Bossert S; Kahrass H; Strech D
Front Genet; 2018; 9():190. PubMed ID: 29881399
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Stakeholder analysis: a useful tool for biobank planning.
Bjugn R; Casati B
Biopreserv Biobank; 2012 Jun; 10(3):239-44. PubMed ID: 24835062
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. National survey and community advisory board development for a bipolar disorder biobank.
Frye MA; Doederlein A; Koenig B; McElroy SL; Nassan M; Seymour LR; Biernacka JM; Daniels AS
Bipolar Disord; 2015 Sep; 17(6):598-605. PubMed ID: 26291791
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Biobank classification in an Australian setting.
Rush A; Christiansen JH; Farrell JP; Goode SM; Scott RJ; Spring KJ; Byrne JA
Biopreserv Biobank; 2015 Jun; 13(3):212-8. PubMed ID: 26035012
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Participant Satisfaction With a Preference-Setting Tool for the Return of Individual Research Results in Pediatric Genomic Research.
Holm IA; Iles BR; Ziniel SI; Bacon PL; Savage SK; Christensen KD; Weitzman ER; Green RC; Huntington NL
J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics; 2015 Oct; 10(4):414-26. PubMed ID: 26376753
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Practice variation across consent templates for biobank research. a survey of German biobanks.
Hirschberg I; Knüppel H; Strech D
Front Genet; 2013; 4():240. PubMed ID: 24294219
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
