These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

110 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3186009)

  • 1. Who disciplines the disciplinary committee?
    Chan MJ
    N Z Med J; 1988 Oct; 101(856 Pt 1):669. PubMed ID: 3186009
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Medical Practitioners Disciplinary Committee: analysis of complaints for 1982.
    Richwhite DL
    N Z Med J; 1983 Nov; 96(743 Pt 2):931-4. PubMed ID: 6579414
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Medical Practitioners Disciplinary Committee review of complaints.
    Richwhite DL
    N Z Med J; 1983 Jan; 96(724):58-60. PubMed ID: 6571958
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [A lack of understanding of the rulings by disciplinary committees].
    Hubben JH
    Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 1998 Aug; 142(33):1851-3. PubMed ID: 9856163
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Indiana hospitals attack state PROs as insensitive, arbitrary in judgments.
    Richman D
    Mod Healthc; 1985 Oct; 15(21):74. PubMed ID: 10274280
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Out of the shadows: Professional Standards Committee hearings.
    Gorman RF
    Med J Aust; 2002 Apr; 176(8):399; author reply 400. PubMed ID: 12041639
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Open letter to the S.C. PRO.
    Schweiger DA; Bradham RR
    J S C Med Assoc; 1988 Mar; 84(3):137-8. PubMed ID: 3361852
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Review committee on medical education.
    Haddon OB
    N Z Med J; 1990 Jan; 103(882):22. PubMed ID: 2304677
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. MetaStar set to undertake new quality initiatives.
    Gold JA; Spurlin D
    WMJ; 1999 Dec; 98(8):57-8. PubMed ID: 10639899
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. New PRO guidelines seen as good, but..
    Gallivan M
    Hospitals; 1986 Feb; 60(4):30, 33. PubMed ID: 3943833
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Say PSRO coordinators fail to question doctors.
    Boyles W
    Health Care Week; 1979 Feb; 2(31):1, 8. PubMed ID: 10324378
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. New Medicare review system an option for private sector.
    Garrigan LA
    Bus Insur; 1986 Feb; 20(7):45-6. PubMed ID: 10324862
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Professional Standards Review Organizations: conditions for grants.
    Fed Regist; 1978 Apr; 43(64):13969-73. PubMed ID: 10307343
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Problematic or practical? Professional body occupational health guidelines.
    Rodham K
    Occup Med (Lond); 1999 Jul; 49(5):307-11. PubMed ID: 10628056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. New Zealand doctors' attitudes towards the complaints and disciplinary process.
    Cunningham W
    N Z Med J; 2004 Jul; 117(1198):U973. PubMed ID: 15326496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Criteria and the PSRO program.
    Zelinger G; Stephens S
    QRB Qual Rev Bull; 1980 Aug; 6(8):16-9. PubMed ID: 6776468
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. In response to MetaStar's comment.
    Murdock DK
    WMJ; 1999 Dec; 98(8):4. PubMed ID: 10639885
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Can PSRO's really insure quality?
    Darr K
    Health Care Week; 1979 Jan; 2(26):11. PubMed ID: 10273116
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Out of the shadows: Professional Standards Committee hearings.
    Dawson E
    Med J Aust; 2002 Apr; 176(8):399-400; author reply 400. PubMed ID: 12041638
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Guidelines for hospitals contracting with peer review organizations.
    J Am Med Rec Assoc; 1984 Jun; 55(6):58-9. PubMed ID: 10310659
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.